Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jones v. Stern Buildings, LLC”
Trilogy Federal, LLC v. Civitasdx LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRILOGY FEDERAL, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-2713 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell CIVITASDX LLC, et al., Defendants. CIVITASDX LLC, et al., Plaintiffs,
Jones v. Mackey Pricepublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 25 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH GREGORY N. JONES, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MACKEY PRICE THOMPSON & OSTLER, MACKEY PRICE, LLC, RANDALL A. MACKEY, and GIFFORD W. PRICE,
Tolton v. Jones Daypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NILAB RAHYAR TOLTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-945 (RDM) JONES DAY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings. Dkt. 37. Plaintiffs Nilab Rahyar
Tobias Jones v. United States Secret Servicepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 22, 2024 Decided July 15, 2025 No. 23-5288 TOBIAS JONES, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the
REM OA Holdings, LLC v. Northern Gold Holdings, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE REM OA HOLDINGS, LLC and ) SIFT FIXED US002, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs and ) Counterclaim-Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0582-LWW ) NORTHERN GOLD HOLDINGS, ) LLC, ) ) Defendant and
Marquinn Jones-Nelson v. State of Alaskapublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA MARQUINN JONES-NELSON, ) ) Sup
*953OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: In this opinion, we address an important policy question concerning the proper scope of the record before this court and the extent to which this court may determine facts, if at all, when it considers a certified question from a federal court. The present matter arises in a pending certification
477 Harrison Ave, LLC v. JACE Boston, LLCpublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12600 477 HARRISON AVE., LLC vs. JACE BOSTON, LLC, & another.1 Suffolk. Ja
Jones v. LeFrance Leasing Ltd. Partnershippublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants LeFrance Leasing Limited Partnership and Mid State Management Corporation appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Schack, J.), dated June 3, 2013, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was, in effect, for leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of
Williams v. Green Power Ventures, LLCpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
James J. Tancredi, Unites States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION In 2004, the plaintiff, Lucille St. George ("Ms. St. George" or "Plaintiff"), and William *480Nappo ("Mr. Nappo") were divorced. Since then, the parties have been involved in interminable litigation in a variety of cases both here and in the Connecticut Superio
STROM TRUST v. SCS CARBON TRANSPORT, LLCpublic domain
#30317, #30338-r-JMK 2024 S.D. 48 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** #30317 BETTY JEAN STROM TRUST, RITA BROWN, and CRAIG AND LISA BASLER FAMILY TRUST, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SCS CARBON TRANSPORT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, a/k/a SUMMIT CARBON SOLUTIONS, Defend
Stuart's LLC v. Edelmanpublic domain
Stuart's LLC and WAYNE GALVIN, Plaintiffs, againstStuart Edelman, LEVEL 8 APPAREL, LLC, WORLD CROSS CULTURE, INC., WORLDWIDE SOURCING GROUP, LLC, SEUNG BON KIM a/k/a SCOTT KIM a/k/a SAM KIM, PETER LISTER, MICHAEL HONG and MARY-LEE EDELMAN, Defendants. 012560-09
Jones v. Bay Shore Union Free School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge Plaintiff Charles W. Jones (“Jones” or “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against defendant Bay Shore Union Free School District, (the “District”), Peter J. Dion (“Dion”), Evelyn Bloise Holman (“Holman”), and Robert Pashken (“Pashken”) (collectively “Individual Defendants”, and taken together with the District, “Defendants”), alleging violations of Plaintiffs co
867-871 Knickerbocker, LLC v. Polipublic domain
867-871 Knickerbocker, LLC, Appellant, againstMartha C. Poli, Respondent, Maria Clara Matias and Patricia Damon, Tenants, et al., Undertenants. Stern & Stern, Esqs. (David Lyle Stern and Pamela Smith of counsel), for appellant. Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation A, (Jack Underwood and Jessica A. Rose of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from an order of the Civil Cou
In re 9 Houston LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING THE DEBTOR’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO SELL APPROXIMATELY 3.378 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER INTERESTS Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this single asset real estate.ease, a dispute has arisen over wheth
CHC Investments, LLC v. FirstSun Capital Bancorppublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHC INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0353-KSJM ) FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP, ) WILLIAM D. SANDERS, WILLIAM ) P. SANDERS, )
Pamela Gillie v. Law Office of Eric A. Jonespublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. From the founding, the States have taken debts — whether owed by them or to them — seriously. Compare Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419, 1 L.Ed. 440 (1793), with U.S. Const. amend. XI. If States have the sovereign right to set the terms of being sued, see Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 715-27, 119 S.Ct. 2240, 144 L.Ed.2d 636 (1999), they assu
Elliott v. General Motors LLCpublic domain
CHIN, Circuit Judge: On June 1, 2009, General Motors Corporation (“Old GM”), the nation’s largest manufacturer of automobiles and the creator of such iconic American brands as Chevrolet and Cadillac, filed for bankruptcy. During the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008, as access to credit tightened and consumer spending diminished, Old GM posted net losses of $70 billion over the course of a year and a half. The U.S. Department
Opinion After Trial (1) Allowing Claims-, (2) Determining Nondischargeable Debt; And (3) Denying Injunctive Relief Phillip J. Shefferly, United States Bankruptcy Judge Introduction Nagel Precision Inc. (“Nagel”) designs and manufactures machines used in the automotive and other industries. Nagel brought this adversary proceeding against two Chapter 11 debtors, one of