Cases

407 Pa. Superior Ct. 448 (1991) 595 A.2d 1232 Ronald J. AMODEO and Kimberly Amodeo v. RYAN HOMES, INC., a Corporation Pleasant Valley Land Co., Appeal of RYAN HOMES, INC., a Corporation. Ronald J. AMODEO and Kimberly Amodeo v. RYAN HOMES, INC., a Corporation v. PLEASANT VALLEY LAND CO., Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 16, 1991.

RYAN, Circuit Judge. Kimberly Hobbs Lowery appeals from her convictions and sentence entered after a jury found her guilty of (1) conspiring to commit a bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2113(a), (d); (2) aiding and abetting Edison Wayne Lowery, her husband, in bank robbery and in jeopardizing the life of a person by using a dangerous weapon, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 2113(a), (d); and (3

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States ' District Judge INTRODUCTION During the evening of February 23, 2012, Jerome Deon Ladette Harrell turned 'himself in to the Stearns County Jail (the “Jail”) on two outstanding Hennepin County traffic warrants. After exhibiting odd and erratic behavior throughout the night, he was pronounced dead the following morning. The trust

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN KARNOSKI; CATHRINE No. 18-35347 SCHMID, Staff Sergeant; D. L., FKA K. G., by his next friend D.C. No. and mother, LAURA GARZA; 2:17-cv-01297-MJP HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FUND; GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE; LINDSEY MULLER, Chief Warrant Officer; TERECE LEWIS, Petty Officer First Class; PHILLIP STEPHENS, Petty Officer Second Class; MEGAN WINTERS, Petty Officer Seco

444 F.Supp.2d 718 (2006) Jerry RYAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 3:03-CV-1769-B. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. June 9, 2006. *719 *720 Robert J. Hill, Claxton & Hill, Joe Kendall, Willie Briscoe, Provost Umphrey Law Fir

STEWART, J. I,The defendant, Joseph Daniel Riley (“Riley”), pursuant to the authority granted to him under a power of attorney, donated his mother’s property to himself days before her death. His half-siblings (Kimberly Pee Tatum, Roy Pee, Timothy Pee, and Raymond Pee), the plaintiffs, filed suit to annul the donation on the grounds that it divested their mother of all her property and was not authorized by the power of atto

DAVIS, Justice, concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part: (Filed Nov. 18, 2013) It has been said that “ ‘[t]he law does not require parents to be perfeet[.]’” In re: Q.A.H. v. M.H., — S.W.3d -,-, No. WD 75786, 2013 WL 3661746, at *14 (Mo.Ct.App. July 16, 2013) (quoting In re: S.M.H. v. T.H., 160 S.W.3d 355, 372 (Mo.2005)). Accord Bree

Freudenberg, J. *383 NATURE OF CASE The daughter of a testator sought a declaration of her rights under her father's will as an alleged devisee, claiming to be entitled to one-half of the residual share of her father's

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DONALD MORRIS and MARY MORRIS, Appellants, v. TOWER HILL PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D2023-2228 [June 13, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward Coun

659 F.3d 53 (2011) CQ INTERNATIONAL CO., INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. ROCHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC., USA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 10-1838. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted May 2, 2011. Decided October 3, 2011. *55 Robert J. Wierenga, Kimberly K. Kefalas, Suzanne L. Wahl, Miller, Canfield,

*1226 Opinion McKINSTER J.— I. INTRODUCTION Kimberly L. (mother) appeals from orders under Welfare and Institutions Code 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. Plaintiffs Saul M. Kaufman, Kimberly Stegich, Gordon Jarratt, and Amanda Rudd (the “Kaufman ” plaintiffs) and defendant American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc (“American Express”) (together, the “Settling Parties”) have moved for final approval of their Class Action Settlement (“the Settlement”). For the

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0220p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CHRISTIAN HEALTHCARE CENTERS, INC. (23-1769); │ SACRED HEART OF JES

757 F.Supp.2d 238 (2010) Blom ASA, Plaintiff, v. PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant. No. 10-CV-6607L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. December 2, 2010. *239 Edward Ryan Conan, Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse, NY, Joseph S. Nacca, Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC, Rochester, NY, Sean C. Sheely, Holland &

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. Plaintiffs (the “Kaufman” plaintiffs) brought this class action against defendant American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“American Express”), challenging certain fees assessed on American Express-issued gift cards. This matter is presently before the court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Preliminary A

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JEFFREY S. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, The General Automobile Insurance Services, Inc., d/b/a The General, Permanent General Assurance Corporation, and Permanent General Assurance Corporation of Ohio (collectively, “Defendants”). Having considered the parties’ papers

PER CURIAM: Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lansdowne, No. 1:00-cr-00185-TSE-l (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2013 & entered Aug. 1, 2013

944 P.2d 68 (1997) 189 Ariz. 553 JENNIFER B., Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, Angela S., and Jonathan S., Appellees. No. 1 CA-JV 96-0222. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D. June 24, 1997. Review Denied September 25, 1997. *69 Helm & Kyle, Ltd.

62 P.3d 574 (2003) 2003 WY 14 Joseph MAY, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 01-40. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 30, 2003. *576 Kenneth M. Koski, State Public Defender; Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel, and Ryan R. Roden, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel, R

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 324 OPINION This appeal involves the statutory construction of the term "physician" as used in Chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, specifically § 74.351(r)(5)(C), as it pertains to the qualifications of an "expert" for purposes of an expert report on the i