Cases

Appeal from Chancery Court, Forrest County; Howard L. Patterson, Jr., Chancellor. Before SMITH, P. J., and ROY NOBLE LEE and BOWLING, JJ. AFFIRMED.

421 F.3d 663 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rey Gama MENDOZA, Appellant. No. 04-1386. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 16, 2004. Filed: August 30, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jordan S. Kushner, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Rafael Reta-Mendoza appeals his 41-month sentence for illegal reentry in the United States after deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326, arguing that, in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), his sentence was illegal because the district court enhanced his sentence beyond the constitutional maximum. Specifically, Reta-Mendo

ROMERO, Bankruptcy Judge. We address the appeals of Pedro Mendoza and Sandy Armijo and Steven and Darla Sue Dollman together as both appeals raise an identical legal issue: whether the New Mexico bankruptcy courts properly sustained a Chapter 7 trustee's objections to the amendment of the debtors' bankruptcy schedules. In both cases, the bankruptcy courts concluded the general right to amend schedules provided by

2025 UT App 46 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. ALEX CHRISTOPHER MENDOZA JR., Appellant. Opinion No. 20230471-CA Filed April 3, 2025 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Elizabeth A. Hruby-Mills

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. VINCENT MENDOZA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 18‑0512 FILED 11-21-2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. 2017-002264-001 DT The Honorable Annielaurie Van Wie, Judge

623 F.3d 1299 (2010) Luis Enrique MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-72865. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted October 5, 2010.[*] Filed October 27, 2010. *1300 John M. Pope, Stender and Pope, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for the petitioner.

STROUD, Judge. Defendant appeals his judgments for sexually related crimes committed against his stepchild. On or about 4 October 2017, defendant was convicted of indecent liberties with a child, incest with a child, and rape of a child. Defendant appealed and makes one substantive and one procedural argument. Because the trial court correctly allowed expert opinion testimony regarding the child's physical condition and accepted def

USCA11 Case: 22-10709 Document: 111-1 Date Filed: 04/08/2025 Page: 1 of 49 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10709 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 21-2322 & 21-3089 ______ IVIS ALEXANDER-MENDOZA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ____________ On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (A093-493-4

HULL, Circuit Judge: Marbel Mendoza, a Florida inmate, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, raising multiple challenges to his capital conviction for first degree felony-murder and death sentence. The district court denied Mendoza’s petition. This Court granted Mendoza a certificate of appealability (“COA”) as to one issue: “Whether defendant Marbel M

People v Gutti-Mendoza 2026 NY Slip Op 02131 April 8, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Kliford Gutti-Mendoza, appellant. Supreme Cour

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 20-CO-554 & 20-CO-608 GREGORY D. SHARPS AND LANDRELL L. JORDAN, JR., APPELLANTS,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANICEFARO GALEANA-MENDOZA,  Petitioner, No. 04-73100 v.  Agency No. A77-125-684 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an

NUMBER 13-18-00389-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. SERVANDO RIVERA AND MARIA MENDOZA, Appellees. On appeal from the 389th Distric

FILED RECEIVED IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI No. 13-14-.00705-CV 12/14/15 12/14/15 13th COURT OF APPEALS In The CLERK COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-SA-00378-COA JORDAN WALTERS APPELLANT v. BOARD ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER APPELLEE STANDARDS AND TRAINING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. VICKI B. DANIELS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUN

348 S.W.3d 401 (2011) In the GUARDIANSHIP OF the Person and Estate of Fannie G. JORDAN. Nos. 09-10-00240-CV, 09-11-00019-CV, 09-10-00543-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Decided July 28, 2011. Submitted on February 16, 2011. Submitted on June 16, 2011. *403 Trudie Jordan, Santa Fe, NM, pro se.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT JONATHAN GOODMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Yader Jose Mendoza’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). [ECF No. 39], Defendants failed to file a response in *1285opp

Rel: May 2, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals