Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joseph Haworth”
United States v. Haworthpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Todd Lowell G. Haworth appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 276-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Haworth has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for
Haworth v. Shillingerpublic domain
852 F.Supp. 961 (1994) Steven K. HAWORTH, Petitioner, v. Duane SHILLINGER, Warden Wyoming State Penitentiary, and Joseph B. Meyer, Attorney General for the State of Wyoming, Respondents. No. 94-CV-0006-B. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. May 26, 1994. Gerald M. Gallivan, Director Defender Aid Program, University of WY, College of Law (Jeffrey M. Hindoien
Haworth v. Statepublic domain
GOLDEN, Justice. A jury found appellant Steven Haworth guilty of aggravated assault and battery1 *913for his use of a pocketknife during a fight with Rod Risk on May 23, 1990, outside a bar near Casper, Wyoming. Haworth had claimed he used the knife in self-defense. On appeal, Haworth raises one issue:
Stott v. Haworthpublic domain
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: This controversy arose after the election of James G. Martin as governor of the state of North Carolina. Governor Martin, a Republican, succeeded Governor James M. Hunt, a Democrat. After taking office, Governor Martin and his cabinet officers made numerous personnel changes which resulted, inter alia, in the termination or demotion of government employees that held “exempt” positions
Jenkins v. Haworth, Inc.public domain
572 F.Supp. 591 (1983) George H. JENKINS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. HAWORTH, INC.; Richard J. Haworth; and Edward J. Clark, and Haworth/Houston, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Defendants. George H. JENKINS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. HAWORTH, INC.; Haworth/New England, Inc.; Richard G. Haworth, and Edward J. Clark, Defendants. Nos. G79-134, G79-419. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.
Haworth v. Ruckmanpublic domain
436 P.2d 733 (1968) Daniel F. HAWORTH, Appellant, v. V.J. RUCKMAN, Individually and Dba Holiday Motel, and Bea De Moss, Respondents. Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1. Argued and Submitted January 4, 1968. Decided January 24, 1968. George M. Joseph, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Morrison & Bailey, and Tom P. Price, Port
Apodaca v. Haworthpublic domain
206 Cal.App.2d 209 (1962) FLAVIO APODACA et al., Individually and as Guardians ad Litem, etc., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BRYAN HAWORTH et al., Defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 10123. California Court of Appeals. Third Dist. July 27, 1962. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard & Coyle, Dudley Sheppard, William B. Boone, Borton, Petrini, Conron, Brown & Con
Haworth v. L'Hostepublic domain
GARRISON, Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Twenty-Fifth Judicial Court, Parish of Plaquemines recognizing plaintiffs Paul Haworth and David Dawson as owners of the following property and dismissing defendants’ Donald W. Eppley and Lester A. L’Hoste, Jr. reconventional demand on the basis of 30 years acquisitive prescription: “A certain strip or portion of ground, being a portion of Lo
Haworth v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.public domain
SOPER, Circuit Judge. The Trustee in Bankruptcy of the.Allied -Wood Products Company is seeking to set aside as invalid the liens of five chattel mortgages of the bankrupt corporation on the ground that they were not properly recorded under the General Statutes of North Carolina pertaining to the registration of chattel mortgages of *204domestic corporations. All of t
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of February 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
Joseph v. Statepublic domain
OPINION EASTAUGH, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A jailer owes its prisoners the duty of reasonable care to protect them from reasonably foreseeable harm, including self-inflicted harm. Rudolph Joseph committed suicide while he was imprisoned in a state jail. Was it error to require the jury in the resulting wrongful death case to excuse the state from its duty of reasonable care if the jury found that J
Hackensack Water Co. v. Borough of Haworthpublic domain
Quinn, President. These appeals bring up the assessments levied by the taxing district of the borough of Haworth, for *218the years 1938 and 1939, on that portion of the Oradell Reservoir of the Hackensack Water Company which is situated in Haworth. The 1938 assessment was fixed at $300,000 for land, and was affirmed by the Bergen County Board of Taxation. The company’s pe
Askew v. Wachovia Bankpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dr. Joseph Askew and Joseph Askew, Jr., appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askew v. Wachovia Bank of Delawa
Askew v. Wachovia Bankpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dr. Joseph Askew and Joseph Askew, Jr., appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askew v. Wachovia Bank of Delawa
Cynthia Sue Vaughn v. Joseph Patrick Vaughnpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 444444444444444 NO. 03-04-00030-CV 444444444444444 Cynthia Sue Vaughn, Appellant v. Joseph Patrick Vaughn, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. FM10153
Cynthia Sue Vaughn v. Joseph Patrick Vaughnpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00030-CV Cynthia Sue Vaughn, Appellant
916 F.2d 134 59 USLW 2239, 18 Fed.R.Serv.3d 184 Bobby STOTT; Joseph Register; Lonnie Michael Cayton, onbehalf of themselves and others similarlysituated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Howard H. HAWORTH, Individually, Defendant-Appellant,andJames G. Martin, Individually and in his official capacityas Governor of the State of North Carolina, etal., Defendants.Bobby STOTT; Joseph Register;
Riley v. Haworthpublic domain
Robinson, J. Action for damages for alleged breach of a contract to convey land. Complaint in three paragraphs to which demurrers were sustained. The first paragraph avers that on the 9th day of Hay, 1900, and prior .thereto, appellant, a farmer, was engaged in breeding and raising hogs and cattle, and had expended large sums of money in the purchase of the best stock; that he had purchased a farm, convenient
Suntrust Bank, N.A. v. John Northenpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge WYNN joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: In this bankruptcy case, in which John McCormick is the debtor, SunTrust Bank, N.A., filed a proof of claim for repayment of a loan that it claimed was secured by a deed of trust on two contig
Gayle v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.public domain
701 F.Supp.2d 556 (2010) Edley GAYLE, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., et al., Defendants. Joseph Adornetti, Plaintiffs, v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., et al., Defendants, Girolamo Vitale, Plaintiffs, v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., et al., Defendants. Nos. 06 Civ. 6956(PAC)(GWG), 06 Civ. 6195(PAC)(GWG), 06 Civ. 6956(PAC)(GWG). United States Distric