Cases

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-26-2004 Johnson v. Guhl Precedential or Non-Precedenti

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

MEMORANDUM OPINION GÓMEZ, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Jad Shalhout and Saker Shalhout’s motion for a new trial. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 7, 2010 the Grand Jury returned an indictment against Jad Shalhout, Saker Shalhout, and Mohannad Abdel-Samad. Thereafter, on January 13, 2011, the Grand Jury handed down a superseding

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Medicaid is a federal assistance program, administered by the states, that helps individuals with below a certain level of assets pay for medical expenses. 1 Because Medicaid is available only to the needy, creative lawyers and financial planners have devis

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal from an adjudication of civil contempt presents the interesting and apparently novel question whether a non-party witness has standing on appeal to challenge a district court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit in which the witness has been compelled to furnish evidence. The issue arises on an appeal by the United States Catholic Conference (“USCC”) and the National Conferen

[Cite as Albers v. Lyon, 2026-Ohio-209.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JAMES ALBERS, : APPEAL NO. C-250017 TRIAL NO. A-1903421 FRIEDA AARON, : PATRICIA ADAMS, : JUDGMENT ENTRY MICHELLE AGEE,

O’Connor, J. {¶ 1} In case Nos. 2005-1210 and 2005-1211, we decide the constitutionality of a municipality’s taking of an individual’s property by eminent domain and transferring the property to a private entity for redevelopment. In doing so, we must balance two competing interests of great import in American democracy: the individual’s rights in the possession and security of property and the sovereign’s power to take priv

DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Appellants, former management employees of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) who accepted the terms of a severance incentive plan offered in 1990, filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 Ú.S.C. § 1001 et. seq., claiming that SWBT; its parent company, SBC Communications; and its Vice President of Human Resources, Robert A. Dickemper, brea

357 F.3d 403 Donald H. JOHNSON; Juanita L. Johnson; Eugene V. Mariani; Dorothy Mariani; Mary Lou Fleming; William R. Fleming; William C. Schaible; Phyllis R. Schaible, by her Court Appointed Guardian; Lois Benedetto; Gerald Benedetto; Donna R. Banks; Charles V. Banks, Estate of; Raymond O. Denman, Jr.; Frances C. Denman; Charles N. Hicks; Marie L. Hicks; Ann B. Silbernagel; Norman V. Silbernagel; Anna Prystasch; Stanley Prystasch; Mary Mackron; Ant

ORDER GRANTING SHAREHOLDER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A STAY MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court are the following motions (collectively, the “Motions”): (i) Shareholder Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for a Stay (the “Fund 1 Motion,” Adv. Pro. No. 10-04609, ECF Doc. #2387) and (ii) Shareholder De

16 F.3d 1220NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. William A. ORTMAN; Lavina M. Ortman; Estate of Marcella G.Ortman, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE OF MICHIGAN; County of Oakland; County of Lapeer;County

89 F.Supp.2d 506 (2000) Corinne WAHLSTROM, Plaintiff, v. METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD COMPANY and William Chapman, Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 3589(PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 6, 2000. *507 *508 *509 *

475 F.Supp.2d 862 (2007) Curtis W. McGHEE, Jr., Plaintiff, v. POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY, IOWA; The City of Council Bluffs, Iowa; Joseph Hrvol; David Richter; Matthew Wilber; Daniel Larsen; Lyle Brown; and David Dawson, Defendants. Terry Harrington, individually and in his capacity as the father of Nicole Antoinette Harrington, Plaintiff, v. County of Pottawattamie, Iowa; City of Council Bluffs, Iowa; David Richter, in his individual and of

WINTER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I concur in part in the result reached by my colleagues’ opinion. I respectfully dissent from their holdings as to Act 64’s limits on expenditures by candidates, including “related expenditures” by individual supporters and political parties, and as to the Act’s forced centralization of local political parties. In view of the length of this separate opinion, I begin with a table of co

55 F.3d 399 Pens. Plan Guide P 23910QG. Bruce WILSON; Marco L. Gilliam; William H. Jones;Robert E. McVey; Jerry Mooneyham; Edwin R. Acheson; J.Marlene Adams; Betty E. Aldridge; Barbara Alexander; JoAnn Altschul; Virginia S. Amyx; Brenda J. Andrews; SandraK. Anglin; Islo D. Ashmore; Jerry L. Atwood; James D.Bailey; Jimmie F. Bailey; Margaret A. Bailey; Patsy R.Bailey; Jerry F. Baker; John C. Baker; Kat

672 So.2d 158 (1996) STATE of Louisiana v. Christopher SEPULVADO. No. 93-KA-2692. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 8, 1996. Rehearing Denied May 10, 1996. *161 Joseph William Bailey, Logansport, R. Neal Walker, Clive Adrian Stafford Smith, Elizabeth B. Daniel, New Orleans, for Applicant. Richard P. Ieyoub

772 F.2d 1140 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 548, 54 USLW 2146,103 Lab.Cas. P 55,525,6 Employee Benefits Ca 2129 Rose M. HOLLAND; Jean H. Stallings; Walter Burlington,Jr.; John C. Brooks, Commissioner of Labor of theState of North Carolina, Plaintiffs,andBill N. Slack; Jimmy W. Aheron; Carol Aldridge; Pamila B.Apple; Carole Baggett; Thomas F. Bowden; Walter Brom;Nellie B. Burwell;

824 F.2d 156 55 USLW 2682, 7 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1369 In re UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE and NationalConference of Catholic Bishops, Appellants.ABORTION RIGHTS MOBILIZATION, INC., Lawrence Lader, MargaretO. Strahl, M.D., Helen W. Edey, M.D., Ruth P. Smith,National Womens Health Network, Inc., Long Island NationalOrganization for Women-Nassau, Inc., Rabbi Israel Margolies,Reverend Bea Blair, Rabbi