Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jose Luis Gutierrez”
Jose Luis Gutierrez-DelaCruz v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00974-CR JOSE LUIS GUTIERREZ-DELACRUZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas
Jose Luis Gutierrez-DelaCruz v. Statepublic domain
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed July 20, 2017 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-16-00974-CR ____________ JOSE LUIS GUTIERREZ-DELACRUZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 248th
Jose Luis Gutierrez v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00737-CR Jose Luis GUTIERREZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Jose Luis Gutierrez v. Alberto R. Gonzalespublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Gary M. Spraker, an attorney, engaged in a pattern of misconduct in immigration cases, which, according to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, “tainted the representation of some 50 clients, many of whom faced imminent legal consequences attaching to their entitlement to stay in this country.”
Gutierrez-Delacruz, Jose Luispublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,649-01 EX PARTE JOSE LUIS GUTIERREZ-DELACRUZ, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1366726-A IN THE 248TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Articl
LABARGA, C.J. *620Petitioner Monica A. Gutierrez ("Monica"), together with her parents Javier and Monica E. Gutierrez (collectively "Petitioners"), seeks review of the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Vargas v. Gutierrez , 176 S
State v. Jose Luis Sanchezpublic domain
SUBSTITUTE OPINION THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED FEBRUARY 17, 2017, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN GUTIERREZ, Judge Jose Luis Sanchez appeals from his judgments of conviction for two counts of sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years and five counts of lewd conduct with a child under sixteen involving two different victims. Specifically, Sanchez arg
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-987 _____________________________ JOSE LUIS DURAN, Appellant, v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, and MARGARITA GUTIERREZ, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from Florida Department of Revenue. Ann Coffin, Director, Child Support Program. February 21, 201
United States v. Jose Gutierrezpublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Jose Rodriguez Gutierrez and Manuel Perez Sanchez were charged together with drug trafficking offenses. Rodriguez Gutierrez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, and Perez Sanchez was convicted by a jury on one count of conspiracy to distribute and five counts of distribution or possession with intent to distribute. Perez
GUTIERREZ Et Al. v. HILTI, INC.public domain
McFadden, Presiding Judge. Husband and wife Jose A. Gutierrez and Selene Perez appeal from the grant of summary judgment to Hilti, Inc. in their consolidated actions for Gutierrez's personal injury and Perez's loss of consortium. They allege in their actions that they were harmed by Hilti's negligence in selling, through one of its retail outlets, a concrete anchor without either the in
Loya v. Gutierrezpublic domain
OPINION VANZI, Judge. {1} In this case, the issue before us is whether the County of Santa Fe (the County) has a duty to defend or indemnify a tribal police officer who, while exercising his authority as a commissioned County sheriffs deputy, unlawfully arrested a non-Indian person within the exterior boundaries of the Pueblo of Pojoaque (the Pueblo). The district court
Vargas, M.D. v. Gutierrezpublic domain
ROTHENBERG, J. Jose Luis Vargas, M.D., and Jose Luis Vargas, M.D., P.A. (collectively, “Dr. Vargas”) appeal.the trial court’s denial of their motion for a directed verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial. We affirm the denial of Dr. Vargas’s motion for a directed verdict but reverse and remand for a new trial based on the plaintiffs’ violation of the “one expert per speci
United States v. Gutierrez-Fariaspublic domain
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Jose Luis Gutierrez-Farias (“Gutierrez”) appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), & 846. We affirm. Gutierrez arrived at a United States Border Patrol checkpoint driving a'white pic
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Jose Luis Rodriguez-Gutierrez was charged with deportability under 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(1)(B) (Supp.1994). The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) determined that Rodriguez was deportable. The IJ denied Rodriguez’s applications for suspension of deportation and adjustment of status, but granted voluntary departure. Rodriguez appealed the denial of suspension of deportat
Gutierrez v. Joypublic domain
502 F.Supp.2d 352 (2007) Oman GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, v. Debra R. JOY, et al., Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 6643(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 27, 2007. *353 *354 *355 Oman Gutierrez, Beacon, NY, Pro se. Jose Luis Velez, State of Ne
United States v. Castro-Castropublic domain
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alejandro Castro-Castro pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with illegal reentry into the United States following deportation and subsequent to a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1) (20
United States v. Perez-Gutierrezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Jose Luis Perez-Gutierrez appeals his conviction pursuant to a conditional guilty plea and his sentence for one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. Perez-Gutierrez’s argument that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct
NUMBER 13-22-00172-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOSE LUIS ROBLES A/K/A JOSE ROBLES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 103rd District Co
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order by the Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicles (DMV) that suspended his driving privileges on the ground that he knowingly provided false information, in violation of ORS 809.310(3)(a), when he applied for an Oregon driver license. An administrative law judge (ALJ) upheld the suspension. A detailed recitation of the facts would not benefit
State v. Jose Luis Sanchezpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 43293/43294 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2017 Opinion No. 16 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: February 17, 2017 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) JOSE LUI