Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ Nos. 21-3167, 21-3379 _______________ SANOFI AVENTIS U.S. LLC, Appellant in No. 21-3167 v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HU- MAN SERVICES; SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DE- PARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; GENERAL COUNSEL, UNITED ST

24-598 Mosaic Health, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: May 2, 2025 Decided: August 6, 2025 No. 24-598 MOSAI

No. 24-598 Mosaic Health, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: May 2, 2025 Decided: August 6, 2025 Amended: October 15, 2025

489 F.Supp.2d 759 (2007) Karen CLARK, Plaintiff v. SANOFI-SYNTHELABO, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:05CV-344-S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. March 15, 2007. *760 Samuel G. Hayward, Adams, Hayward & Welsh, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff. Clay M. Stevens, Leslie M. Cronen, Thompson Mil

747 F.Supp.2d 745 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Elaine BENNETT and Donald P. Boone, Plaintiffs, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. H-08-3408. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 30, 2010. *748 David W. Sanford, Sanford Wittels et al., Washington, DC, Mitchell R. Kreindler,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-2655 PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SANOFI-SYNTHELABO, S.A., SANOFI-SYNTHELABO, INCORPORATED, and STWB, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Purdue Research Foundation (“PRF”), an Indiana corporation with its principal place of business in West Lafayette, Indiana, filed this action for breach of contract in the Superior Court for Tippecanoe County, Indiana, against Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A. (“SSBO France”), a French corporation with its principal place of business in Paris, France.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00020-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/6/2025 4:37 PM No. 15-25-00020-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Judge. _JjWiley F. Jones and Carlene Jones, as Trustees of the Wiley F. Jones and Carlene Jones Living Trust, appeal from an order of the circuit court ordering them to pay appellee, Dottie Kerbow Bourassa, a judgment in the amount of $29,108.46. Appellants argue on appeal that the trial court erred by (1) finding that an implied agreement existed between the parties, (2) f

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 12, 2021 ************************* HAROLD JACKSON as administrator of * PUBLISHED the Estate of STEPHANIE JACKSON, * * No. 16-1194V Petitioner, * * Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey v.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND.. .32 A. Factual Background... 32 B. Procedural History.. .33 1. Initial Complaint and Pre-Trial Proceedings.. .33 2. Jury Verdict... 34 3. Post-Trial Motions... 34 C. Applicable Standards of Review.. .35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNSON & JOHNSON : HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS INC., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 24-3188 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.:

Opinion and Order BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..............................................................303 I. The Parties .............................................................304 A. Teva ................................................................304 B.

*912MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Crosscountry Mortgage, Inc. (“CCMI”)1 has moved to dismiss the conspiracy to breach fiduciary duties claim brought by Guaranteed Rate, Inc. (“GRI”).2 The basis for CCMI’s motion is lack of personal jurisdiction. In

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MANTI HOLDINGS, LLC, MALONE § MITCHELL, WINN INTERESTS, § LTD., EQUINOX I. A TX, GREG § No. 354, 2020 PIPKIN, CRAIG JOHNSTONE, TRI-C § AUTHENTIX, LTD., DAVID § Court Below – Court of Chancery MOXAM, LAL PEARCE, and JIM § of the State of Delaware RITTENBURG §

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Binyamin Pinkus sued Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (“SiriusXM”), alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Doc. 1. Siri-usXM answered and brought third-party indemnification claims against several companies that made telemarketing calls for it. Doc. 11. One of the third-party defendants, DialAmeric

252 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2001) IN RE: CYBERNETIC SERVICES, INC., D/B/A SILENT RADIO, INC., DEBTOR. PETITIONING CREDITORS; BYRON Z. MOLDO, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF CYBERNETIC SERVICES, INC., DBA SILENT RADIO, INC. ("MOLDO"), APPELLANTS, v. MATSCO, INC., APPELLEE. IN RE: CYBERNETIC SERVICES, INC., D/B/A SILENT RADIO, INC., DEBTOR.BYRON Z. MOLDO, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, APPELLANT,v.MATSCO, INC., AND MATSCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION, PETITI

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff uBID, Inc. is a Chicago-based company that auctions the excess inventory of manufacturers and retailers over the Internet. It brought suit in Illinois against The GoDaddy Group, Inc., which operates the well-known domain name registration site GoDaddy.com. In its complaint, uBID alleged that GoDaddy violated the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), by intentiona

ENTRY ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants, Robert G. Long (“Mr. Long”) and Mission Critical Commissioning LLC.’s (“MMC”) Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Filing No. 30) and Defendants, Hugh General Management, LLC.’s (“HughGM”) and HughCx, LLC.’s (“HughCx”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdi

673 F.Supp.2d 621 (2009) uBID, INC., Plaintiff, v. The GoDADDY GROUP, INC. and GoDaddy.com, Inc., Defendants. No. 09 C 2123. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 5, 2009. *624 Robert M. Foote, Foote, Meyers, Mielke & Flowers, LLC, Peter Lawrence Currie, The Law Firm of Peter L. Currie, P.C.,