Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joseph A Vena”
In re Venapublic domain
ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-371, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that JOSEPH A. VENA of ROSELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be reprimanded for violating RPC *3911.4(b)(failure to communicate with the clie
Norton v. Venapublic domain
Petition for certification is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Travis Wayne Vena v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as Sep 19 2017, 8:39 am precedent or cited before any court except for the CLERK purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals collater
Norton v. Venapublic domain
Petition for certification granted. (See 122 N. J. Super. 461).
Norton v. Venapublic domain
Per Curiam. In this negligence case the trial judge vacated a “friendly” judgment (B. 4:44) in favor of an infant entered after a settlement of the action. This was doné on plaintiffs’ motion and over defendants’ vigorous opposition. A subsequent plenary trial resulted in a jury verdict higher than the settlement (although somewhat suspect in itself because $2,000 or almost 25% of the verdict was to the father expressly
Vena v. Everettpublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * MURPHY, Circuit Judge. After examining Petitioner’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The court therefore orders the case submitted without oral argument. Joseph J.
Szeles v. Venapublic domain
729 A.2d 1064 (1999) Paul SZELES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph VENA, Defendant, and Joseph DeVirgilio, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 3, 1999. Decided June 2, 1999. *1065 David J. Ades, Matawan, for plaintiff-appellant. John C. Prindiville, Brick, for defendant-responde
Vena v. Statepublic domain
941 P.2d 33 (1997) Joseph J. VENA, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 95-304. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 25, 1997. *34 Sylvia Lee Hackl, State Public Defender, PDP; Peter H. Froelicher, Assistant Public Defender, argued, for Appellant. William U. Hill, Attorney General; Paul Rehur
DeMarzo v. Venapublic domain
330 Mass. 118 (1953) 111 N.E.2d 797 JOSEPHINE DeMARZO vs. BENJAMIN VENA. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. November 3, 1952. April 3, 1953. Present: QUA, C.J., LUMMUS, SPALDING, WILLIAMS, & COUNIHAN, JJ. Edward J. Barshak, for the defendant. Samuel Meline, (Joseph A. Furnari with him,) fo
Wells, Amos Joseph Iiipublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,070 AMOS JOSEPH WELLS, III, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 1405275R IN THE 432ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TARRANT COUNTY WALKER, J., delivered the opinion of
Gonyer v. Vane Line Bunkering, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ request for leave to amend the complaint to name Eric Bridges and Mark Mills as additional lead Plaintiffs. (Doc. Nos. 51, 67.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion to amend is deemed made and granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Christopher Gonyer filed
Mullins v. Premier Nutrition Corp.public domain
ORDER RULING ON EVIDENTIARY MOTIONS AND DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kathie Sonner1 contends defendant Premier Nutrition Corporation peddles what amounts to worthless snake oil: Joint Juice, a liquid dietary supplement containing glucosamine hydrochloride (“glucosamine”) and chon
Mac Govern v. Connollypublic domain
637 F.Supp. 111 (1986) John Mac GOVERN, Raymond Shamie, Constance Henry, Joseph Malone, Casper Serijan, Alice Serijan, Donna Bowman, Robert Lerner, George Lane, and John T. Delaney v. Michael J. CONNOLLY, in his Capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John A. Brennan, Jr., in his Capacity as Senate Chairman of the Joint Special Committee on Redistricting, James T. Brett, in his Capacity as House Chairman of the Joint Special C
Brown v. Baileypublic domain
210 S.W.3d 397 (2006) Amelia BROWN, Ashley Plummer, Zina Plummer, Oneta Richardson, and Vena St. John, Respondents, v. Greg BAILEY, M.D., Appellant, and Tenet Health System d/b/a Forest Park Hospital, Olexandr Krinochkin, Michael Mandis, Pam Woods, Lee Hanson, Charles Wetherington, Defendants. No. ED 86387. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. November
CORDIS CORPORATION v. STEFANO CONVERTINO, etc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1677 Lower Tribunal No. 18-33060 ________________ Cordis Corporation, Appellant,
Glassman v. St. Joseph Hospitalpublic domain
631 N.E.2d 1186 (1994) 259 Ill. App.3d 730 197 Ill.Dec. 727 Gloria GLASSMAN, individually and as special administrator of the Estate of Sheldon Glassman, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (David O. Monson, M.D., and Milton Weinberg, Jr., M.D., Defendants-Appellees). No. 1-90-1456. Appe
CORDIS CORPORATION v. STEPHEN YOUNGpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1670 Lower Tribunal No. 19-18372 ________________ Cordis Corporation, Appellant,
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1668 Lower Tribunal No. 19-19765 ________________ Cordis Corporation, Appellant,
CORDIS CORPORATION v. NICOLE WILLIAMS, etc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1672 Lower Tribunal No. 18-24655 ________________ Cordis Corporation, Appellant,
CORDIS CORPORATION v. JESSICA JOHNSON-WILLIAMSpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1675 Lower Tribunal No. 18-27247 ________________ Cordis Corporation, Appellant,