⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Joseph DeVuono”

District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 6× · 115 F. Supp. 3d 153; 32 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 367; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91348; 2015 WL 4254073
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action alleging employment discrimination by defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., and by defendant Joseph E. Devuono II, the manager of a Wal-Mart store in Lynn, Massachusetts. The plaintiff, Behi-ja Kahriman, was employed in several roles at the Lynn store from April 2002 until Februa
Devuono v. Mullerpublic domain
City of New York Municipal Court · 1926-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 126 Misc. 669; 214 N.Y.S. 557; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 656
Panken, J. This case presents two problems: First, whether or not the truck which collided with the plaintiff’s car Was operated in a careless and negligent manner.' The case also presents the question as to whether or not the plaintiff by his own action contributed to the occurrence of the accident. The second problem is whether or not the defendant Candee, Smith & Howland Co., Inc., assuming that the tru
Devuono v. Mullerpublic domain
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926-12-24 · Published · cited 0× · 128 Misc. 501; 219 N.Y.S. 83; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 806
Per Curiam. Judgment as to appellant Candee, Smith & Howland Co., Inc., reversed and complaint dismissed as to it, with thirty dollars costs, on the ground that defendant Muller was an independent contractor engaged by the defendant, appellant, by the day, and at the time of the accident Muller was on his way to the place of business of the corporate defendant, and not doing its work. All concur; present, D
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-02-14 · Published · cited 7× · 154 A.3d 875; 2017 WL 574926; 2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 31
OPINION BY JUDGE BROBSON In this negligence action, Appellant Ronhilde Gillingham (Gillingham) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County (trial court), which granted the County of Delaware’s (County) motion for summary judgment and dismissed Gillingham’s personal injury complaint with prejudice. In so doing, the trial court concluded that the County was immune from liabilit
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015-03-13 · Published · cited 16× · 780 F.3d 458; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3958; 2015 WL 1088796
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Words are slippery things. Take “malice,” its legal definitions alone can encompass: the intent to commit a wrongful act, reckless disregard for the law, ill will, wickedness of heart, and the intent to kill. See Black’s Law Dictionary 968-69 (7th ed.1999). But can malice’s fifty shades of meaning include “improper motive?” Former flight attendant Nancy Gray, convicted of providing false inf