⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Joseph J. Lopez and Jamie L Lopez”

Lopez Sr. v. Florespublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-03-15 · Published · cited 0× · 223 So. 3d 1033; 2017 WL 1018492; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3472; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 630
PER CURIAM. Petitioners, the children of the now deceased Jose Ignacio Lopez, Sr. (the “Children”), seek certiorari review of a trial court order denying the Children’s motion to disqualify the law firm of Kluger, Kap-lan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L. (the “Kluger Firm”) from representing respondent Maria Mercedes Flores. Because the unrebutted record
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00034-CV 5655743 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00034-CV 5930003 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00034-CV 5480026 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00034-CV 6173724 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, T
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00034-CV 5930003 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS July 7, 2015
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 602 F. Supp. 2d 604; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18870; 2009 WL 673689
602 F.Supp.2d 604 (2009) Raymond LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. ALROD ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-2977. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 11, 2009. *605 Gerald J. Williams, Williams Cuker & Berezofsky, Jamie C. Ray, Law Offices of Stephen S. Pennington, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00034-CV 5080535 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE JOSEPH SIMMONS III, ET AL. ) No. ED112785 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. )
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2012-11-06 · Published · cited 3× · 61 Va. App. 79; 733 S.E.2d 667; 2012 WL 5390000; 2012 Va. App. LEXIS 345
McCullough, judge. Jamie Aaron Kuhne challenges his voluntary manslaughter conviction, arguing that certain statements he made to law enforcement should have been excluded as the fruit of an illegal interrogation under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Missouri v
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-07-10 · Published · cited 9× · 895 F.3d 69
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 14, 2017 Decided July 10, 2018 No. 16-1058 VERITAS HEALTH SERVICES, INC., D/B/A CHINO VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT UNITED NURSES ASSOCIATIONS OF CALIFORNIA/UNION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, NUHHCE, A
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
EMILY EVERETT * NO. 2022-CA-0539 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL AIR PRODUCTS AND * CHEMICALS, INC., ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH:
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-29 · Published · cited 3× · 285 F. Supp. 3d 381
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Chundra Adams, acting on behalf of her child T.J., brought this action alleging that the District of Columbia is violating the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. , by failing to provide her son a free and ap
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007-08-06 · Published · cited 25× · 495 F.3d 232; 62 A.L.R. 6th 691; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18618; 2007 WL 2230724
495 F.3d 232 (2007) Daryl CHAUVIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Defendant. Caritha Williams, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Defendant-Appellee.*233 Doris L. Huntley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allstate Indemnity Company,
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008-12-23 · Published · cited 6× · 398 B.R. 816; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 3416; 2008 WL 5396491
398 B.R. 816 (2008) In re NUTRITIONAL SOURCING CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 07-11038 (PJW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 23, 2008. *818 Michael B. Solow, Harold D. Israel, Matthew J. Micheli, Kaye Scholer LLC, Chicago, IL, David B. Stratton, David Fournier, James C. Carignan, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Wilmington,
District Court, S.D. New York · 1999-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 33 F. Supp. 2d 303; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1250; 1999 WL 20858
33 F.Supp.2d 303 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. Rosario GANGI, et al., Defendants. No. 97 CR. 1215(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 14, 1999. As Amended January 27, 1999. Order Denying Reconsideration, January 30, 1999. *304 Mary Jo White, U.S. Attorney for the Southe
Holsey v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010-09-14 · Published · cited 4× · 701 S.E.2d 538; 306 Ga. App. 75; 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3094; 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 864
701 S.E.2d 538 (2010) HOLSEY v. The STATE. No. A10A1978. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 14, 2010. *539 Charles M. Evans, for appellant. Jamie K. Inagawa, Solicitor-General, Joseph B. Myers, Jr., Assistant Solicitor-General, for appellee. BLACKBURN, Senior Appellate Judge. Following a stipulated bench
State v. Dornpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018-04-25 · Published · cited 34× · 182 A.3d 938; 233 N.J. 81
JUSTICE SOLOMON delivered the opinion of the Court. **85We are called upon to determine whether defendant Todd Dorn's right to a grand jury presentment under the New Jersey Constitution was violated when the trial court permitted the State, on the eve of trial, to increase the charge in count two of defendant's indictment from a third-degree to a