Cases

663 N.W.2d 868 (2003) CITY OF IOWA CITY, A Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. STATE BUILDING CODE BOARD OF REVIEW and Scott Kading, Appellees. No. 02-0461. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 11, 2003. *869 Susan Dulek, Assistant City Attorney, Iowa City, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Jeanie Kunkle Vaudt

MEMORANDUM OPINION HANSEN, Presiding Judge: Appellants seek review of a trial court order sustaining Motions for Summary Judgment filed separately by Appellees. Appellants contend summary judgment was improper because a material question of fact existed which should have been presented to a jury. We agree and REVERSE. The relevant facts, as agreed and reflected in the evidentiary mater

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. _JjThe defendants, Deloyd “Puggy” Jones (“Jones”) and Alton “Peewee” Augustin (“Augustin”), were each charged and convicted of two counts of attempted second degree murder and were each sentenced to forty years at hard labor, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, on each count, with the sentences to be served consecutively as to each defendant. For the reasons that follow

MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge. |,Brian L. Jones appeals his conviction and sentence for failing to comply with the sex offender registration requirements as set forth in La. R.S. 15:542.1.4. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the conviction and sentence. *1063 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Mr. Jones, who had been previo

CUTRER, Judge. The issue presented by this appeal is the constitutionality of LSA-C.C. art. 204 which provides as follows: “Such acknowledgment shall not be made in favor of children whose parents were incapable of contracting marriage at the time of conception; however, such acknowledgment may be made if the parents should contract a legal marriage with each other.”

696 F.Supp.2d 618 (2010) Edward R. JONES, Plaintiff, v. C.A. PRICE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, TYGART VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant. Civil No. 1:07cv57. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. March 17, 2010. *619 Edward R. Jones, Huttonsville, WV, pro se. *620 Chad M. Cardinal,

610 S.E.2d 133 (2005) 271 Ga. App. 487 NEELY v. JONES. No. A04A1801. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 3, 2005. *134 Waymon Sims, Atlanta, for Appellant. FitzGerald & Schultz, John K. FitzGerald, Harper, Waldon & Craig, John B. Craig, Atlanta, for appellee. MIKELL, Judge. Q

769 So.2d 28 (2000) STATE of Louisiana v. Troy J. JONES. No. 99-KA-0861. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. June 21, 2000. *32 Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, Nicole Barron, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, Louisiana, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee. J. Wilson Rambo, Louisiana Appellate Project, Mon

TONJA JONES * NO. 2020-CA-0582 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL MARIA CISNEROS, * DELGADO COMMUNITY FOURTH CIRCUIT COLLEGE, AND LOUISIANA * COMMUNITY AND STATE OF LOUISIANA TECHNICAL COLLEGE ******* SYSTEM APPEAL FROM

GUIDRY, Judge. The defendant, State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety, appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff a restoration of his suspended driving privileges. We reverse. Plaintiff’s action is based on LSA-R.S. 32:415.1A(1), which reads in pertinent part as follows: “§ 415.1 Economic hardship appeal of driver’s license suspension

HUNT, Circuit Judge. Under oral chartér Crowley Launch & Tugboat Company furnished to the appellee Shipping Board Corporation a large, flat-framed lighter, Crowley No. 76, for discharging 400 tons of sand ballast from the bark Monongahela in San Francisco Bay. The lighter was made fast to the bark by the employes of the appellant. About the time the barge was fully loaded, she capsized and was lost, and the contention of the a

504 So.2d 575 (1987) Beverly JONES, et al. v. Ronald GILLEN, et al. No. 86-CA-524. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. February 9, 1987. Rehearing Denied April 16, 1987. Writ Denied June 19, 1987. *576 Donelon & Donelon, Clement P. Donelon, Metairie, for plaintiffs-appellants.

316 So.2d 100 (1975) STATE of Louisiana v. Sammy H. JONES. No. 56140. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 25, 1975. Rehearing Denied July 25, 1975. Ernest E. Hartenstine, Asst. Public Defender, for defendant-relator. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles W. Borde, Jr., Durbin, Durbin, Borde & Fogg, De

This was an action by defendant in error against plaintiff in error for conversion of certain property located in the town of Johnson, Ind. T. Defendant in error, J.D. De Bord, had purchased certain machinery from plaintiff in error, the Continental Gin Company, and executed a chattel mortgage thereon, and had also executed a chattel mortgage upon buildings and machinery to the Laidlaw Lumber Company, and the Laidlaw Lumber Company had brought suit in the United States Court at Pauls Valley t

This action was brought by J. D. De Bord, as plaintiff below, against the Continental Gin Company, as defendant below, to recover damages for the wrongful conversion of certain buildings and machinery comprising a cotton gin, located in the town of Johnson. The action arose in the *Page 68 Indian Territory, and was transferred to the district court after statehood. The plaintiff, as security for indebtedness to the Laidlaw Lumber Company, had executed a m

Rolla DeBord, a brakeman on one of the trains belonging to the Chicago, Rock Island Gulf Railway Company, sued that company and recovered damages for injuries received by him while attempting to switch a car of coal up a steep incline to a coal chute at McLean, Texas. The negligence relied on was, first, that the coal bins were too close to the track; and, second, that the engineer *Page 304 of the train failed to stop after receiving a signal from the p

Herbert G. Wettlin and Elizabeth Wettlin, plaintiffs below and respondents here, recovered judgment for $3357.16 in the district court of Fremont County against Squier Jones and E.E. Vollmer, defendants below and appellants here, as damages for fraudulently depriving plaintiffs of their interest in certain personal property. The evidence on the part of plaintiffs and respondents tends to show: On August 24, 1921, respondents were the owners of certain laundry equipment in the town of Riverton

EIELD, P., delivered the opinion of the court. Stephen R. Neale and John H. Bennett, on the 12th day of January, 1833, entered into articles of partnership, to carry on the mercantile business in the town of Danville, Virginia, under the name of 1 ‘Neale & Bennett,” and in the county of Guilford, North Carolina, under the firm of “Bennett & Neale.” Neale to conduct the business at Danville, and Bennet

Saffold, J. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the defendants in error, against the pre~. sent plaintiffs, William Jones, Benjamin Horner, Edward Sims, David Scott, John Jones, Larkin Hammond and John W. Donaldson, owners and propric-*143tors of the steam boat Warrior, and co-partners in the freight of said boat, to recover damages for the loss of sixty-nine bales

Per Curiam. In light of Appellee's confession of error, we reverse the award of attorney's fees *1293and costs contained in the Amended Final Judgment of Foreclosure and remand for further proceedings. In light of the foregoing, Appellee's motion for extension of time to file the answer brief is denied as moot.