Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jones v. U.S. Bancorp”
Solutran, Inc. v. U.S. Bancorppublic domain
Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. (See Pl.'s Mot. for Summ. J. [Doc. No. 183]; Defs.' Mot. for Summ. J. [Doc. No. 170].) For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff's motion is granted, and Defendants' motion is denied. II. BACKGROUND
Miller v. U.S. Bancorppublic domain
926 F.Supp. 994 (1996) Carole MILLER, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANCORP et al., Defendants. Civil No. 95-18-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. May 16, 1996. *995 Benjamin Rosenthal, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey J. Druckman, Carole L. Souvenir, Sharon L. Toncray, Miller Nash Wiener Hager & Carlsen, Portland,
Sovereign Bancorp, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Acting Chairman. Before the entire Panel *: Common defendant the United States of America (the Government) has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of this litigation in the District of Massachusetts. This litigation currently consists of one action in that district and one action in the District of Minnesota. Respond
Almonor v. Bankatlantic Bancorp, Inc.public domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, filed January 22, 2009 (D.E. 49). Defendants filed a response in opposition on February 25, 2009 (D.E. 61), to which Plaintiff replied on March 11, 2009 (D.E. 67). The matter is now ripe for disposition. THE COURT has considered the Motio
142 B.R. 911 (1992) In re BONNER MALL PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. BONNER MALL PARTNERSHIP, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANCORP MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellee/Defendant. Nos. 92-0023-N-HLR, 92-0046-N-HLR. United States District Court, D. Idaho. July 15, 1992. As Corrected July 23, 1992. Barbara A. Buchanan, Elsaesser Jarzabek & Buchanan, Sandpoint, Ida
In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.public domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to decide whether the new value “exception” to the absolute priority rule survives the enactment of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (better known as the Bankruptcy Code), which replaced the Bankruptcy Act of 1898. 1 The new value exception allows the shareholders of a
Allen v. U.S. Bancorppublic domain
264 F.Supp.2d 945 (2003) Xavier ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANCORP, d.b.a. "U.S. Bank," Defendant. No. CIV. 02-1148-AS. United States District Court, D. Oregon. January 22, 2003. *947 Martin C. Dolan, Sue-Del McCulloch, Dolan Griggs & McCulloch, L.L.P., Portland, for plaintiff. Jeffrey J. Druckman, Janine C. Blatt, Druc
ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. 1. BACKGROUND In connection with a commercial equipment lease, Plaintiff U.S. Bancorp Equipment Finance, Inc. (now known as U.S. Bank National Association) (“U.S. Bank”) filed a complaint against Defendants Ideal Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. (“Ideal Inc.”), Ideal Manufacturing One, LLC (“Ideal LLC”), Christina Stimac (“Mrs. Stimac”) and Mark St
Zigrang v. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.public domain
123 P.3d 237 (2005) 2005 MT 282 329 Mont. 239 Nancy ZIGRANG, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY, INC., Piper Jaffray, Inc., Robert English and Thomas J. O'Neill, and John Does I through X, Defendants and Appellants. No. 04-455. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs April 20, 2005. Deci
Fraser v. United States Bancorppublic domain
168 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2001) Rebecca Ann FRASER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES BANCORP, a federally insured banking corporation; et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 00-543-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. September 28, 2001. Craig Alan Crispin, Crispin and Associates, Portland, OR, Attorney for Plaintiff. Jeffrey J. Druckman, Tamara E. Russell, Druckman &
Willems v. U. S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.public domain
107 P.3d 465 (2005) 2005 MT 37 326 Mont. 103 Harry WILLEMS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY, INC., Thomas J. O'Neill, Robert English, and John Does I through X, Defendants and Appellants. No. 04-454. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs November 30, 2004. Decided February 22, 2005.
PNC Bancorp, Inc. v. Commissionerpublic domain
PNC BANCORP, INC., SUCCESSOR TO FIRST NATIONAL PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, ET AL., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. PNC BANCORP, INC., SUCCESSOR TO FIRST NATIONAL PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, ET AL., 1 Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
First Savings Bank v. U.S. Bancorppublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, Senior District Judge. The case comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to review (Dk. 261) the magistrate judge’s order filed September 26, 1997, (Dk. 257), which granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint. The defendants also have pending a motion to supplement (Dk. 287) their motion to review the magistrate judge’s order. The following
State ex rel. Rogers v. Bancorp Bankpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Ex Rel. ) ) RUSSELL S. ROGERS, ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) ) v. ) C.A.
Republic Bancorp Co. v. Beardpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Lerch v. Citizens First Bancorp., Inc.public domain
805 F.Supp. 1142 (1992) V. Rachel LERCH, Plaintiff, v. CITIZENS FIRST BANCORP., INC., Defendant. Harriette ROTH, et al., Plaintiff, v. Richard G. KELLEY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-3538. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 11, 1992. *1143 *1144 Lester L. Lev
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. BFPRU I, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER John G. Koeltl, District Judge: This action arises out of a dispute between the plaintiffs, U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (collectively, the “Lender”); the defendants and third party plaintiffs, BFPRU I LLC, (the “Borrower”) and Mark Karasick and Michael Silberberg (the “Guarantors”); and the third party defendant, the Lender’s loan servicer, LNR Partners, LLC (
CHC Investments, LLC v. FirstSun Capital Bancorppublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHC INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0353-KSJM ) FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP, ) WILLIAM D. SANDERS, WILLIAM ) P. SANDERS, )
Lerch v. Citizens First Bancorp, Inc.public domain
OPINION HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court upon a motion by plaintiffs for Class Certification pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. In this action, plaintiffs allege that defendants engaged in securities fraud, violating federal and state laws, and causing damages to the plaintiffs. The class they seek to represent consists of: all persons or entitie
State of Delaware, ex rel. Rogers v. Bancorp Bankpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) Plaintiff, ex rel. ) ) RUSSELL S. ROGERS ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) ) C.A. No. N18C-09-240 v. ) PRW CCLD ) THE BANCORP BANK; ) INTERACTIVE C