Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jose Ibanez”
State v. Jose Angel Ibanezpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00832-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Jose Angel Ibanez, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 096798, HONORABLE ANNA M. BOLING, JUDGE PRESIDING DISSENTING OPINION
State v. Jose Angel Ibanezpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00832-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. <
State v. Jose Angel Ibanezpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00832-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Jose Angel Ibanez, Appellee FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY, NO. 096798, HONORABLE ANNA M. BOLING, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
State v. Jose Angel Ibanezpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00832-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. <
People v. Ibanezpublic domain
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.), rendered on or about March 10, 2000, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.
Dunman, Joshua v. Ibanez, Jose A.public domain
Dismissed and Opinion filed February 13, 2003 Dismissed and Opinion filed February 13, 2003. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals<
United States v. Ibanez-Aguilarpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** On October 1, 1999, appellant IbanezAguilar entered a guilty plea to one count of manufacturing more than 100 plants of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). On January 18, 2000, the district court sentenced IbaneznAguilar to the statutory minimum mandatory five-year prison term. IbanezAguilar appeals his sentence, imposed pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(vii)
United States v. Ibanez-Ibarrapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Manuel Ibanez-Ibarra appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to *319being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ibanez-Ibarra’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his sentencing enhancement based on a prior felony conviction remains foreclosed after United States v.
NUMBER13-13-00291-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE ROGELIO ALANIZ, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by C
United States v. Zavalapublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is REMANDED. Defendants-Appellants Mariluz Zavala and Jose Ibanez appeal from the sentences imposed for various offenses, including conspiracy to smuggle aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A). Their appeal challenges only the two-level enhancement to their base offense level under th
United States v. Zavalapublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is REMANDED. Defendants-Appellants Mariluz Zavala and Jose Ibanez appeal from the sentences imposed for various offenses, including conspiracy to smuggle aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A). Their appeal challenges only the two-level enhancement to their base offense level under th
Romeo Alberto Ibanez-Barrera v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-23-00011-CR Romeo Alberto IBANEZ-BARRERA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 3
Ramero Alberto Ibanez-Barrera v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00011-CR Romeo Alberto IBANEZ-BARRERA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Ap
The State of Texas v. Santiago Salomon Ibanezpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-24-00241-CR ———————————— THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. SANTIAGO S
Romeo Alberto Ibanez-Barrera v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00011-CR Romeo Alberto IBANEZ-BARRERA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Felix Mejia-Castillo appeals, following a jury trial, from a criminal sentence imposed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (David N. Edelstein, Judge). Mejia-Castillo makes two arguments: (1) that the district court wrongly denied him a two-point reduction for his acceptance of res
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: This case began in November 1991 with an investigation by Houston police and IRS agents into a narcotics conspiracy involving approximately 178 kilograms of cocaine. The five defendant-appellants, Wisting Fierro, Olga Martinez, Jesus Serna, Jaime Ibanez and Jose Grajales, were charged in a January 8, 1992 superseding indictment with: Count 1: <
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 26, 2025 No. 04-25-00732-CR In re Romeo Alberto IBANEZ-BARRERA, Relator Original Proceeding 1 ORDER Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valen
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00732-CR In re Romeo Alberto IBANEZ-BARRERA, Relator Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justi
Jose Alberto Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-10-00205-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JOSE ALBERTO RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County,