Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jose Antonio Malave”
Malave v. Holderpublic domain
610 F.3d 483 (2010) Manuela D. MALAVE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 08-3578. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 22, 2009. Decided June 29, 2010. *484 Paula S. Kim (argued), Katten Muchin Rosenman, Chicago, IL, for Petitio
Aveta Inc. v. Cavallieripublic domain
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In 2006, Aveta Inc. closed the acquisition of Preferred Medicare Choice Inc. (“PMC”), a Puerto Rico corporation. Ave-ta purchased PMC’s Class A shares from its controlling shareholders for 60.93% of the aggregate consideration, then merged a Puerto Rico acquisition subsidiary into PMC. PMC’s non-controlling Class B shares were converted into the right to receive the remain
Santiago-Lampón v. Real Legacy Assurance Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Reinaldo SantiagoLampón’s (“Santiago” or “plaintiff’) motion to strike Real Legacy Assurance Co.’s and The Shell Company Ltd. Puerto Rico’s (collectively “defendants”) experts’ reports as untimely. Docket No. 56. Co-defendant and third-party defendant Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportación de Puerto Rico
BOWNES, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of appellants’ convictions for conspiracy to commit and aiding and abetting the commission of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371 & 1341. The thirteen-count indictment detailed an arson for profit scheme involving the burning of Caribbean International, Inc., a wholesale dry goods business, locate
OPINION AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, United States District Judge Before the Court are two civil actions pertaining to a voluntary deferred compensation plan for eligible -University of Puerto Rico (“UPR”) employees. Voya Institutional Trust Company (“Voya”) .commenced an action against the UPR, Governor Alejandro Garcíar-Padilla (“García”),1
Bautista Cayman Asset Co. v. J.A.M.A. Dev. Corp.public domain
GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge Bautista Cayman Asset Company filed a complaint for collection of monies, execution of pledge, and foreclosure of mortgage against J.A.M.A. Development Corporation, Antonio Molina-Santos, Aida C. Machargo-Chardón, their conjugal partnership, the estate of Abraham Jiménez-Rivera, Nelly Rivera-Cano, the conjugal partnership Jiménez-Rivera, and Johanne Jiménez-Rivera, Marangely Jiménez-Riv
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the University of Puerto Rico (“UPR”), Governor Alejandro García-Padilla (“García”),1 and the President of the University of Puerto Rico Celeste Freytes’2 (“Freytes”) motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6). (Docket Nos. 14 and 15.) Additionally before
754 F.Supp.2d 351 (2010) Lilliam DAVILA-FELICIANO, Plaintiffs, v. PUERTO RICO STATE INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, et al. Defendants. Civil No. 09-1405 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 6, 2010. *354 Bamily Lopez-Ortiz, Lopez Toro, Law and Notary Offices, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Joanna B. Mato
West v. B.C.R.E.-90 West Street, LLCpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Robert R. Reed, J. This action concerns the question of whether the provisions of the Rent Stabilization Law governing high rent deregulation apply to apartments which are rent-stabilized as a result of the property owner’s receipt of tax benefits, pursuant to section 421-g of the Real Property Tax Law, and/or low interest mortgage loans, pursuant to the Private Housing Finance Law.
State v. Martinezpublic domain
896 A.2d 109 (2006) 95 Conn.App. 162 STATE of Connecticut v. Jose J. MARTINEZ. No. 26647. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 6, 2006. Decided May 2, 2006. *113 Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant s
Echevarria v. Robinson Helicopter Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Consolidated Plaintiffs in this matter, Lizzette M. Bouret Echevarria, Nicole Vidal Bouret, Catherine Vidal Bouret, and Camille Vidal Bouret (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this action seeking compensatory damages against the named defendants, Robinson Helicopter Company (“RHC”), Caribbean Aviation Maintenance Corporation (“CAM”), et al. (collectively “
Soto v. Barcelopublic domain
COFFIN, Chief Judge. On July 25, 1978, in what was to become one of the most controversial and well-pub*111licized events in recent Puerto Rico history, two suspected terrorists were killed in a shootout with police officers at a mountainous location known as Cerro Maravilla. Young members of a radical pro-independence group, the two were allegedly on their way to sab
350 F.3d 131 UNITED STATES of America, Appelleev.William Soto-Beniquez, Defendant, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Juan Soto-Ramirez, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Eduardo Alicea-Torres, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ramon Fernandez-Malavé, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carmelo Vega-Pacheco, Defendant,
United States v. Gonzales-Vasquezpublic domain
219 F.3d 37 (1st Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.WALDEMAR GONZALEZ-VAZQUEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.HECTOR HERNANDEZ-NEGRON, Defendant, Appellant. No. 98-2108, 98-2109 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Heard March 8, 2000.Decided July 18, 2000. APPEALS
356 F.3d 1 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.William SOTO-BENÍQUEZ, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Juan Soto-Ramírez, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Eduardo Alicea-Torres, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Ramon Fernández-Malavé, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Carmelo
In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel
United States v. Soto-Beniquezpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This massive drug conspiracy case from Puerto Rico involved a six-month trial and resulted in convictions of the eleven defendants who appeal, eight of whom received life sentences and three of whom received sentences of more than twenty years. The government charged this case as involving one overarching conspiracy from January 1990 t
In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M
United States v. Moralespublic domain
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. On July 25, 1978, Amaldo Dario Rosado and Carlos Soto Arrivi were shot and killed by police on a mountain site in Puerto Rico known as Cerro Maravilla. The two men, both of whom were members of the Puerto Rico independence movement (independen-tistas), had gone to Cerro Maravilla apparently intending to blow up or otherwise sabotage a television tower located on the mountain. The police reported
815 F.2d 725 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1063 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rafael MORENO MORALES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Angel PEREZ CASILLAS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jaime QUILES HERNANDEZ, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rafael TORRES MARRERO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STA