Cases

Magdeline D. Coleman, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION By Order dated January 17, 2014, this Court sustained objections to the Second Interim and Final Application for Compensation *113and Reimbursement of Expenses (the "Final Application"),1 filed by the Law O

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUFE, United States District Judge Before the Court is Debtor Joseph Gras-so’s pro se appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s September 15, 2015 order granting motions for summary judgment filed by the appellees, Marshall J. Katz, Madison Capital Company, LLC, and Christine C. Shubert, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of Joseph Grasso. For the following reasons, the Bankruptcy Court

*217 MEMORANDUM GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court for consideration are (1) a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Marshall J. Katz (the “Katz Motion”),1 and (2) a Joint Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Madison Capital Company, LLC and

MEMORANDUM MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. Before this Court is the Application for Administrative Expenses dated April 2, 2013 (the “Application”), filed by Madison Capital Company, LLC (“Madison”). In response, Christine C. Shubert (the “Trustee”), the then Chapter 11 Trustee and now present Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of Joseph Grasso (the “Debtor”), filed an Objection dated Apri

MEMORANDUM MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION Now pending before this Court is the Second Interim and Final Application for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses of the Law Offices of Paul J. Win-terhalter, P.C. dated December 28, 2012 (the “Final Application”), wherein the Law Offices of Paul J. Winterhalter, P.C. (the “Firm”), counsel for Jose

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ORDER MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION This Memorandum is consistent with this Court’s Order dated June 12, 2013 [Docket No. 652] (the “Order”), granting the conversion of Joseph Grasso’s (“Debt- or” or “Grasso”) Chapter 11 case to Chapter 7 and is submitted pursuant to Local Rule 8001-l(b) to further expound upon the r

Memorandum MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION On October 16, 2012, this Court issued an Order ordering the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee (the “Trustee Order”) for the estate of the debtor, Joseph Grasso (the “Debtor”) for cause pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1), and in the best interest of creditors pursuant to § 1104(a)(2). On October 31, 2012, the

MEMORANDUM DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DETERMINING CERTAIN FACTS AS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 56(g) MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. Before this Court is an adversary proceeding wherein the Sherwin Williams Company (the “Movant”) seeks to have its claim against Joseph Grasso (the “Debt- or”) declared nondischargeable pursuant to §§ 523(a)(2)(A), 523(a)(4)

BLACK, Judge. Margaret and Michelle Grasso, individually and as purported cotrustees of the Olga Grasso Revocable Living Trust (Trust), challenge various orders entered by the trial court regarding the Trust. We reverse the cost/fee order entered on October 18, 2013, to the extent that it taxed costs against Margaret and Michelle individually in the amount of $7907.10 and rema

NORTHCUTT, Judge. In this litigation over a trust, Margaret and Michelle Grasso appeal the circuit court’s order on their motion to dismiss for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction and its order temporarily enjoining them from disposing of trust assets. We dismiss the appeal of the former order, and we affirm the latter. Olga Grasso, who for the most part is a Florida resident, created a trust wh

PER CURIAM: Michael Joseph Grasso seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutiona

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Kramer, J.), entered June 21, 2006 in Schenectady County, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In 1980, plaintiff purchased earrings from defendant, who is plaintiff’s nephew and owns a jewelry store in Oklahoma. Flaintiff allegedly paid $1,750 for the earrings believing them to be made of diamonds and white gold, and

Chief Justice Suttell, dissenting. The majority decries the lack of a clarion call signaling legislative intent and observes that it, therefore, must grapple with the sounds of silence. Ybt it hears a veritable symphony within that statutory silence. The first movement is a lively allegro of statutory references and cross-references in which t

McCarthy, J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered March 4, 2010 in Schenectady County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, among other things, granted petitioners’ motion to hold respondent in contempt, (2) from the judgment entered thereon, and (3) from an order of said court, entered September 27, 2010 in Schenectady County, which denied respondent’s motion for reconsideratio

McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered March 11, 2009 in Schenectady County, *1464which, among other things, granted petitioners’ application pursuant to CPLR 7511 to partially vacate an arbitration award. Joseph F. Grasso (hereinafter decedent) commenced an action against his brother, petitioner Nicholas J. Gr

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 12, 2010, which awarded counsel fees to claimant’s attorney. Claimant injured his right arm at work and applied for workers’ compensation benefits. A Workers’ Compensation Law *1061Judge awarded claimant benefits based upon the parties’ stipulation that claimant sustai

(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Nicholas GRASS a/k/a Nicky Grasso. Criminal Action No. 00-120. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 25, 2008. MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Nicholas Grass, a/k/a Nicky Grasso, was convicted of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of commitment of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated October 24, 2007, which, upon confirming an order of the same court (Orlando, S.M.), also dated October 24, 2007, which, after a hearing, found that he willfully violated a prior order of support, committed him to the custody of the Suffolk County Correctional Facility for a term of

500 F.Supp.2d 511 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael GRASSO. Criminal Action Nos. 00-51-1, 01-783-1. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 4, 2007. *512 Anne Whatley Chain, U.S. Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, PA, Gregory S. Hrebiniak, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States of America.</

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Grasso Enterprises, NERxD, and Wiley’s Pharmacy and Compounding Services are compounding pharmacies that prepare and sell customized compound drugs made in accordance with doctors’ prescriptions. Express Scripts, Inc. (“ESI”), is a pharmacy benefits manager that contracts with health plan sponsors and administrators to administer the phar