Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 38419 JOSEPH A. GERDON, ) ) Boise, June 2012 Term Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) 2012 Opinion No. 108 v. ) ) Filed: July 2, 20

178 Cal.App.4th 1020 (2009) BERG & BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN BOYLE et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H031591. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. October 29, 2009. *1024 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Robert R. Moore, Michael J. Betz and Kevin Ryan for Plaintiff

ORDER The Opinion filed July 13, 2012, slip op. 8109, and appearing at 687 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir.2012), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. With the Opinion withdrawn, the Plaintiffs-Appellees’ petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are moot. The parties may file a petition fo

113 P.3d 604 (2005) David BERG and Marge Berg, Appellants, v. David and Tsukiko POPHAM, d/b/a Alladin Cleaners, and Norge Corporation, and its successors in interest Magic Chef Corporation, Maytag Corporation, ABC Inc., ABC Co., and ABC Corp., Appellees. No. S-10815. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 20, 2005. *605 Michael W. Flanigan

ORDER GRABER, Circuit Judge, Presiding. Pursuant to Rule 407(a) of the Alaska Rules of. Appellate Procedure, we respectfully request that the Alaska Supreme Court answer the following novel questions of Alaska law: 1. Alaska Statute section 46.03.822(a)(4), in contrast to 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(3), contains the word “or” preceding the phrase “by any other party o

STEWART, J. | Defendant-Appellant John “Jack” C. Van Berg is appealing a default judgment granted in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Franks Farms, L.L.C. Finding no merit in his claims, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. FACTS On December 15, 2006, Franks Farms filed a petition for recovery on a promissory note against Van Berg. In the petition, Franks Farms

979 F.Supp. 330 (1997) Ian BERG, Plaintiff, v. Thomas C. EGAN, III, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 94-7805. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 25, 1997. *331 Philip J. Berg, Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Lafayette Hill, PA, for Plaintiff. Arthur R. Shuman, Wyndmoor, PA, for Defendant Thomas C. Ega

JUSTICE RATHJE delivered the opinion of the court: The issue presented is whether the appellate court possessed jurisdiction over plaintiff’s appeal. We hold that it did not. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Joan Berg, filed a personal injury action against defendants, Allied Se

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether the creators of the yet-unproduced film The Minotaur are collaterally estopped from pursuing a copyright infringement claim against the producers of Terminator II. I In 1987, Filia and Constantinos Kourtis developed the concept for a film ent

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J. Wendy Joy Hilgenberg (“Wife”) appeals the trial court’s “Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage,” dated January 12, 2015, dissolving her marriage to Joseph Harold Hilgenberg (“Husband”). In two points on appeal, Wife alleges trial court error in awarding physical custody of the minor children to Husband, and the division of marital property. Finding no p

359 S.W.3d 131 (2011) Kristin BERG, Respondent, v. Andrew BERG, Appellant. No. WD 72917. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. December 27, 2011. Jonathan Sternberg, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. David R. Mitchell, for respondent. Before Division Four: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Chief Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and CYNTHIA SUTER, Special Judge.</

Berg v Cahill (2023 NY Slip Op 00645) Berg v Cahill 2023 NY Slip Op 00645 Decided on February 8, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

586 N.E.2d 649 (1991) 224 Ill. App.3d 859 166 Ill.Dec. 691 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony BERG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-90-0065. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. December 30, 1991. Rehearing Denied March 2, 1992. G. Joseph Weller, Deputy Defender, Th

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge On August 10, 2016, the district court issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part a motion for summary judgment by defendants. The plaintiffs now move for reconsideration of that opinion to the extent it dismissed their purported claim under Monell v. Department of Social Services,

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge DIAZ joined. GREGORY, Circuit Judge: On August 15, 2013, a jury awarded Donna Cisson $250,000 in compensatory damages on a design defect and failure to warn claim against C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”), and awarded an additional $1,750,000 in punitive damages. The puniti

16‐3146 Berg et al. v. N.Y.C. Police Comm’r et al. 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term, 2017 7 8 Argued: October 4, 2017 9 Decided: July 25, 2018 10

CANE, J. ¶ 1. Ronald Berg appeals a judgment concerning a recorded general easement over property owned by Thomas Ziel and Shawn Newhouse (collectively, Ziel). The judgment extinguished Berg's existing access route, but granted Berg access on a newly *132created road along the edge of Ziel's property. Berg argues prior landowners had selected the location of the general e

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2024 Term _______________ March 26, 2024 released at 3:00 p.m.

519 N.E.2d 755 (1988) Teresa L. LATHER, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert J. Lather, II, Deceased, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Joseph A. BERG, and Ronald J. Bailey, Appellees (Defendants). No. 2-285-A-56. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District. March 3, 1988. *756 Lloyd H. Milliken, Jr., Mark J. Roberts, Burton M. Harris

DONALDSON, Judge. Melissa Berg appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Than Nguyen and Myanh Nguyen. The Nguyens leased property to a tenant. Berg was injured by a dog owned by the tenant, but Berg was not on the leased property at the time of the injury. Berg sued the Nguyeps, as landlords of the tenant. We affirm the summary judgment in favor of the Ngu-yens. Facts and Procedural Histo't'y</