Cases

J^LANDRIEU, Judge. Dorothy Mesa appeals from the district court’s summary judgment granted in favor of Delores Wares and her husband, Alphonse Spurlock. The trial court ruled that the plaintiff, Dorothy Mesa, is es-topped from enforcement of her claim for additional interest payments from the defendants, as the mortgage debt has been paid in full. We reverse the district court’s granting of the motion for summary judgment and

| iBYRNES, Judge. We grant writs in order to review the denial of relator, First Financial Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff-respondent, Cherlyn Washington, a patron in Horace’s bar, was shot twice when she was caught in the cross-fire between Horace Spurlock, the owner of the bar, and unknown robbers. Plaintiff sued Spur-lock, doing business as Horace’s Bar, and First Financia

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant, Danny Satterfield, a Deputy with the Sumner County Sheriffs Department (“S.C.S.D.”), appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss based on absolute or qualified immunity. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Robert Spurlock and Ronnie Marshall, alleged that Satterfield committed various acts that violated their constitutional and/or statutory rights. For the reas

SUMMERS, Judge, concurring. I agree with my colleagues that a new trial is warranted to remove any possible cloud of unfairness or error of prejudicial dimensions. I do believe that we can answer the questions posited by the appellant without the necessity of the accusations of criminal conduct on the part of the prosecutor. The effects of a charge of subornation of perjury are indelible. They last foreve

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT COLLEEN SPURLOCK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD85580 ) CITY OF COLUMBIA, MISSOURI, ) Opinion filed: April 18, 2023

[Cite as Spurlock v. Pemberton, 2013-Ohio-4002.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY GARY SPURLOCK and GLADYS : SPURLOCK, : Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Case No. 13CA1 Cross-Appellees, : vs.

[Cite as State v. Spurlock, 2013-Ohio-5369.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 13CA010354 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RUBIN E. SPURLOCK

904 S.W.2d 152 (1995) Edna Irene SPURLOCK, Appellant, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES, Appellee. No. 03-94-00268-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. June 7, 1995. Rehearing Overruled September 13, 1995. *154 Mary Kay Sicola, Austin, for appellant. Allison Benesch, Asst. Dist. A

[Cite as Robinson v. Spurlock, 2012-Ohio-1510.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY JAMES LEE ROBINSON, et al., : Plaintiffs- : Case No. 11CA4 Appellants/Cross-Appellees, : v.

The trial court judgment terminates the parent-child relationship between appellant and his son, based upon the provisions of Texas Family Code § 15.02(1)(B) (Supp. 1982). Appellees, the child's maternal grandparents, initiated the action and pleaded that subsection of the Code as the sole basis for termination. The child's natural mother, appellant's former wife, voluntarily relinquished her parental rights in the manner provided by § 15.03 of the Code. The provisions of § 15.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge. Before me is the motion of Plaintiff Dorothy Spurlock for an order pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) dismissing her complaint without prejudice. (Doc. No. 12). Spur-lock also asks that I apply the doctrine of prospective equitable tolling to toll the statute of limitations for one year following the entry of an order dismissing her case. Defendant

BARNES, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. This appeal proceeds from the Circuit Court of Lauderdale County, Mississippi and a judgment of conviction of capital murder and a mandatory sentence of life as a habitual offender without eligibility for parole against Carl Sherman Spur-lock. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. FACTS ¶ 2. The following facts are taken from testimony presented at tri

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The Commissioner of Social Security determined that Joyce Jones was ineligible for disability benefits, and the district court agreed. On appeal, Jones argues that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) improperly disregarded evidence from one of her treating physicians without re-contacting him to obtain further documentation. Because (1) the ALJ had

CARROLL, Chief Justice. The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (the “Department”), ap-pellee, sought termination of the parental rights of appellant Edna Spurlock. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 15.024 (West Supp.1995). 1 *

CARLEY, Presiding Justice. Scott Spurlock (Father) and Lois Spurlock (Mother) were divorced in 2005. Pursuant to the final divorce decree, Father was ordered to pay monthly child support of $1,063. Three years later, he initiated a review of that child support order by the Department of Human Resources (DHR) pursuant to OCGA § 19-11-12. DHR recommended that his child support obligation be reduced to $718 per month, and petit

Opinion filed January 18,2013 In The CleUcntl) Court of Appeals No. 11-ll-OOOlO-CR JOHN WILLIAM SPURLOCK, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 278th District Court Leon County, Texas

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1124 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1125 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

167 F.3d 995 Robert SPURLOCK and Ronnie Marshall, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Danny SATTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellant,Lawrence Ray Whitley; Jerry R. Kitchen; John D. Coarsey;Henry Apple; Sumner County, Tennessee; City ofHendersonville, Tennessee, Defendants. No. 97-6076. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued July 30, 1998.Decided Feb.

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Ingrid LAW, Plaintiff, v. Thomas G. SPURLOCK, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-AR-1217-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 8, 2008. Order Resolving Notice of Dismissal September 17, 2008. Order Amending Opinion October 7, 2008. Order Dismiss

330 F.Supp. 228 (1971) Paul SPURLOCK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-2157. United States District Court, D. Colorado. June 18, 1971. William H. Lewis, Philip M. Jones, Cole & Lewis, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff. D. Monte Pascoe, William Emig, Ireland, Stapleton, Pryor & Holmes, Denver, Colo., for defendant. <