Cases

GRIFFIS, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This Court considers a challenge to the circuit court’s decision to uphold a default judgment and related orders. We find no error and affirm. FACTS ¶ 2. In 2004, Christopher and Cynthia Ferrell bought a home in Lincoln County. They moved in the home with their children: Jam

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Joseph has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Joseph has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record ref

J. JONES, Justice. This appeal arises out of a divorce and custody dispute between Christopher Hopper and Suzanne Swinnerton. In 2005, Christopher filed suit on his own behalf, as well as that of his son and parents, against his wife, Suzanne, her parents, her Montana attorney, and other individuals, alleging a variety of claims sounding in tort. The district court dismissed all

*631OPINION1 Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice Appellant Joseph Anthony Smith challenges his conviction and punishment for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. This three-issue appeal divides the panel three ways on the issue of whether the trial court erred, during the punishment phase of trial, in charging the jury t

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Christopher Janson was sued by his landlord in Missouri state court for unpaid rent. The landlord’s retained law firm, Katharyn B. Davis, LLC (Davis), filed an' affidavit with the complaint which recited information received from its client. After a trial the state court entered judgment against Janson. He subsequently sued Davis in the Eastern District of M

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-1310 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-003711-AOS _____________________________ CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

03/13/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 10, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH RILEY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2018-C-1973 Angelita Blackshear Dalton, Judge _______________________________

Supreme Court No. 2024-59-Appeal. (PM 23-1866) Clarimundo DaSilva : v. : Christopher Smith et al. : ORDER The plaintiff, Clarimundo DaSilva, who is not represented by counsel, appeals from Superior Court judgments

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Christopher and Sandra Hintz (Appellants) appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal of their fourteen-count complaint against JPMorgan Chase Bank (Chase). We conclude that, other than their claim under the Real Estate Settlement Practices Act (RE SPA), the claims set forth in Appellants’ complai

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSEPH A. KENNEDY, No. 16-35801 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:16-cv-05694-RBL BREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton,

Keasler, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Keller, P.J., and Hervey, Richardson, Yeary, Newell, and Slaughter, JJ., joined. In the punishment phase of his aggravated-robbery trial, Joseph Smith presented evidence that he suffers from a severe drug addiction. The State asked for, and received, an instruction stating that "[v]oluntary intoxication does not constitute a defense to the

SAUNDERS, Judge. 11 This case arises out of a dispute between neighboring property owners over a right of passage. Plaintiffs, Lisa T. Scrantz and Joseph C. Scrantz (hereinafter “Lisa” and “Joseph,” individually, and collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Defendants, Marvin L. Smith and Dorothy Smith (hereinafter “Marvin” and “Dorothy,” individually, and collectively, “Appel-lees”). For

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0511 Filed August 21, 2024 CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH YENGER, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello County, Lucy J. Gamon, Judge. An applicant appeals the denial of postconviction relief. AFFIRMED. Alexa

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENNIS R. DOW, Bankruptcy Judge. Before this Court is the Motion for Refund of Undistributed Funds Held by the Chapter 13 Trustee (the “Motion”) filed by Christopher Blanchard Smith, Sr. and Hilda Mae Smith (the “Debtors”). In their Motion, the Debtors are requesting an Order that requires the Chapter 13 Trustee (the “Trustee”) to return funds to the Debtors that were received after the

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Christopher Gorog appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his amended complaint against Best Buy Co., Inc., and Napster, Inc., for breach of contract. We affirm. I. Background Gorog was the CEO of Roxio, Inc. In 2002, Roxio acquired the a

10/14/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 9, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER R. SMITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County No. 15-CR-10137 Tony A. Childress, Chancellor ___________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00356-COA CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH BLANCHARD APPELLANT v. TAMMIE LYNN BLANCHARD APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/19/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. SHEILA HAVARD SMALLWOOD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PEARL RIVER COUNTY CHANCERY

DUNCAN, J. In this criminal case, defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting and sentencing him for one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained following what he argues was an unlawful police detention. Defendant contends that the detention violated his right to be free from unreasonable

686 S.E.2d 443 (2009) ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL et al. v. WARD. No. A09A1398. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 9, 2009. Todd A. Brooks, Daniel A. Kiefer, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Atlanta, for Appellant. Christopher J. Hudson, Daniel W. Hamilton, Shepard, Plunkett, Hamilton & Boudreaux, Augusta, for Appellee. SMITH, Presiding Judge. <

OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice ’ In this legal malpractice cáse, appellant Joseph Pressil sued appellees-Jason A. Gibson, Clifford D. Peel, II, Andrew C. Smith, and Jason A. Gibson, P.C. d/b/a The Gibson Law Firm (collectively, the “Gibson Parties”) for negligence, gross negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty arising from the Gibson Parties’ representat