Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30309 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:98-cr-00572- MO-8 JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Efigenio Aispuro-Aispuro, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30310

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS MARCIA S. KRIEGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendant’s (“Avanza”) Motion to Dismiss (# 14), the Plaintiffs’ response (# 17), and Avanza’s reply (# 20). FACTS Although lengthy, the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (# 3) describes a straightforward factual sc

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1279 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1280 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendants Randall Martinez (“Martinez”) and Marcos Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) appeal from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York by Sandra L. Townes, Judge, and defendants Henry Fiorentino and Jose Tejada appeal from judgments entered in th

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

Filed 2/13/19 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B287255 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA095527) v. ORDER MODIFYING JOSE ANGEL MARTINE

Filed 1/24/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B287255 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA095527) v. JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of

256 F.Supp.2d 1345 (2003) SINALTRAINAL, the Estate of Isidro Segundo Gil, Plaintiffs, v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Sinaltrainal, Jorge Humberto Leal Plaintiffs, v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Defendants. Sinaltrainal, Juan Carlos Galvis, Plaintiffs, v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Defendants. Sinaltrainal, Luis Eduardo Garcia, Alvaro Gonzalez, and Jose Domingo Flores, Plaintiffs, v. The Co

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________________ No. 12-2328 MYRNA COLON-MARRERO; JOSEFINA ROMAGUERA AGRAIT Plaintiffs - Appellees v. EDWIN MUNDO-RIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the New Progressive Party (NPP) Defendant - Appellant EDER E. ORTI

ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 4089429 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 3887778 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF EEOC’S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES NORTHERN CALIFORNIA’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS GARY S. AUSTIN, United States Magistrate Judge. On July 27, 2009, Defendants ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Services, Inc., and ABM Janitorial Northern California (“ABM”) filed the instant motion. Defendant’s seek an order to compel P

168 Cal.App.4th 261 (2008) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PEDRO ALEXANDER ZEPEDA GARCIA et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. D049650. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. November 14, 2008. As modified November 24, 2008. *268 Doris M. Frizzell, under appointment by the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00542-CR Jose DeJesus Cuevas, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 12402, HONORABLE CHARLOTTE HINDS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION A

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00542-CR Jose DeJesus Cuevas, Appellant v.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00318-CR IN RE Isaias PAZ-ESTRADA, et al. Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodrig

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 21, 2024 No. 04-23-00318-CR IN RE Isaias PAZ-ESTRADA, et al. Original Proceeding 1 ORDER On April 4, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

OPINION AND ORDER LAFFITTE, Chief Judge. Before the Court is defendant United States of America’s (“United States”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1).1 For the following reasons, the Court grants defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND On April 28, 1994, the United States Postal Services (