Cases

W. JONES, Justice. I. Nature op the Case A jury convicted Jorge Lopez-Orozco (“Defendant”) of three counts of first degree murder. The district court imposed three concurrent determinate life sentences. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction based on two alleged evidentiary errors committed by the

LOGUE, J.' Jose Ignacio Lopez, Sr., an incapacitated person, through his adult children and co-gu'ardians, filed the underlying lawsuit for the annulment of his marriage to Maria Mercedes Flores. In the trial court, Flores filed a motion to dismiss the annulment action and also moved for a protective order, which the trial court denied. Flores filed a petition for certiorari rev

GLEICHER, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the majority’s resolution of defendant’s great weight of the evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel challenges, but respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that defendant need not be separately sentenced for all convictions. In my view, MCL 777.21(2) compels the trial court to score the sentencing guidelines applicable to each

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered September 13, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the first degree. *1191Defendant allegedly subjected a 10-year-old girl to numerous sexual acts. He was charged in a multicount indictment and eventu

Lahtinen, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered September 13, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the first degree. *1191Defendant allegedly subjected a 10-year-old girl to numerous sexual acts. He was charged in a multicount indictment and eventu

ALTENBERND, Judge. Carlos Lopez, Manuel Pizaro-Maysonet, Carlos Colorado, and Jason Burgos appeal their judgments and sentences arising from their involvement in a heroin importation and distribution network that connected Puerto Rico and Florida. They were tried together. Although their ap *929 pea

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Jose A. Barreiro Lopez (“Barreiro”) and Doris I. Palacios Rivas (collectively “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action seeking compensatory damages against Universal Insurance Company (“Defendant”) under Article 1802 of the Puerto Rico Civil Code (“Article 1802”), P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 31, § 5141. (Docket No. 1.) Plaintiffs, both residente of Bilbao,

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Guillermo Mejia, Jorge Ortega and Ramon Lopez appeal drug convictions. We affirm. Jose Benitez, a confidential informant working under the supervision of Special Agent Paul Grimal, was placed on a boat going from Miami to Columbia, South America. Benitez was to gather intelligence on the Columbian drug trade and (if contacted

NUMBER 13-23-00499-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JORGE MICHAEL ABUNDEZ JR. A/K/A JORGE MICHAEL ABUNDEZ A/K/A JORGE ABUNDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM

OPINION OF THE COURT CONTI, Chief District Judge Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d), a district court may order a plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses an action and files a second action against the same defendant based upon a claim asserted in the first action to pay the “costs” incurred by the de

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JORGE REYNALDO LOPEZ No. 20-71956 HERNANDEZ, AKA Jorge Hernandez, AKA Jorge Hernandez Agency No. Lopez, A206-412-045 Petitioner, OPINION v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petitio

Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 2, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01153-CV JORGE FRANCISCO LOPEZ, M.D. AND COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, Appellants V. MAR

Order entered September 13, 2013 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01153-CV JORGE FRANCISCO LOPEZ, M.D. AND COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, Appellants V.

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2004, the order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. See Commonwealth v. Williams, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 *561(2003); Co

OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the coplaintiffs motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, Docket # 238, the codefendant’s opposition thereto, Docket # 245, and the coplaintiffs reply. Docket #260. After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, this motion is DENIED. Factual and Procedural Background D

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Lopez-Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pinedar-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007),

Judgment rendered March 9, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 54,265-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Plaintiff Juan Francisco Cintron-Arbolay (“Cintron” or “Plaintiff’) brought this action against the Puerto Rico Electrical Power Authority (“PREPA”), PREPA’s Executive Director, Eng. Miguel A. Cordero-Lopez (“Cordero”), and the Regional Administrator of Technical Operations for the Ponce Region of PREPA, Edgardo Rivera-Alvarado (“Ri

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Ruben Lopez-Lopez, Ramon Luciano-del-Rosario, and Carlos Santana were convicted of importation of, and possession with intent to distribute, approximately 700 kilograms of cocaine and for aiding and abetting these crimes. They were each sentenced to 235 months, or slightly less than 20 years, in prison. Lopez-Lopez, Luciano, and Santan

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Lopez-Vasquez and Julia Segura-Dominguez (collectively, “Petitioners”) seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. The IJ pretermitted Petitioners’ applications, concluding that they lacked any qualifying relatives for purposes of the hardship determination and rejec