Cases

CORRECTED OPINION MAY, J. The defendant appeals his conviction for trafficking 200 to 400 grams of cocaine, possession of less than twenty grams of marijuana, and possession of paraphernalia (use). He argues the trial court erred in excluding the co-defendant’s statement, failing to sever the trial of his codefendant, and instracting the jury on willful blindness. We agree that the trial court erred in these

CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge. | defendant, Eugene Dix, (Dix), seeks relief from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Andrea and Jay Joseph, (the Josephs), in the amount of $18,488.90, plus interest and a proportionate amount of court costs. The trial court also ordered release of $6,000.00; held in the registry of the court, to the Josephs. We affirm and amend the trial court’s judgment.

479 S.E.2d 739 (1997) 267 Ga. 429 DIX v. The STATE. No. S96A1365. Supreme Court of Georgia. January 21, 1997. *741 Joseph S. Rhymer, Loganville, for Dix. Alan A. Cook, Dist. Atty., Covington, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, Jeffrey Ladd Foster, Anne Margaret Templeton, Ass

In re Dix, Eugene et al.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, Nos. 540-566, 545-291; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No(s). 02-CA-0008, 02-CA-0009. Not considered. Not timely filed.

PER CURIAM. In this appeal from a judgment and sentence for armed robbery, the appellant raises two issues. The first is an evidentia-ry issue at the joint trial of the appellant and his codefendant. The appellant contends that it was error to allow the State to present a taped statement of the only eyewitness to the crime, the convenience store clerk. The witness had difficulty in identifying the appellant’s codefendant a

[Cite as State v. Dix, 2014-Ohio-3330.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101007 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

249 Ga. 810 (1982) 294 S.E.2d 527 DIX v. ZANT. 38623. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided September 9, 1982. *812 Millard C. Farmer, Joseph M. Nursey, for appellant. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Daryl A. Robinson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. SMITH, Justice.</

584 F.Supp. 1052 (1984) Horace William DIX, Petitioner, v. Lanson NEWSOME, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Respondent. Civ. A. No. C80-826A. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 20, 1984. *1053 *1054 *1055 Joseph M. Nursey, Mill

156 Ga. App. 868 (1981) 275 S.E.2d 807 DIX v. THE STATE. 60669. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued September 10, 1980. Decided January 5, 1981. Frank P. Samford, III, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Margaret V. Lines, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

[Cite as Dix Rd. Property Mgt., L.L.C. v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-2310.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO DIX ROAD PROPERTY : APPEAL NO. C-210657 MANAGEMENT, LLC, TRIAL NO. 21CV-04708 : Plaintiff-Appellant,

McMueray, Presiding Judge. Defendant was indicted on one count of rape and one count of aggravated sodomy, occurring on September 5, 1978, as to a female named therein. He was also indicted on one count of rape and one count of aggravated sodomy performed on another female against her will on September 14, 1978. These two cases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned its verdict of not guilty as to the offenses of rape

In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ══════════ No. WR-84,327-01 ══════════ EX PARTE JOSEPH FRANCOIS JEAN, Applicant ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 1302120-A in the 230th District Court Harris County ═══════════════════════════════════════

[Cite as Dix Rd. Property Mgt., L.L.C. v. Thomas, 2019-Ohio-5366.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY DIX ROAD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT : LLC, : CASE NO. CA2019-07-126 Appellant, :

[Cite as Chasteen v. Dix Road Property Mgt., L.L.C., 2021-Ohio-463.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY BRADLEY CHASTEEN, : Appellee, : CASE NOS. CA2020-04-055 CA2020-04-056

OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph Farneti, J. Ordered that this application by petitioner for an order, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), granting leave to serve a late notice of claim upon respondents, and deeming the notice of claim served with the instant application timely, is hereby denied for the reasons set forth hereinafter. This is an action to recover for personal injurie

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. This case is about a drug deal gone sour, leading to a shooting and then to an extortion attempt. Deborah Johnson-Dix, Carlos Meyers, Darrell Walton, and Garrett Thompson were charged with possession and with conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute approximately one-half kilogram of cocaine. Johnson-Dix, Walton, Thompson, arid Carl A. Dawson,

Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00763-CR ——————————— JOSEPH PRESTIANO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Tina Hintz brought this diversity action against Defendants Leslie Jami-son, in his capacity as Dix Township Road Commissioner, and Dix Township, alleging that the defendants breached their duty to maintain safe roads and thus caused an automobile accident in which Hintz was injured. The jury found in

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs owners of an adult entertainment establishment that features nude dancing and permits customers to bring their own alcoholic beverages onto the premises, challenge the enactment of three local ordinances that ban public nudity, open containers of alcohol in public, and the possession of liquor in public accommodations. Plaintiffs argue that the p

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00032-CR ___________________________ MICHAEL JOSEPH GOWAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 30,832-C Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMOR