Cases

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-15-00350-CR MARTHA ACEVEDO, § Appeal from the Appellant, § 243rd District Court v.

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Puerto Rico Ports Authority’s motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 186.) Having considered the motion and plaintiffs’ response, (Docket No. 206), the Court DENIES defendant PRPA’s motion. DISCUSSION I. Procedural Background On October 16, 2009, plaintiff Daniel Grajales (“Graj

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Sarah Piazza Aguirre (“Piazza”) brings this action against Mayaguez Resort and Casino, Inc. (“MRC”), alleging employment discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 *345

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1377 JOSE A. RIVERA-PINA; DENISE MALAVE-FONSECA; ELIZABETH BRUNO-ORTEGA; EUNICE A. ROSARIO-ABREU; GUILLERMO E. DE LA CRUZ-ABREU; IRIS N. FLORES-CARABALLO; JAVIER RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ; JUAN C. ROMANACCE-RODRIGUEZ; LISBETH DE LEON-MARQUEZ; LUZ J. GARCIA-ORTIZ; MARISELA FIGUEROA-VEGA; RICHARD RIVERA-CANALES; ROLANDO A. LOPEZ-SOSA; RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ; HOWARD DE LEON-ROD

MEMORANDUM OPINION [Resolving ECF Nos. 31, 58, 67, 85, 86, 87 ] Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION It is an old adage that “no one has the right to be sorry for [themselves] for a misfortune that strikes everyone.”1 Here, lives of loved ones have been lost, while many others were injured. This i

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Post-Hearing Memorandum In Support Of The Imposition Of A Specific Remedy As A Result Of Non-Compliance And In Support Of Petition For Contempt filed by Suiza Dairy, Inc. (hereinafter “Suiza’s Post-Hearing Memorandum”), Docket No. 2225; (b) Vaquería Tres Monjitas, Inc.’s Memorandum O

345 F.Supp.2d 174 (2004) Jose Luis RAMÍREZ-DE LEÓN et al., Plaintiffs v. Esteban MUJICA-COTTO et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-2648CHL/ADC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 17, 2004. *176 Roberto O. Maldonado-Nieves, Roberto O. Maldonado Nieves Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff or Petitioner. N

257 F.Supp.2d 477 (2003) Rosa M. Lugo TORRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Walter Torres MALDONADO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 97-2440 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2003. Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR, for plaintiffs. Luis E. Pabon-Roca, Grisselle Gonzalez-Negron, Faccio &a;

270 F.Supp.2d 189 (2003) Edna S. Delgado GREO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Marcelo TRUJILLO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1389 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 2, 2003. *190 Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR,

Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. We granted review to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal regarding whether a trial court has the duty to instruct a jury to consider a criminal defendant’s out-of-court statements with caution when the statements at issue form the basis of a prosecution for making criminal threats. We also asked the parties to brief wheth

591 F.3d 209 (2009) Sanjuanita SEPULVEDA; Angela Salinas; Jose Sanchez Rivera, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated; David Bailey; Sean Bradham; Clara Bennett; Victor Burgos Rivera; Vence Byrd; Hada Cardenas; Angel Colmenares; Yachira Davila; Hector Esmurria; Garvina Gibbs; Margaret Gibbs; Roger Gonzales; Patricia Gutierrez; Selena Hancock; Cesar Hernandez; Pattie Hinton; William Jackson; Thomas Jacobs; Robin Lott; Maricruz Luyando; Maria

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO El Pueblo de Puerto Rico Recurrido Certiorari v. José A. Cedeño Laclaustra 2002 TSPR 111 Peticionario 157 DPR ____ Número del Caso: CC-1999-0086 Fecha: 23 de agosto de 2002 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones: Circuito Regional VII Juez Ponente: Hon.

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

300 F.Supp.2d 321 (2004) Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Sila María CALDERON SERRA, et als, Defendants. No. CIV. 79-004(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 26, 2004. *322 Manuel A. Rodriguez-Banchs, Carlos V. Garcia-Gutierrez, Jose R. Roque-Velazquez, Civil Action and Education Corporation,

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

609 F.2d 603 4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1197, 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 570UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jose Esteban CAMBINDO VALENCIA, Jose Manuel EscobarOrjuella, Federico Gonzalez, Alfonso Velasco, Mario Caicedo,Edgar Enrique Moreno Ortiz, Julio Francisco Bermudez Prado,Rafael Flores Valencia, Carmen Vivas, Freddie Williams,Jesus Losada, and Rosalinda Losada, Appellants. Nos. 759 to 763, 765 t

ORDER SPEARS, District Judge. On this 11th day of February, 1981, came on for consideration the defendants’ motions to tax costs in the above styled and numbered causes, and the plaintiffs’ objections thereto. This consolidated case was filed to challenge the constitutionality of the Bexar County Hospital District’s decision to relocate, maternity and nursery services from downtown San Antonio. On Februar