Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jones v. Caldwell”
Jones v. Caldwellpublic domain
By Judge John E. Wetsel, Jr. This case came before the Court on the Motion for interpleader of the Defendants Caldwell and Voorhees, to which the plaintiff consented, but which was opposed by the Receiver of the Doctors Insurance Reciprocal. The parties earlier appeared before the Court and, at the Court’s direction, have filed briefs, which the Court has considered. The Court has decided to grant the Motion for Interpleader
Jones v. Caldwellpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Kena Jones appeals from the trial court’s judgment that awarded Anthony Caldwell primary physical custody, Jones temporary physical custody and visitation rights, and Caldwell and Jones joint legal custody of two minor children.1 The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no prece-denti
Jones v. Caldwellpublic domain
KENNEDY, Justice. This mandamus proceeding stems from a lawsuit involving a dispute over a stock purchase agreement between the plaintiff/petitioner, Bruce M. Jones, and the defendant/respondent Charles S. Caldwell III. Jones seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the Jefferson County Circuit Court to set aside its order directing arbitration as to some of Jones’s claims. We grant the writ. Caldwell is the major
Caldwell v. Jonespublic domain
513 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2007) Wilbert CALDWELL, Plaintiff, v. Joseph L. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Gary Community School Corporation and personally, Dr. Mary Steele, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Gary Community School Corporation and personally, and Dock McDowell, Jr., in his official capacity as one of the legal counsel of the Gary Community School Corporation and personally, Defendants
Jones v. Caldwellpublic domain
230 Ga. 775 (1973) 199 S.E.2d 248 JONES v. CALDWELL. 28010. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted June 15, 1973. Decided July 2, 1973. Jesse Leon Jones, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Courtney Wilder Stanton, David L. G. King, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. NICHOLS, Just
Jones v. Caldwellpublic domain
Mobley, Chief Justice. Robert Orville Jones brought his petition for habeas corpus, alleging that he was illegally restrained because his probated sentences had expired before his probation was revoked. He appeals from the judgment remanding him to the custody of the warden. A motion to dismiss has been filed by the Attorney General on the ground that the appellant’s sentences have expired, and he is no longer
NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of the foreclosure of a home-equity conversion mortgage-commonly called a "reverse mortgage." We are asked to interpret a federal statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-20, which authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to establish a mortgage-insurance program designed to encourage lenders to offer reverse mortgages and
Caldwell v. Statepublic domain
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge Appellant David Caldwell appeals from an order of the Crawford County Circuit Court revoking his suspended imposition of sentence (SIS) and sentencing him to two years in the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC). On appeal, he argues that (1) the State's failure to call the victim as a witness at his revocation hearing violated his right to confront his accuser under the Confrontation Clause, and (2) t
Case: 17-14677 Date Filed: 09/05/2018 Page: 1 of 11 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-14677 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cv-03105-TWT THE ESTATE OF CALDWELL JONES, JR., EXEC
Caldwell v. Statepublic domain
Phillip T. Whiteaker, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority that there was insufficient evidence to revoke appellant *545David Caldwell's suspended imposition of sentence (SIS) based on a finding that he committed the offense of second-degree battery on a law-enforcement o
State v. Caldwellpublic domain
ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-003698-13 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
Caldwell v. COMETTOpublic domain
253 P.3d 708 (2011) David L. CALDWELL and Kathy C. Caldwell, husband and wife; Lawrence L. Seiler and Theresa L. Seiler, husband and wife; and Patricia St. Angelo, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Respondents, v. Thomas W. COMETTO and Lori M. Cometto, husband and wife; and Does 1-5, Defendants-Respondents-Cross Appellants. No. 37157. Supreme Court of Idaho, Lewiston, April 2011 Term.
Martinez v. Caldwellpublic domain
644 F.3d 238 (2011) Clint MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. James D. CALDWELL, Attorney General of the State of Louisiana; Brent Allain, Sheriff of Iberville Parish, Louisiana, Respondents-Appellants. No. 10-30318. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 15, 2011. *240 Ford Charles Marionneaux (argued), Elizabeth M. M
Caldwell v. Anpac Insurance Co.public domain
BROWN, Chief Judge. | plaintiff, Rodney Caldwell, sued defendants, ANPAC, Insurance Company and Michael Jones, to recover property and personal damages he sustained on March 13, 2011, when a rotten tree in Jones’s front yard fell and struck Caldwell’s truck as he, was driving down the street. Caldwell’s vehicle was totaled and he sustained neck and back injuries., - After a bench trial, the court rendered ju
United States v. Caldwellpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant John Caldwell appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Scullin, J.) dated January 19, 2012. In that order, the district court refused to reduce Caldwell’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to a term of imprisonment that fell below his amended guideline range. We affirm for the reasons set forth in United States v. Clifton Stith,
Caldwell v. Warrenpublic domain
2 So.3d 751 (2009) David J. CALDWELL, D.M.D., Appellant, v. Glen C. WARREN, Sr., M.D., and Mississippi Neurosurgery and Spine Center, PLLC, Appellees. No. 2008-CA-00173-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. February 10, 2009. *752 Christopher Hederi Neyland, Madison, attorney for appellant. Anastasia G. Jones and James A.
Jones v. Caldwellpublic domain
Did enactment of 24 of the Uniform Sales Act change the common-law rule in Arkansas that an infant may disaffirm a contract of sale of personal property and recover the property from a third party who was an innocent purchaser for value without notice from the infant's transferee? We hold that 24 of Act 428 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1941 (Ark. Stats., 1947, 68-1424) did change the common-law rule and that is determinative of this appeal. On October 28, 1948, Renaford Caldw
Mathes v. Caldwell Countypublic domain
273 S.W.3d 61 (2008) Bobbie A. MATHES, as Trustee, of the Bobbie A. Mathes Trust, Mary Lake, Individually and as Attorney in Fact for Elizabeth E. Jones, Ben J. Farley and Voncille W. Farley, Respondents, v. CALDWELL COUNTY, Missouri and Kingston, Missouri, Appellants. No. WD 68539. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 21, 2008. Ivan L. Schraeder, St
Brown v. City of Caldwellpublic domain
769 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2011) Douglas A. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CALDWELL, a subdivision of the state of Idaho, Mark Wendelsdorf, Garret Nancolas, Monica Jones, and John/Jane Does I through X, whose true identities are presently unknown, Defendants. Case No. 1:10-CV-536-BLW. United States District Court, D. Idaho. February 14, 2011. *1
Jonathan Robicheaux v. James Caldwell, et apublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs are seven same-sex couples and an organization whose membership includes same-sex couples and their families. The couples seek to marry in Louisiana or to have their marriage in another state recognized in Louisiana. They sued the state defendants for declaratory and injunctive relief, asking the district court to declare unconstitut