Cases

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable William ■ C. Turnoff, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed on March 10, 2017. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Appellant LTCW Trust (“Trust”), successor to the Debtors in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding, appeals the District Court’s reversal of the Bankruptcy Court’s grant of summary judgment to the Trust. The Trust’s principal argument is that the District Court erred in ruling that the Bankruptcy Court could use its equitable power to avoid a contractual deadline

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Prostar Wireless Group, LLC ("Prostar") seeks to hold Domino's Pizza1 ("Domino's") accountable for the years of work it spent developing a custom GPS driver tracking system ("the Solution") for Domino's franchisees. Prostar argues that despite a lengthy collaboration, Domino's refused to honor its si

396 F.3d 922 In re WIRELESS TELEPHONE FEDERAL COST RECOVERY FEES LITIGATION.Joseph A. Blando, Individually and as Representatives of the Class of Customers of Nextel Retail Stores, Inc., Who Were and Are Being Charged a Fee for "Federal Programs Cost Recovery" (WDMO 02-921); James Sanders, Individually and as Representatives of the Class of Customers of Nextel Retail Stores, Inc., Who Were and Are Being Charged a Fee for "Federal-Programs Cost

607 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2009) Maureen BACKE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.; Peter V. Leparulo; George B. Weinert; Robert M. Hadley; Slim S. Souissi; and Catherine F. Ratcliffe, Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-01689-H (RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. April 1, 2009.

642 F.Supp.2d 1169 (2009) Maureen BACKE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.; Peter V. Leparulo; George B. Weinert; Robert M. Hadley; Slim S. Souissi; and Catherine F. Ratcliffe, Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-01689-H (RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. July 28, 2009.

MEMORANDUM OPINION* SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW1 LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The plaintiffs, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Deutsche Telekom AG (together, “T-Mobile”), moved for a preliminary injunction to stop the defendant, Aio Wireless LLC, from using a plum color as a central part of its

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1729 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION; SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. WIRELESS BUYBACKS HOLDINGS, LLC; WIRELESS BUYBACKS, LLC, Defendants – Appellants, and SIMPLE CELL INC.; VAUGHN

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 235 OPINION Appellees TracFone Wireless, Inc. and Virgin Mobile USA, LP (collectively, "the Prepaid Providers") sued the Commission on State Emergency Communications ("the Commission") for judicial review of the agency's final order concluding that the 9-1-1 emergency

Opinion ALDRICH, J. Plaintiff Saul DeLeon, on behalf of himself and other aggrieved employees, appeals from the judgment following the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant AirTouch Cellular doing business as Verizon Wireless, LLC (Verizon Wireless). DeLeon was a former retail sales representative for Verizon Wireless and filed a complaint seeking civil penalties under the Labor C

(2008) Charlene SMITH, Plaintiff v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1149 (JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 18, 2008. Order Denying Reconsideration November 10, 2008. RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE [Doc. Nos. 54, 68] JANET C. HALL, District Judge. P

445 F.Supp.2d 1116 (2006) Jeff QUON, Jerilyn Quon, April Florio, Doreen Klein, and Steve Trujillo, Plaintiffs, v. ARCH WIRELESS OPERATING COMPANY, INC.; City of Ontario; Ontario Police Department; Lloyd Scharf, and Debbie Glenn, Defendants. No. EDCV 03-199 SGL. United States District Court, C.D. California. August 15, 2006. *1117

Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. M. Strasner sued out-of-state defendants Brightpoint, Inc. (Brightpoint), Brightpoint North America, LP (BPNA), Touchstone Wireless Repair and Logistics, LP (Touchstone), and Touchstone Acquisition, LLC (TAL) (collectively, Defendants), for injuries she suffered when a Touchstone employee allegedly uploaded a private photograph of Stras

* On September 9, 2009, review dismissed and cause remanded to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 521 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY A

338 B.R. 609 (2006) In re CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 03-13711. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 6, 2006. *610 *611 Curtis A. Hehn, James E. O'Neill, Laura Davis Jones, Scotta Edelen McFarland, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, Jones & Wein, Sean T. Greec

(2008) Troy M. CORDELL, Jr., Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant. No. 05-CV-6703L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 5, 2008. DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. Plaintiff Troy Cordell ("Cordell") brings this action against his former employer, Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") alleging discrimination i

(2007) Nichole EHRHEART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1165. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 11, 2007. OPINION and ORDER OF COURT DONETTA W. AMBROSE, Chief Judge. In June of 2007, P

331 B.R. 568 (2005) In re CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 03-13711 (RB). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. June 24, 2005. *569 *570 Sean T. Greecher, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Curtis A. Hehn, Laura Davis Jones, Scotta Edelen McFarland, James E. O'Neill,

MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge. Before the Court are numerous motions filed by the party Defendants to the lawsuit, AT & T, Inc., AT & T Mobility, LLC, Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and Qualcomm Incorporated, brought by Plaintiffs, Corr Wireless Communications, LLC, Cellular South, Inc., and Cellular South Licenses, LLC, for violations of

OPINION ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. As an Indirect Channel National Retail Account Executive in Cingular Wireless’s Cleveland region, Anthony Rachells received numerous sales awards, consistently exceeded company sales goals by the greatest margin of any of his co-workers, and, in 2003, earned the top performance review among his Cingular peers. In