Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XII JOSELITO CRUZ CAMPOS Revisión Administrativa procedente del Recurrente Departamento de Corrección y v. TA2025RA00293 Rehabilitación, División

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X JOSELITO CRUZ CAMPOS Revisión de Decisión Recurrente Administrativa procedente del Departamento de V.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I JOSELITO CRUZ CAMPOS Revisión Judicial procedente del RECURRENTE Departamento de KLRA202400520 Corrección y Rehabilitación V.

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL JOSELITO CRUZ CAMPOS REVISIÓN ADMINISTRATIVA Recurrente procedente de la División de Remedios v. KLRA202400370 Administrativos

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL X JOSELITO CRUZ REVISION CAMPOS ADMINISTRATIVA procedente de la Recurrente KLRA202400621 División de Remedios

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XII JOSELITO CRUZ Certiorari CAMPOS procedente del Tribunal de Primera Peticionario Instancia, Sala Superior de V.

OPINION OF THE COURT Mark I. Partnow, J. Defendant Fénix Car Service Corp. moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3212, granting it summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Joselito Rivera on the ground that there are no triable issues of fact with respect to its alleged vicarious liability for the active negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle in the underlying personal injury action.

DECISION AND ORDER FRANK P. GERACI, JR., District Judge. I. Introduction This case involves allegations that the Defendants, City of Rochester and two municipal officials, pursuant to an officially promulgated policy, violated the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs, eight Hispanic, City of Rochester employees who claimed that they were not permitted to speak Spanish during their casual, n

270 F.Supp.2d 255 (2003) Rafael GARCIA SANCHEZ, et als., Plaintiff, v. Jose R. ROMAN ABREU, et als., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1543(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 10, 2003. *257 Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Alice M. Velazquez, Aldarondo & L

TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA En la causa de epígrafe, el apelante, Sr. Félix L. Rodríguez Colón, solicita que revoquemos dos sentencias emitidas el 30 de junio de 2004 por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Arecibo, en las que se le declaró culpable de robo domiciliario, Art. 173 del Código Penal, 33 LPRA see. 4279 e infracción a los Artículos 5.04 y 5.15 de la Ley de Armas, 25 LPRA sees. 458c y 458n.

Beck, J. The defendant was convicted of trafficking in over 200 grams of cocaine, two counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (a motor vehicle), and possession of a firearm without a firearm identification card. (The jury found the codefendant, Luis Martinez, not guilty of trafficking and posses*624sion of a firearm.) On appeal, the defendant argues that (1

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This decision resolves post-trial motions filed by defendant Limet Vasquez (“Vasquez”). Between March 10, 2014 and April 29, 2014, the Court presided over the jury trial of Vasquez and co-defendant Carlos Urena (“Urena”).1 Urena and Vasquez are among the 76 people charged in a series of superseding indictments wit

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Yanitsia Irizarry Méndez, como candidata a la alcaldía del Municipio de Aguadilla por el Partido Nuevo Progresista Recurrida v. Julio Roldán Concepción, alcalde electo del Municipio de Aguadilla por el Partido Popular Democrático, Eliezer Ríos Santiago, candidato a la alcaldía de Aguadilla por el Partido Independentista Puertorriqueño, Juan Carlos Rosario

CYR, Circuit Judge. Three youthful defendants, Saul Mangual-Corchado (“Mangual”), Luis Antonio Ramirez-Ynoa (“Ramirez”) and Ernesto Cirilo-Munoz (“Cirilo”), appeal their respective convictions relating to the intentional killing of an on-duty police officer during the commission of a drug offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 848(e)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. § 2. Mangual and Ramirez likewise appeal their carjacking convictions, see i

GEWIN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Carlos Arcentales was found guilty by a jury on both counts of an indictment charging him with importing cocaine 1 and possessing the same with intent to distribute. 2 On appeal he argues that he is entitled to a new trial becaus

139 F.3d 34 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Saul MANGUAL-CORCHADO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ernesto CIRILO-MUNOZ, a/k/a Nesty, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Luis Antonio RAMIREZ-YNOA, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 96-1307, 96-1308, 96-1476. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit.