Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jones v. PGA Tour, Inc.”
Morris Communications Corp. v. PGA Tour, Inc.public domain
DUBINA, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant, Morris Communications Corp. (“Morris”), brought suit against Defendant-Appellee PGA TOUR, Inc. (“PGA”), alleging that PGA violated section 2 of the Sherman Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 2, by monopolizing the markets for (1) the publication of compiled real-time golf scores on the Internet, and (2) the sale, or syndication of those sc
Morris Communications Corp. v. PGA Tour, Inc.public domain
235 F.Supp.2d 1269 (2002) MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiff, v. PGA TOUR, INC., Defendant. No. 3:00-CV-1128-J-S0TJC. United States District Court, M.D. Florida. Jacksonville Division. December 13, 2002. *1270 *1271 George D. Gabel, Jr., Timothy J. Conner, Holl
Morris Communications Corp. v. PGA Tour, Inc.public domain
117 F.Supp.2d 1322 (2000) MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiff, v. PGA TOUR, INC., Defendant. No. 3:00-CV-1128-J-20C. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. October 23, 2000. *1323 George D. Gabel, Jr., Timothy J. Conner, Jerome W. Hoffman, Holland & Knight LLP, Jacks
Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAMS MICHAEL HICKS; No. 16-15370 KENNETH HARMS, as Class Representative Plaintiffs and D.C. No. Individual Plaintiffs; MATTHEW 3:15-cv-00489-VC ACHATZ; BRANDON ANTUS; CHAD ANTUS; ANDREW BARNES; CHRIS BERRY; MICHAEL BESTOR; OPINION DUANE BOCK; DAVID BROOKER; MARK CARNES; STEVEN CATLIN; BRUCE CLENDENEN; GRAEME COURTS; MICHAEL DARBY; HENRY DIANA; DON DONATELLO; MICHAEL DOR
Barron v. PGA Tour, Inc.public domain
670 F.Supp.2d 674 (2009) Stephen Douglas BARRON, Plaintiff, v. PGA TOUR, INC., Defendant. No. 09-CV-02733 Ma/P. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. November 16, 2009. *676 Arthur E. Horne, III, Murray B. Wells, Horne & Wells, PLLC, Jeffrey S. Rosenblum, Marc E. Reisman, Rosenblum & Reisman, Amy
Martin v. PGA Tour, Inc.public domain
994 F.Supp. 1242 (1998) Casey MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. PGA TOUR, INC., a Maryland corporation, Defendant. No. 97-6309-TC. United States District Court, D. Oregon. February 19, 1998. *1243 Martha Lee Walters, Walters Romm & Chanti, Eugene, OR, William H. Wiswall, Wiswall & Walsh PC, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff. George J.
Robert Trent Jones II, Inc. v. GFSI, INC.public domain
(2008) ROBERT TRENT JONES II, INC., and Robert Trent Jones Licensing Group, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. GFSI, INC., d/b/a Gear for Sports, Inc., Defendant. No. 07-4913 SC. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 4, 2008. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INT
Jones v. Lanier Fed. Credit Unionpublic domain
RICHARD W. STORY, United States District Judge *1275This case comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [22], Defendant's Second Motion for Judicial Notice of Other Suits Filed by Plaintiff [23], Defendant's Third Motion for Judicial Notice of Other Suits Filed by Plaintiff [26], and Defendant's Motion to Strike Plain
Jones v. Piedmont Plus Fed. Credit Unionpublic domain
RICHARD W. STORY, United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint [16]. After reviewing the record, the Court enters the following Order. Background1 Plaintiff VaShaun Jones brought this action against Defendant Piedmont Plus
Qualcomm Inc. v. Compal Elecs., Inc.public domain
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm") against Defendants Compal Electronics, Inc. ("Compal"), FIH Mobile Ltd. and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (together "Foxconn"), Pegatron Corporation ("Pegatron"), and Wistron Corporation ("Wistron"), collectively "Defendants" or "Contract Manufacturers." Dkt. No. 35-1.
505 F.3d 818 (2007) C.B.C. DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P., Defendant-Appellant, The Major League Baseball Players Association, Intervenor-Appellant. National Football League Players Association, National Football League Players, Inc.; NBA Properties, Inc.; NHL Enterprises, L.P.: NFL Ventures, L.P.; National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.; PGA Tour, Inc.; WNB
Arnold Cunningham v. Sunice, Inc.public domain
08/29/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 9, 2019 Session ARNOLD CUNNINGHAM v. SUNICE, INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 16C2588 Kelvin D. Jones, Judge __________________________________
Martinez v. Cot'n Wash, Inc.public domain
Filed 8/1/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ, B314476 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV33139) v. COT’N WASH, INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior Cou
Cap Export, LLC v. Zinus, Inc.public domain
Case: 20-2087 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/05/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAP EXPORT, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee ABRAHAM AMOUYAL, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee 4MODA CORP., Third-Party Defendant v. ZINUS, INC., Defenda
Maeda v. Pinnacle Foods Inc.public domain
DISCUSSION Defendant seeks dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice on the following grounds: (1) the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the claims asserted by Plaintiff Iliana Sanchez; (2) Plaintiffs' consumer protection claims fail because Plaintiffs have not alleged an actionable misrepresentation; (3) Plaintiffs' common law claims fail as a matter of law; and (4) Plaintiffs lack standing to seek prospective injunctive reli
Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.public domain
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge Before the Court are the Motion to Compel Arbitration, Dkt. No. 59, Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 60, and Motion to Strike Portions of the Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 61, brought by Defendants Brookdale Senior Living Inc. and Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. ("Brookdale"). I. BA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00238-COA JANE RODRIGUEZ APPELLANT v. DIAMONDHEAD COUNTRY CLUB AND APPELLEE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/29/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RANDI PERESICH MUELLER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUN
Jones v. City of Monroepublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Jones v. City of Monroe, Michigan No. 01-2335 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0299P (6th Cir.) File Name: 03a0299p.06 ON BRIEF: J. Mark Finnegan, HEBERLE & FINNEGAN, Ann Arbor, Michigan, David F. Grenn, Monroe, Michigan,
R-BOC Representatives, Inc. v. Minemyerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ' A VERY BRIEF INTRODUCTION These patent infringement cases, involving seemingly uncomplicated plastic couplers, have now spanned ten years, generated 17 written opinions, scores of substantive orders, two trials, and a contempt hearing.1 The docket e
Helen Jones v. City of Monroe, Michiganpublic domain
*475GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BATCHELDER, J., joined. COLE, J. (pp. 481-491), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Helen Jones, who has multiple sclerosis, brought suit alleging that the municipal parking program of the City of Monroe, Michigan (