Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “Jones v. Doerge”
Doerge v. Wabash Railroadpublic domain
4 Ill. App.3d 914 (1972) 282 N.E.2d 226 HAROLD DOERGE, Plaintiff, v. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee. (Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, Third Party Defendant-Appellant.) No. 70-92. Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District. March 23, 1972. Rehearing denied May 5, 1972.
Doerge v. Heimenzpublic domain
■Hayden, J., delivered the opinion of the court. This case has been here before, and is reported 1 Mo. App. 238. Upon the new trial there was an agreed statement of facts, and from this it appears that the plaintiff lent to the intestate, Horst, and his partner, Brusselbach, sums of money at different times, the last item being of date January 5, 1867 ; that the partners hired' the plaintiff, and that he
Vaughn v. Bartonpublic domain
933 N.E.2d 355 (2010) Debbie J. VAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Jarrod BARTON and West Frankfort Recreation Association, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants. No. 5-09-0213. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. July 8, 2010. *356 William A. Alexander, Sam C. Mitchell & Associates, West Frankfor
Cain v. Finniepublic domain
785 N.E.2d 1039 (2003) 337 Ill. App.3d 318 271 Ill.Dec. 845 Rae CAIN, Sue Jones, Grattena Ponce, and Erma Farley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Barbara FINNIE, as Executor of the Estate of Blanche Spurlock, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-02-0150. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. February 21, 2003.
Stephens v. Allstate Insurance Co.public domain
PRICE, Judge. This tort action arises out of a collision between a left turning vehicle and a following automobile engaged in a passing maneuver on Highway 171 south of Stonewall in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana, on April 10, 1971, at about 9:50 a. m. Mrs. Carolyn Jane Stephens was driving a 1964 Ford south on U. S. Highway 171 and was in the lead position of a line of vehicles proceeding at a speed of approxima
Smith v. Longpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Stanley Paul Smith submitted a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The district court1 denied Smith IFP status, he paid the filing fee, and the complaint was filed and is currently pending in the district court. We therefore dismiss this appeal as premature. See 8th Cir. R. *702
Vaughn v. Bartonpublic domain
NO. 5-09-0213 N O T IC E Decision filed 07/08/10. The text of IN THE this dec ision m ay b e changed or corrected prior to the filing of a APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS P e t i ti o n for Re hea ring or the disposition of the same. FIFTH DISTRICT
United States (IRS) v. Gatespublic domain
80 F.Supp.2d 682 (1999) UNITED STATES (IRS), Plaintiff, v. Dennis C. & Bernice M. GATES, Defendants. Civil Action No. H-98-0341. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. July 1, 1999. Manuel P. Lena, Jr., Dept. of Justice, Tax Division, Dallas, TX, for United States (IRS), plaintiff. Teresa Jean Womack, Redding and Associates, Houston,
Certain Underwriters v. Argonaut Insur Copublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-3395 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON, Petitioners-Appellees, v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Cour
500 F.3d 571 (2007) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, Petitioners-Appellees, v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant. No. 06-3395. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 19, 2007. Decided August 29, 2007. Hugh S. Balsam (argued), Robert A. Badgley, Lord Bissell & Brook, Chicago, IL, for Petitioners-Appe
Lockhart v. Statepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 897 The appellant, Lisa Gail Lockhart, was convicted by a jury for trafficking in methamphetamine, a violation of §13A-12-231(11)(a), Code of Alabama 1975, as charged in the indictment. The trial court sentenced the appellant to three years' imprisonment. The ev
Keaton v. Branchpublic domain
The plaintiffs in error were the defendants below, and the defendants in error were the plaintiffs. They will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendants as they appeared in the trial court. The plaintiffs commenced this action in the district court of Stephens county, on December 2, 1921. They seek judgment in the sum of $650, with interest at six per cent. per annum from October 26, 1921, and foreclosure of mechanics' and materialmen's lien upon certain property described in t
Crum v. Gulf Oil Corp.public domain
70 Ill. App.3d 897 (1979) 388 N.E.2d 1008 FOUNTAIN CRUM, Plaintiff, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. (CURRY AND MARCHMAN WELL SERVICING COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.) No. 77-520. Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District. Opinion filed April 3, 1979. *898 Karl Dexheimer, of Pope a
Turner v. United States (In Re Turner)public domain
195 B.R. 476 (1996) In re Jimmy R. TURNER, Debtor. Jimmy R. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. Bankruptcy Case No. 94-02405-BGC-7. Adv. No. 94-00198. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 2, 1996. *477 *478
Bannister v. Armontroutpublic domain
807 F.Supp. 516 (1991) Alan J. BANNISTER, Petitioner, v. Bill ARMONTROUT, et al., Respondents. No. 87-0637-CV-W-9. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. August 23, 1991. Order Denying Motion to Alter, Amend or Reconsider April 30, 1992. *517 *518
Commonwealth v. Aguiarpublic domain
370 Mass. 490 (1976) 350 N.E.2d 436 COMMONWEALTH vs. GEORGE AGUIAR. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. March 1, 1976. June 14, 1976. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, & WILKINS, JJ. *491 Daniel F. Featherston, Jr., for the defendant. John D. Sh
Moffatt v. Hendersonpublic domain
By the Court.—Horace Russell, J. The only question raised by this appeal is, whether the payment by the defendant of the $88—the only sum due the plaintiff, as found by the learned judge below—after suit brought and before the answer was served, relieved the defendant from the payment of the costs of the action. There can be no doubt, that a defendant may plead anything occurring before answer, amounting to a d
Baldwin v. Spear Bros.public domain
Powers, J. This is a bill in chancery brought by the receiver of the Hygiene Milk Company to test the validity of a mechanic’s lien asserted by the defendant Spear Bros, on certain premises formerly owned by the Milk Company in the city of Burlington. On or about September 15, 1901, Spear Bros., who were contracters and builders, entered into a written contract with the Milk Company, a corporation, to furnish the materials and erec