Cases

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge KEENAN joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Joseph Catone, Jr., of one count of making a false statement in connection with his receipt of federal workers’ compensation benefits, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

144 Cal.App.3d 868 (1983) 193 Cal. Rptr. 414 JOSEPH R. GRILLO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN SMITH et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. 30062. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. May 24, 1983. *870 COUNSEL Robinson & Robinson, Mark P. Robinson, Jr., and

(2008) Kevin J. GRILLO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. TEMPUR-PEDIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:05-410-JMH. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division, at Lexington. March 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH M. HOOD, Senior District Judge. <

16 N.J. 103 (1954) 106 A.2d 294 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH GRILLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SILVIO DE VITA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued June 7, 1954. Decided June 28, 1954. *105 Mr. George R.

DEASY, Bankruptcy Judge. The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) appeals from the following orders of the bankruptcy court: (1) the October 4, 2011 order (the “506(b) Order”) granting, in part, and denying, in part, the Motion of The Prudential Insurance Company of America for an Order Authorizing the Application of Payments Received during the Chapter 11 Cases to Payment of Postpetition Interest Pursuant to

104 A.2d 748 (1954) GRILLO v. SCHAPEROW. Ex. No. 9392. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 14, 1954. William H. Leslie, Jr., for plaintiff. Thomas J. Capalbo, for defendant. O'CONNELL, J. This action of assumpsit was tried in the superior court before a justice thereof sitting with a jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of

STAHL, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents multiple issues arising from a heavily contested Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. Stated simply, a secured creditor appealed to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit (“the BAP”) from the bankruptcy court’s orders determining its entitlement to postpetition interest (and thus the total amount of its claim) and confirming

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, District Judge. Plaintiffs Jack Kurtz (“Kurtz”), Joseph Grillo (“Mr. Grillo”), Vivian Grillo (“Mrs. Grillo”), Jeff Michaels (“Mr. Michaels”), Barbara Michaels (“Mrs. Michaels”), 31-11 30th Ave LLC (“31-11 30th Ave.”), Agrinios Realty Inc. (“Agrinios”), K.A.P. Realty Inc. (“K.A.P.”), Linda Davis (“Davis”), Peter Blidy (“Blidy”), Vasillios Chrysikos (“Chrysikos

On Motions for Rehearing PER CURIAM. We deny the motions for rehearing in this case, but withdraw our opinion filed on October 4, 2006, and substitute the following in its place. We grant the State’s petition for writ of certiorari and quash the May 8, 2006 order of the Broward Circuit Court, consolidating the pending criminal prosecution before it with ongoing proceedings in the Dade

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIAM WEST, § § Plaintiff Below, § No. 12, 2021 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § ACCESS CONTROL RELATED § C.A. No. N17C-11-137 ENTER

OPINION EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Kenneth Cender and Stephen Cender, were convicted in the Supreme Court of the State of New York upon a jury trial of the criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and the criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and are serving sentences imposed thereunder. Plaintiff Stephen Cender’s conviction has been unanimo

824 A.2d 11 (2002) MILLENCO L.P., Plaintiff, v. meVC DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON FUND I, INC., John M. Grillos, Larry J. Gerhard, Harold E. Hughes, Jr., and Chauncey F. Lufkin, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 19523. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted December 2, 2002. Decided December 19, 2002. *12 Joseph A. Rosenthal,

179 Conn. 388 (1979) ANGELO AFFINITO ET AL. v. JOHN L. DANIELS Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued December 4, 1979. Decision released December 25, 1979. COTTER, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, PETERS and HEALEY, JS. Albert R. Annunziata and John T. Grillo, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Joseph A. Licari, Jr., for the appellee (defe

398 Pa. Superior Ct. 264 (1990) 580 A.2d 1341 Concepcion L. RIVERA, Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick L. Rivera, Deceased, v. The PHILADELPHIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF ST. CHARLES BORROMEO, INC. a/k/a St. Charles Seminary and Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church. Appeal of the PHILADELPHIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF ST. CHARLES BORROMEO, INC. a/k/a St. Charles Seminary. Supreme Court of P

487 F.Supp.2d 940 (2007) In re SMARTALK TELESERVICES, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to: USDC Northern District of Texas Case No. 3:00-CV-2671-M (Liquidating Trustee). No. 2:00-MD-1315. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 22, 2007. *941 Maribeth Deavers, Isaac Brant Ledman & Teetor,

191 Conn. 453 (1983) STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSEPH STORLAZZI (11398) Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued April 7, 1983. Decision released September 13, 1983. HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA, GRILLO and BORDEN, JS. *454 John J. Keefe, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Hugh F. Keefe, for the appellant

190 Conn. 299 (1983) JOSEPH A. BECKMAN ET AL. v. JALICH HOMES, INC., ET AL. (10807) Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued March 31, 1983. Decision released June 7, 1983. PETERS, HEALEY, PARSKEY, GRILLO and BIELUCH, JS. *300 Anthony F. Slez, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Michael P. Lincoln,

Grillo, J. The crucial issue presented in this appeal is: Does the limitation of interest upon a condemnation award established by General Statutes § 37-3a violate the condemnee’s constitutional right to just compensation?1 *379On June 21, 1979, the defendant commissioner of transportation acquired by condemnation fiv

Speziale, C. J. These appeals were brought following a mistrial granted by the trial court at the defendants’1 request when the jury before which they were tried on conspiracy to commit arson, arson, and larceny charges2 became deadlocked. The defendants’ appeal raises only two substantial issues:3

191 Conn. 222 (1983) DONALD R. DUGUAY, JR., ET AL. v. RHODA J. HOPKINS ET AL. (10796) Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued March 9, 1983. Decision released August 23, 1983. HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA, GRILLO and BIELUCH, JS. Norman J. Voog, with whom, on the brief, were Donald C. Simmons and Mary M. Voog, for the appellants (p