Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jose M Hernandez”
Jose M. Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
LEVAL, Circuit Judge: Jose M. Hernandez appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Murtha, C. J.), denying his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court held that Hernandez was not entitled to relief on his claim of ineffectiveness of counsel because he could not establish that
Alamo, Jose M v. Hernandez, Sarah Mpublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI JOSÉ M. ÁLAMO CERTIORARI Procedente de Tribunal Recurrido de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de v. KLCE202400140 Bayamón Civil núm
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II JOSÉ M. MALDONADO Apelación HERNÁNDEZ Y TERESA procedente del GARCÍA CENTENO Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelante Superior de
Hernandez v. Grando's LLCpublic domain
BOHNHOFF, Judge. {1} Plaintiff Jose M. Hernandez, an employee of Creed, Inc. (Creed), injured himself while exiting a commercial truck that Creed had leased from Defendant Grando's, LLC (Grando's). After Hernandez brought suit against Grando's based on theories of negligence, strict product liability, and breach of implied warranty, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Grando's and
State v. Lixandra Hernandez and Jose Sanchez(075444)public domain
Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. New Jersey provides a broad range of discovery to an accused in a criminal case under Rule 3:13-3. This open-file approach is intended to ensure fair and just trials. Here, the issue is not whether defendants have a right to discovery of the prosecutor’s file in their case, but whether they
United States v. Guerra-Hernandezpublic domain
ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq., judicial officers are required to release defendants arrested for federal offenses on personal recognizance or an unsecured appearance bond, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b); set the least restrictive conditions necessary to ensure defendants’ appearance at all court proceedings, 18 U.S.C. §
Hernandez v. Spearmanpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 16, 2017 No. 04-15-00695-CV John M. DONOHUE, Appellant v. Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez,
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 9, 2017 No. 04-15-00695-CV John M. DONOHUE, Appellant v. Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez, Appellee
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-15-00695-CV John M. DONOHUE, Appellant v. Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez,
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00695-CV John M. DONOHUE, Appellant v. Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez,
Jose Hernandez v. Charles Greinerpublic domain
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal of the denial of a writ of habeas corpus endeavors to present the issue of whether the Sixth Amendment/due process right to counsel applies to a discretionary appeal from an intermediate state appellate court to a state’s highest court after a state court has exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal. Jose Hernandez appeals from
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 29, 2015 No. 04-15-0069
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 26, 2016 No. 04-15-00695-CV John M. DONOHUE, Appellant v. Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ, Deputy Matt Krueger,
John M. Donahue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 13, 2015 No. 04-15-0069
Martinez v. Hernandezpublic domain
SALTER, J. Julio J. Martinez (“Martinez”) appeals a final judgment in favor of: the City of Hialeah (“City”); the City’s incumbent Mayor, Carlos Hernandez (“Hernandez”);, the City Clerk for the City of.Hialeah, Marbelys L. Rubio-Fatjo; and the Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections, Christina White. The legal issue raised by Martinez in his circuit
John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinezpublic domain
/J. -7 7- 20l5tKC30 AH SrsB 30 0 3 Z-O o S/9f^ ^/yrO Jios'- So 3 7 "•"HEHlTTttlltgK. /Lc: ^o-cc : s /yi//^/0>fs^ 3- cc. y- ^ yCe.iu Ayo^yc^ yy^f '^e
OPINION KENNEDY, Judge. {1} This interlocutory appeal requires the Court to decide whether NMSA 1978, Section 73-2-21(E) (2003), regarding the standard of review in an appeal to the district court from a decision by the commissioners of an acequia, violates either article XVI, section 5 or the equal protection clause o
Hernandez v. Indymac Bankpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discreti
In Re Hernandezpublic domain
468 B.R. 396 (2012) In re Jose J. HERNANDEZ, Debtor. No. 11-15921-MM7. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California. March 19, 2012. *398 Jorge Halperin, Law Offices of Jorge Halperin, San Diego, CA, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION MARGARET M. MANN, Bankruptcy Judge. Collect Access, LLC ("Collect") broug