Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jones v. Sherry W”
OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Sherry Jones appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants Union County, Tennessee (“Union County”) and Union County Sheriffs Department (“the Sheriffs Department”) pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). In granting summary judgment, the district court found that there was no genuine issue o
David E. Jones v. Dr. Alissa Sherry Alissa Sherry Consulting, PLLC And Legal Consensus, PLLCpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00279-CV David E. Jones, Appellant v. Dr. Alissa Sherry; Alissa Sherry Consulting, PLLC; Legal Consensus, PLLC, Appellees FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-17-006851, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OP
United States v. Jonespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge Defendant Joseph Jones moves pro se under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) for a reduction of his sentence for distributing crack cocaine claiming that the sentencing guidelines range upon which his sentence was based was later lowered and made retroactive to his case by Amendment 750 to
James Huaman v. Laura Sherrypublic domain
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 25, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00845-CV JAMES HUAMAN, Appellant V. LAURA RICHARDS SHERRY, Appellee On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppapublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1062 GEORGE HENGLE; SHERRY BLACKBURN; WILLIE ROSE; ELWOOD BUMBRAY; TIFFANI MYERS; STEVEN PIKE; SUE COLLINS; LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. SHERRY TREPPA, Chairpe
Jones v. Pramstallerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BADAWI ABDELLATIF’S MOTION FOR ORDER DISQUALIFYING PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WITNESS PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. Before the court is Defendant Badawi Abdellatifs motion to disqualify Plaintiffs expert, Dr. Jerry Walden, under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) and Rule 702 of the Federal Rules
Jones v. PRAMSTALLERpublic domain
678 F.Supp.2d 609 (2009) Yvette JONES, Plaintiff, v. George PRAMSTALLER, Director of Health Care Services, Nancy Martin, Coordinator of Health Care Services Risk Management,[1] Michael Wilkinson, Registered Nurse, Tamerla Hamilton, Registered Nurse, Renee A. VanHouten, Registered Nurse, David Van Arsdale, Registered Nurse, Sherri Castenholtz, Registered Nurse,[2] Correctional Medical Services, Inc., A Foreign Corporation, an
Creasman, Sherry v. Waves, Inc.public domain
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO SHERRY CREASMAN, ) Docket No. 2017-05-0843 Employee, ) v. ) WAVES, INC., ) State File No. 3990-2017 Employer, ) And
Creasman, Sherry v. Waves, Inc.public domain
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Sherry Creasman ) Docket No. 2017-05-0843 )
Smith, Sherry Lynnpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0298-09 SHERRY LYNN SMITH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS GRIMES COUNTY K EASLER, J., delivered the opinion of the Cou
Smith, Sherry Lynnpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0298
Jerry Sherry v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00126-CR Jerry Sherry, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 14,887, HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gordon v. Jonespublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 378 OPINION Appellant, Ronald X. Gordon, appeals pro se to challenge dismissal with prejudice of his claims against appellees, Mildred Jones and James Albro, in response to Albro's motion. Appellant's five points of error present the following two issues for review: (1) whether
Smith, Sherry Lynnpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0298-09 SHERRY LYNN SMITH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS GRIMES COUNTY K EASLER, J., delivered the opinion of the C
Smith, Sherry Lynnpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0298
Johnson v. Sherrypublic domain
586 F.3d 439 (2009) William JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeri Ann SHERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-1322. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 7, 2009. Decided and Filed: November 13, 2009. *440 ARGUED: Elizabeth L. Jacobs, Law Office, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Andr
Romeo v. Jonespublic domain
144 S.W.3d 324 (2004) Richard ROMEO and Darlene Romeo, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Robert E. JONES, et al., Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 83482. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. September 21, 2004. *327 Richard C. Witzel, David Anthony Dimmitt and Paul K. Travous, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiffs
Jones v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND CRAIG HUTCHINSON, M.D.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT BADAWIABDELLATIF’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. In October 2007, Ra
Brooks v. Sherry Lane National Bankpublic domain
OPINION Betty Brooks, intervenor, appeals a summary judgment in favor of appellee, Sherry Lane National Bank (Sherry Lane), and raises two points of error. Brooks contends that Sherry Lane's motion for summary judgment should have been denied and that her own motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Alternatively, Brooks contends that Sherry Lane's motion should not have been granted because her motion in opposition and accompanying affidavits raised a ma
Sherry Ann Weeks v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed November 21, 2013 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-11-00324-CR __________ SHERRY ANN WEEKS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 39th District Court Stonewall Co