Cases

JOSEPH, C. J. Defendant was charged with illegal possession of a deer. ORS 496.992. The state appeals from a trial court order allowing his motion to suppress. ORS 138.060(3). The issue is whether the warrantless search of his pickup was proper under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. At approximately 6:00 p.m. on February 10, 1989, Oregon State Police trooper Duggins, a fish and game officer,

JUSTICE FREEMAN, specially concurring: I agree with the majority that the five-year limitations period of section 13 — 205 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/13 — 205 (West 1996)) applies to this case. However, I believe that this result is best reached through a straightforward application of long-settled legal princ

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0212p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JODI TAPPLY, JEANNETTE BUSCHMAN, MICHAEL │ PARTIPILO, BARBARA LESTER, and VI

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

DECISION and ORDER MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge. This is a civil rights action. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have engaged in surveillance in violation of the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. The motions presently before the court relate to discovery sought by the plaintiffs from certain defendants. In case 76-C-746, the defendant Harold A. Breier, chief of police of t

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING JUSTICE O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the court: A petition for rehearing was filed by intervenor-appellant Cosmopolitan National Bank of Chicago and appellees Oak Park Bank and Joseph Sadacca responded. After reviewing the record as well as the petition and response, we deny the pe

691 F.Supp.2d 844 (2010) AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P., Ferrellgas L.P., Titan Energy Partners, Heritage Operating, LP, and Inergy Propane, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BP AMERICA, INC., BP Corporation North America Inc., BP International Services Company, BP Products North America Inc., BP Energy, and BP America Production Company, Defendants. No. 08 CV 981. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Divisi

171 Ill. App.3d 644 (1987) 525 N.E.2d 852 In re APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND EX OFFICIO COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY (Cosmopolitan National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Oak Park Bank, as Trustee, et al., Appellees (S.L. Cribare et al., Petitioners)). Nos. 87-0290, 87-0291 cons. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division).</

125 Ill. App.3d 808 (1984) 466 N.E.2d 673 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIMOTHY M. SCHUNING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-83-0802. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed July 19, 1984. *809 G. Joseph Weller, of State Appellate Defender's Office, of Elgin, for

617 N.E.2d 46 (1993) 246 Ill. App.3d 860 186 Ill.Dec. 807 William ROHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Gilbert and Patricia PASSARELLA, Dorothy Passarella, 707 Devon Corp., an Illinois corporation, and Park Ridge Travel Bureau, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Nos. 1-91-4052, 1-92-0107. Appellate Court of I

DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. Background This action involves the prescription drug, Cerivistatin, which was marketed in the United States under the brand name Baycol. Cerivistatin is a member of a class of drug known as statins, that have been routinely prescribed to lower the lipid levels of individuals with high cholesterol

DECISION and ORDER MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this action are Menominee Indians and members of an organization known as Determination of Rights and Unity of Menominee Stockholders (“DRUMS”). They allege that the defendants have violated the plaintiffs’ first and fourteenth amendment rights by preventing the plaintiffs from assembling for the “purposes of peacefully, and in a non

PRESIDING JUSTICE HARRISON delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, HPI Health Care Services, Inc. (HPI), appeals from that portion of a judgment of the circuit court of Jefferson County which dismissed counts IV, VI, VII, and VIII of its second amended complaint. The circuit court’s judgment of dismissal was entered purs

DECISION and ORDER MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge. The plaintiff, a resident of California, brings this action against certain present and former officials of the town of Caledonia, Racine County, Wisconsin, and others, including the sheriff of Racine County. This decision will consider various motions now before the court. The complaint states that the plaintiff operated a mobile