Cases

FILED Juwzszmz Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the Distr|ct of Columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT ()F COLUMBIA BEVERLY J 0 JONES, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,§ Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. The plaintiff currently

PER CURIAM: Terrence Jacks appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administration Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, pursuant to *81642 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), respectively. On appeal, Jacks argues that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s determination regardin

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 18) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION®] TO SAID JUDICIAL. FILING (DOC. #19) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF. AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE . DEFEN

DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) REVERSING THE ALJ’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING AS UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE; (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Donnell Mitchell appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his application for supplemental security income (SSI) and the Appeals Council’s decision denying his request for review. On appeal, Mitchell contends substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s credibility determination and that the Appeals Coun

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Therman Jones appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Jones a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two questions about Rachel Parks’s application for supplemental security income on behalf of her minor son, D.P.: (1) whether the administrative law judge’s denial of Parks’s application was supported by substantial evidence; and (2) whether the Social Security Appeals Council must make explicit findings of fact about new evidence

625 F.3d 798 (2010) Sade N. THOMAS, a/k/a Sade N. Keyton v. COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Sade N. Thomas, Appellant. No. 08-4593. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 20, 2010. Filed: November 18, 2010. Randi S. Mandelbaum, Esquire (Argued), Jon C. Dubin, Esquire, Rutgers School of Law-Newark Child Ad

MEMORANDUM DECISION FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Pro se plaintiff Denise M. Hairston (“Hairston”) brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §.405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying the application of her minor daughter, S.N.

OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge. Claimant Connie Jerry seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) because claimant is not disabled under the Social Security Act. This court has jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to

61 F.Supp.2d 1141 (1999) Delila RANDALL, Widow and Representative of James W. Randall, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. CIV. 98-6172-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. August 17, 1999. *1142 Ralph Wilborn, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff. William W. Youngman, Assistant Un

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN TONEY, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:21-cv-00557-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kevin Toney moves to reverse a decision by Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Merrill E. Jones, : : Plaintiff, : v. : Civil Action No. 16-2290 (CKK) : : Social Security Administration, : : Defendant.

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Belinda Smith (Smith) appeals the district court’s order ■ upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (Commissioner) denial of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand to the Commissioner for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND

92 F.Supp.2d 1084 (2000) Edwina G. IBARRA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. CIV 99-6149-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. April 3, 2000. *1085 Ralph Wilborn, Ralph Wilborn & Etta L. Wilborn, Tucson, AZ, Tim D. Wilborn, Portland, OR, for plaintiff. William W. Yo

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Debra Vester applied for supplemental social security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act on September 14, 1992, claiming that she was unable to work due to her physical and mental impairments. After an initial denial, a hearing *888was held in 1993, and an adverse decision issued in 1995. In 1996, the Appeals Council of the Soci

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: I. Valinda S. Kornhauser brought this lawsuit to challenge the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for disability benefits. The District Court referred the case to a Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation (“R&R”) on the merits of Kornhauser’s challenge. On receiving the referral, the M

57 F.Supp.2d 1077 (1999) Joyce VICK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. CIV. 98-1196-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. July 2, 1999. *1078 *1079 *1080 David B. Lowry, Tim D. Wilborn, Tim Wilborn, Port

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Rosalie Grissom (Grissom) appeals the district court’s decision upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (Commissioner) denial of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. We reverse and remand with instructions for the district court to remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. I. BACKG

*815 OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge. Claimant Julie K. Layna seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration1 denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act (SSA).</