Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jones v. Equifax Information Services, LLC”
Mooneyham v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
*722 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREG N. STIVERS, District Judge. The United States Department of Education (“Department”) filed a motion to dismiss (DN 23) for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond; the matter is now ripe for adjudication. The
Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
615 F.3d 1217 (2010) Noemia CARVALHO, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated people, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; Transunion LLC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-15030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2010. Filed August 18, 2010.
Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
ORDER The opinion filed on August 18, 2010 [615 F.3d 1217], is amended as follows: At pages 12121-22 [615 F.3d at 1232] of the slip opinion, replace: < Until the consumer has successfully resolved the legal dispute in her favor— for example, by means of a judgment, arbitration award, or settlement — we cannot say that a CRA reporting factually correct information about the disputed debt is
Carvalho v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLCpublic domain
(2008) Noemia CARVALHO, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; and TransUnion LLC, Defendants. Case No. C 08-1317 JF (HRL). United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 2, 2008. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING MOTION
Byerson v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
467 F.Supp.2d 627 (2006) Cynthia BYERSON, Kristina M. Cardwell, and Paul, Curley, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Trans Union, LLC, and Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06cv582. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. December 20, 2006.
Smith v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
522 F.Supp.2d 822 (2007) Vilma SMITH f/k/a/ Vilma Escobedo, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and CSC Credit Services, Inc., and Trans Union, LLC a/k/a Trans Union Corporation, and Lease Finance Group Limited Partnership a/k/a Citifinancial USA, Inc. a/k/a CIT Group, Inc., a/k/a The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-227-DF. United States District Cour
Tilley v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
ORDER JAMES P. O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge. This case comes before the court on the motion of defendant CSC Credit Services, Inc. (“CSC”) to compel the plaintiff, Carol Beth Tilley, to produce her medical records, or in the alternative, strike plaintiffs damage claims arising from humiliation (doc. 137). Plaintiff has responded (doc. 140) and CSC has replied (doc. 141). For the reaso
Jordan v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
410 F.Supp.2d 1349 (2006) Theodore D. JORDAN, II, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 1:04-CV-1451. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 18, 2006. *1350 *1351 Lisa Dionne Wright, Law Office of Lisa D. Wright, Atlanta,
Valentine v. Equifax Information Services LLCpublic domain
(2008) Rebecca L. VALENTINE, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, a foreign corporation, Defendant. Civil No. 05-801-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. February 22, 2008. ORDER JONES, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action against defendant Equifax Information Services, alleging that defendant negligently an
Davis v. Equifax Information Services LLCpublic domain
346 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2004) Kijafa R. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, Defendant. No. CV 02-P-2924-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 15, 2004. *1167 Michael G. Graffeo, John D. Saxon PC, James D. Harper, James D. Harper PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Laura C
Riley v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.public domain
194 F.Supp.2d 1239 (2002) James Lamar RILEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00-835-BH-S. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. January 29, 2002. *1240 *1241 *1242 Richard D.
Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
629 F.3d 876 (2010) Noemia CARVALHO, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated people, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; TransUnion LLC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-15030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2010. Filed August 18, 2010.
Scott Hammer v. Equifax Information Svc LLCpublic domain
Case: 19-10199 Document: 00515558131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-10199 FILED Se
Sloane v. Equifax Information Services, LLCpublic domain
510 F.3d 495 (2007) Suzanne SLOANE, Plaintiff-Appellee, and John T. Sloane, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Trans Union, LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Incorporated; Citifinancial, Incorporated, Defendants. No. 06-2044. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: November 1, 2007. Decided: Dece
Ahmed Hammoud v. Equifax Information Servs.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0234p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ AHMED HAMMOUD, │ Plaintiff-Appellan
Williams v. Equifax Information Services LLCpublic domain
359 F.Supp.2d 1284 (2005) Angela P. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and American Recovery Systems, Inc., Defendants. No. 6:03CV1629-ORL-18KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 2, 2005. *1285 Steven Michael Fahlgren, Law Office of
Moore v. Equifax Information Services LLCpublic domain
333 F.Supp.2d 1360 (2004) Terry MOORE, Sr., Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, et al., Defendants. Civ.A. No. 1:03-CV-2378-MHS. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 23, 2004. *1361 *1362 Lisa Dionne Wright, Law Office of Lisa D. Wright, Atlanta, GA,
MEMORANDUM * We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and accept as true plaintiffs’ factual allegations. Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir.2007). Dismissal is proper where plaintiffs “lack ... a cognizable legal theory” or fail to allege “sufficient facts ... under a cognizable legal theory.” Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t,
405 F.Supp.2d 1141 (2005) STANDFACTS CREDIT SERVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. SA CV04-0358 DOC PJW. United States District Court, C.D. California. December 7, 2005. *1142 *1143 Cyrus Mehri, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC, Washington,
Jones v. CSC CREDIT SERVICES, INC.public domain
(2008) Melinda JONES v. CSC CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Civil Action No. 07-CV-1415. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division. July 7, 2008. MEMORANDUM ORDER MARK L. HORNSBY, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and for Entry of a Protective Order (Doc. 75). The motion is granted in pa