Cases

454 F.3d 1154 Marian P. OPALA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joseph M. WATT; James R. Winchester; Robert E. Lavender; Rudolph Hargrave; Yvonne Kauger; James E. Edmondson, Steven W. Taylor; and Tom Colbert, in their individual and administrative capacities, Defendants-Appellants. No. 05-6261. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 21, 2006.

393 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2005) Marian P. OPALA, Plaintiff, v. Joseph M. WATT; James R. Winchester; Robert E. Lavender; Rudolph Hargrave; Yvonne Kauger; James E. Edmondson; Steven W. Taylor; and, Tom Colbert, in their individual and administrative capacities, Defendants. No. CIV-04-1771-R. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. May 20, 2005.

174 P.3d 556 (2006) 2006 OK 10 In re AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE XVIII OF THE RULES CREATING AND CONTROLLING THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION. SCBD No. 4951. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 6, 2006. As Corrected February 8, 2006. ORDER AMENDING ARTICLE XVIII OF THE RULES CREATING AND CONTROLLING THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION REGARDING AC

174 P.3d 550 (2005) 2005 OK 57 In the Matter of SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION for NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2004. No. SCBD-5076. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 27, 2005. ORDER OF SUSPENSION JOSEPH M. WATT, Chief Justice. ¶ 01 This matter c

174 P.3d 553 (2005) 2005 OK 56 In the MATTER of the SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF the OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION FOR NONPAYMENT OF 2005 DUES. No. SCBD-5075. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 27, 2005. As Amended September 12, 2005. ORDER OF SUSPENSION JOSEPH M. WATT, Chief Justice. ¶ 01 This matter comes on befo

(2006) MARIAN P. OPALA v. JOSEPH M. WATT, ET AL. No. 06-548 Supreme Court of United States. December 4, 2006. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-239-CV CINDY SEALE, AS NEXT FRIEND OF APPELLANTS KATHERINE M. WATTS, AND K

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-239-CV CINDY SEALE, AS NEXT FRIEND OF APPELLANTS KATHERINE M. WATTS, AND KATHERINE M. WATTS </

MEMORANDUM EXPLAINING REASONS FOR SENTENCE WOLLE, District Judge. Defendant pleaded guilty to a one-count charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 United States Code sections 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(1)(B). At *140the sentencing hearing held on September 14, 1989, the court received evidence and decided a single disputed i

SUMMARY ORDER AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. M & M Packaging, Inc. (“M & M”) appeals a February 28, 2007 judgment dismissing its complaint in the Southern District of New York. Also before us is M & M’s nunc pro tunc motion for enlargement of time to file a reply brief, appe

MEMORANDUM OPINION TRISH M. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the court on August 28, 2014, for evidentiary hearings on Debtor’s amended Chapter 13 Plan dated June 26, 2014, and a Motion for Relief from Stay (hereinafter “Motion for Relief’) filed by the Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee on behalf of the Holders of the Alternative Loan Trust 20-6-OA21, Mortgage P

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant M & M Packaging, Inc. (“M & M”) brought 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Defendants-Appellees, who are past and present members of the Idaho Potato Commission (“IPC”) and the IPC’s former president, Patrick J. Kole. The IPC, a state agency, administers a licensing scheme to ensure that all

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS ALDON J. ANDERSON, Chief Judge. The following facts are taken from the Report and recommendation of the magistrate. The plaintiff seeks a review of the final decision of the Secretary of the Interior denying his application for an oil and gas lease. The final decision was entered on April 15, 1981. The plaintiff’s complaint was filed on September 30, 1981. The

YOU RECENTLY MADE INQUIRY TO THIS OFFICE AS TO WHETHER THE GOVERNOR HAS AUTHORITY BY EXECUTIVE ORDER TO BRING UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES WHO WERE APPOINTED BY GOVERNOR'S LETTER UNDER THE MERIT SYSTEM? FACTS ON JANUARY 3, 1991, GOVERNOR BELLMON SIGNED EXECUTIVE ORDER 91-1. THE ORDER PURPORTS TO PLACE ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE HIGH AY SAFETY DIVISION OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDER THE MERIT SYSTEM, PURSUANT TO 74 O.S. 840.1 (1990). THE GOVERNOR S AUTHORITY TO PLACE AGEN

580 F.Supp. 27 (1984) SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James G. WATT, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-347 MMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 1, 1984. Andrew B. Kirkpatrick, Jr., and Martin P. Tully, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiffs; William T. Coleman,

591 F.Supp. 929 (1984) SANTA FE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James G. WATT, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-347 MMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 2, 1984. As Amended July 17, 1984. *930 Andrew B. Kirkpatrick, Jr., and Martin P. Tully, Morris, N

OPINION BY Judge ROBERT SIMPSON. William Watt (Claimant) asks whether the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) erred in affirming a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision, which denied and dismissed his claim petition for lack of jurisdiction. Claimant contends the WCJ erred in finding his employment was not principally localized in Pennsylvani

J-S15015-23 2023 PA Super 120 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MANUEL ALEJANDRO RONDON : : : No

J-S15015-23 2023 PA Super 120 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MANUEL ALEJANDRO RONDON : : : No

Affirmed and Opinion filed October 24, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00851-CV STEWART A. FELDMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, THE FELDMAN LAW FIRM LLP, RAPID SETTLEMENTS, LTD., RAPID MANAGEMENT CORP., RSL-3B-IL, LTD., RSL-3B-IL MANAGEMENT CORP., RSL-5B-IL MANAGEMENT CORP., RSL-5B-IL, LTD., RSL SPECIAL MANAGEMENT CORP., AND RSL-SPECIAL IV, LTD., Appellants