Cases

BY THE COURT: Before us is the motion of Defendant-Appellee Eagle Global Logistics (“Eagle”) to impose sanctions on Plaintiffs-Appellants, their counsel (principally, the “Provost Umphrey” law firm 1 ), or both. Eagle invites us to rely on Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, as well as 28 U.S.C. § 1927

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. *49 This appeal is from the rejection of a claim of unconstitutional deliberate indifference by a corrections officer to the health and safety of an inmate, Jonathan Leite. Leite v. Goulet , No. 15-CV-280-PB,

314 F.3d 193 Augustine DUBE; Noelle Davis; Kshanti Morris; Ruben Capaletti; Robin McVeigh; Melvin Evans; Cheryl Meachum-Evans; Bernard Greaux, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Provost Umphrey Law Firm LLP, Appellant,v.EAGLE GLOBAL LOGISTICS, also known as Eagle USA Airfreight Inc., Defendant-Appellee, andEqual Employment Opportunity Commission, Appellee.Augustine Dube; Noelle Davis; Kshanti Morris; Ruben Capaletti; Robin McVeigh; Melvin Ev

PARKER, Circuit Judge: Appellants Christine Kracunas and Darleen E. Pallett appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Charles L. Brieant, Judge) granting summary judgment in favor of Iona College and Professor Michael Palma. This appeal requires us to determine the circumstances under which a college may be liable under T

265 F.Supp.2d 525 (2003) In re LAUGHLIN PRODUCTS, INC., Patent Litigation. No. MDL 1498. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 29, 2003. *526 David Lewis Balser, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Atlanta, GA, for Hollywood Trans, Inc., Eric Bell. Joshua S. Bish, Gene A. Tabachnick, Reed Smith, Pittsburgh, PA, Kevin R. C

663 N.W.2d 657 (2003) 2003 ND 96 Jenese A. PETERS-RIEMERS, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Roland C. RIEMERS, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020225. Supreme Court of North Dakota. June 17, 2003. *658 Michael L. Gjesdahl, Gjesdahl & Associates, Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee.

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiffs, Robert Graham and Michael .Shane, move to amend their complaint in this action to eliminate the first count, renumber the second count .and change the relief requested in that count, and add a new count asserting a new claim. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint (“Motion”) (Docket

SUMMARY ORDER On October 12, 2005, pro se plaintiff David Jacobs, a former tenured schoolteacher, filed suit against his past employer school district, the corresponding Board of Education, the State of New York, state agencies, and various individuals under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of constitutional rights relating to his employment, as well as under state law for corresponding torts. We assume the parties’ familiarit

246 P.3d 938 (2010) ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP, an Arizona limited partnership, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joann CALLAWAY and Joseph Callaway, wife and husband; Rocco and Ersilia Sablone, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees. Nos. 1 CA-CV 09-0631, 1 CA-CV 09-0696. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. November 2, 2010. *9

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1108 IN RE: LAC-MÉGANTIC TRAIN DERAILMENT LITIGATION ANNICK ROY, as special administrator of the estate of Jean-Guy Veilleux, deceased, individually and as next friend of minor, F.R.V., ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant, App

664 F.Supp.2d 752 (2009) In re FORD MOTOR CO. SPEED COTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. MDL No. 1718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2009. Order on Clarification and Reconsideration January 4, 2010. *754 Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Houston

MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER McCURN, Chief Judge. I. OVERVIEW This environmental litigation arises from the defendants’ alleged contamination of land and water in Schodack, New York. The plaintiff, the State of New York, filed its complaint on October 8, 1987, against defendants N. Storonske Cooperage Co. (“Storonske”) and its president, Michael Greenberg, pursuant to the Comprehensiv

42 Cal.Rptr.3d 2 (2006) 38 Cal.4th 264 132 P.3d 211 Amaani LYLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WARNER BROTHERS TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S125171. Supreme Court of California. April 20, 2006. *4 Mark Weidmann, Los Angeles, and Scott O. Cummings, Lon

By the Court. This appeal causes us to reconsider the protocols established by Commonwealth v. Fuller, 423 Mass. 216 (1996) (Fuller), and Commonwealth v. Bishop, 416 Mass. 169 (1993) (Bishop), which govern a defendant’s pretrial access to statutorily privileged records of witnesses in criminal cases. The defendant was convicted by a jury of rape of a child by force, G. L. c.

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

441 A.2d 673 (1982) STATE of Maine v. Richard STACK and Frederick Fothergill. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued September 8, 1981. Decided February 16, 1982. *674 Henry N. Berry, III, Dist. Atty., Peter G. Ballou, Deputy Dist. Atty., William Darrow, Michael McCarthy, Jonathan Chapman (orally), Law Student Interns, Portland,

786 F.Supp.2d 516 (2011) John PARENT, individually and as natural parent of Child "A" and Child "B," and on behalf of parents similarly situated, also known as Leon R. Koziol, Plaintiffs, v. State of NEW YORK; Jonathan Lippman, individually and as Chief Administrative Officer of the New York Unified Court System; Unified Court System of the State of New York; John W. Grow, individually and as State Court Judge; Charles C. Merrell, individually an

444 B.R. 51 (2010) In re BROADSTRIPE, LLC, et al., Debtors. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Broadstripe, LLC, on behalf of the estate of Broadstripe, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-10006 (CSS). Adversary No. 09-50966. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. September 2, 2010.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Laurie Ortolano v. Case No. 22-cv-326-LM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 124 P City of Nashua, et al. ORDER Plaintiff Laurie Ortolano has sued the City of Nashua, New Hampshire (“Nashua” or “the City”), its Mayor, several current and former Nashua emp

168 F.Supp.2d 1359 (2001) In re AMERICA ONLINE, INC. Version 5.0 Software Litigation. No. 00-1341. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 19, 2001. *1360 *1361 *1362 Justin Graem Witkin, Levin Middlebrooks Mabie Thomas, Mitchell et al, Pensacola, FL, Jos