Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joseph A. Esposito”
12/12/2023 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 15, 2023 Session JENNIFER LYNN MORGAN ESPOSITO v. JOSEPH DIEGO ESPOSITO Appeal from the Chancery Court for Campbell County No. 2021-CV-22 Elizabeth C. Asbury, Chancellor No. E2022-01784-COA-R3-CV In th
Esposito v. Espositopublic domain
OPINION Justice FLAHERTY, for the Court. The parties to this appeal are former spouses, and the issue before us involves the property settlement agreement (the Agreement) that was entered into in connection with their divorce. This dispute centers around a single asset; a minority interest in Prime Time Manufacturing, Inc. The Agreement specified that the
Esposito v. City of Rochesterpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered December 7, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking, inter alia, to annul the determina
Pisciuneri v. Espositopublic domain
MOTTO, J., This matter is before the court on post-verdict motions filed by each of the parties. This case arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on April 14, 1997. On that date, the plaintiff was operating an automobile in a northerly direction on State Route 18 in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, while at the same time the defendant was operating her vehicle in a southerly direction on such
Esposito v. Simkins Industries, Inc.public domain
943 A.2d 456 (2008) 286 Conn. 319 Nicholas ESPOSITO et al. v. SIMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al. No. 18019. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued January 9, 2008. Decided April 1, 2008. *457 Joseph J. Passaretti, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Melissa A. Murello, for the appellant (defenda
255 B.R. 588 (2000) In re LAKE COUNTRY INVESTMENTS, Limited Liability Company, Debtors. Joseph A. Esposito, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. John E. Noyes, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 99-20287. Adversary No. 00-6057. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. September 19, 2000. *589 *590
Esposito v. Larigpublic domain
Esposito v Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04703) Esposito v Larig 2025 NY Slip Op 04703 Decided on August 20, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncor
Esposito v. Reapublic domain
In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Joan Glee-son appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated October 4, 1996, which deniéd her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and any cross claims insofar as asserted against her. *537Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted,
Esposito v. Isaacpublic domain
Esposito v Isaac (2025 NY Slip Op 04231) Esposito v Isaac 2025 NY Slip Op 04231 Decided on July 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorre
Esposito v. Espositopublic domain
In a matrimonial action, the parties appeal and cross-appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), dated April 9, 1986, which, inter alia, discharged the coreceivers (the parties’ respective attorneys) who had been appointed to sell the parties’ real properties pursuant to a judgment of divorce, appointed a new receiver to sell the properties at such price terms as the receiver deems proper, and prohibit
Esposito v. Larigpublic domain
Esposito v Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704) Esposito v Larig 2025 NY Slip Op 04704 Decided on August 20, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncor
Esposito v. Metropolitan Transportation Authoritypublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about March 25, 1998, to the extent that it denied the motion of defendants New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority to dismiss the complaint against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendants to renew their application after further discovery. On May 27, 1989, plaintiff Joseph Esposito, a New Yo
Esposito v. Western Power Sports, Inc.public domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 82-2-03220-9, George T. Shields, J., entered March 23, 1983. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Munson, C.J., and Mclnturíf, J.
People v. Espositopublic domain
People v Esposito (2020 NY Slip Op 05524) People v Esposito 2020 NY Slip Op 05524 Decided on October 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
People v. Espositopublic domain
People v Esposito (2020 NY Slip Op 06807) People v Esposito 2020 NY Slip Op 06807 Decided on November 18, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Esposito v. Statepublic domain
Michael Esposito v. State of Maryland, No. 1148, Sept. Term, 2023. Opinion by Tang, J. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – RES GESTAE – RES GESTAE; EXCITED UTTERANCES – ACTS AND STATEMENTS OF PERSON INJURED – IN GENERAL To make a statement admissible as an excited utterance, the proponent of the evidence must satisfy three requirements. “First, the proponent must establish that an exciting or startling event occurred, and that the declarant had personal knowledge of that event.” Curtis v. State, 259 Md.
Berg v. Esposito (In re Oxborrow)public domain
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order resolving an election dispute among creditors. I On September 28, 1984, debtor Kenneth D. Oxborrow filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101-1174 (West 1979 & Supp.1990). Oxborrow and others had operated an “
Esposito v. Township of Edisonpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D. Plaintiffs, seven patrolmen employed by the defendant, Township of Edison, appeal from a summary, judgment dismissing their age-discrimination complaint in which they asserted that the Township’s criteria for promotion to police sergeant disparately treated or disparately impacted upon patrolmen over the age of forty. Having carefully reviewed t
Plotkin v. Esposito-Plotkinpublic domain
Plotkin v Esposito-Plotkin (2023 NY Slip Op 02336) Plotkin v Esposito-Plotkin 2023 NY Slip Op 02336 Decided on May 3, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
Esposito v. Buonomepublic domain
642 F.Supp. 760 (1986) Joseph ESPOSITO, Plaintiff, v. Joseph BUONOME and Louis Pasquariello, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Officers in the Police Department of the Town of East Haven, Connecticut, Defendants. Civ. A. No. N-82-93 (TJM). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 8, 1986. *761 John R. W