Cases

OPINION CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this case, defendant Jose Espinal moves in the interest of justice to dismiss the indictment against him for prosecutorial misconduct. In particular, he alleges that the government violated his rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Gonzalez’s motion to suppress contraband and his post-arrest statements. (Docket No. 28.) The United States responded to defendant Gonzalez’s motion to suppress, Docket No. 32, and defendant Gonzalez replied, Docket No. 34. The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Bruce J. McGiverin. (Docket No. 30.) The magistr

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., *867 the defendants Jose A. Espinal and YRC Worldwide, Inc., doing business as New Penn Motor Express, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated March 12, 2014, as granted, that branch of the plaint

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are defendants Rafael Espinal-Mieses ("Espinal")'s and Francisco Batista-Reyes ("Batista")'s respective motions for application of the safety valve provision set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) (" section 3553(f)," or "statutory safety value") and U.S.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated December 3, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment. *524Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 32

634 F.3d 655 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose D. ESPINAL, also known as Nano, Cesar David Valdez-Castro, also known as David, also known as Cesar D. Valdez-Castro, also known as Malicia, Defendants, Santo Laiz, also known as Martin, Defendant-Appellant.[*] Docket No. 09-4344-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: January

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 8, 2001 THOMAS K. KAHN No.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), rendered November 3, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and certain statements made by him to law enforcement off

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered June 16, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to a indeterminate term of imprisonment of from eight and one-half years to life, unanimously affirmed. This prosecution involves a multiple defendant indictment alleging several sales of heroin. During one of the sales, d

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered July 27, 1990, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. *912Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigne

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Edwin Caballero-Espinal pleaded guilty to one count of illegally reentering the United States after having been deported following his conviction of a violent felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). In a hearing on February 11, 2005, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.) sentenced defendant to a term of 46 months’ imprisonment followed by thre

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Edwin Caballero-Espinal pleaded guilty to one count of illegally reentering the United States after having been deported following his conviction of a violent felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). In a hearing on February 11, 2005, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.) sentenced defendant to a term of 46 months’ imprisonment followed by thre

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Rungs County (Harkavy, J.), dated May 7, 2002, as denied that branch of their motion which was to vacate an inquest held on March 6, 2002, and (2) an order of the same court, dated July 12, 2002, as, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Ordered that

769 F.Supp. 116 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. Cornelio ESPINAL and Jose Antonio Dominguez, Defendants. No. 89 Cr. 763 (KTD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 18, 1991. *117 Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Anne W. Patterson, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for U.S. Bobbi C. Ster

PER CURIAM: Jose Antonio Cabrera Espinal (“Cabrera Espinal”) is the plaintiff in two related cases that have been consolidated on appeal. Addressing each temporally according to the date filed, we will refer to the cases as Espinal I and Espinal II. For the reasons stated below the district court’s decision in Espinal I is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and Espinal II is

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This unopposed motion by the Government to remand a criminal case for resen-tencing merits a brief opinion only to make clear the inappropriateness of the District Judge’s pretrial threat to impose the maximum sentence in the event the Judge concluded that the defendant went to trial without “a good defense.” Pedro José Cruz appeals from the Februar

Matter of Espinal-Melendez v Vasquez (2018 NY Slip Op 02617) Matter of Espinal-Melendez v Vasquez 2018 NY Slip Op 02617 Decided on April 18, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Rep

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-0986 Lower Tribunal No. 19-10141 ________________ American Towing of Miami, LLC, Appellant,

Case: 19-20427 Document: 00515530128 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 17, 2020 No. 19-20427

(2008) Ramon ESPINAL, Petitioner, v. Floyd BENNETT, Respondent. Civil Action Nos. CV-00-1337 (DGT)(RLM), CV-00-6536 (DGT)(RLM). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 5, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TRAGER, District Judge. Petitioner Ramon Espinal ("Ramon" or "petitioner")[1] is currently serving a sentence of 5