Cases

2020 UT App 33 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAMES SEAMONS AND KADI SEAMONS, Appellees, v. LARRY G. WISER AND PATRICIA B. WISER, Appellants. Opinion No. 20180902-CA Filed March 5, 2020 First District Court, Logan Department The Honorable Thomas Willmore

251 P.3d 675 (2011) 2011 MT 56 360 Mont. 1 Lee WISER and Charles Conlan, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MONTANA BOARD OF DENTISTRY, Defendants and Appellees. No. DA 10-0230. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs December 1, 2010. Decided March 29, 2011. For Appellants: Jonathan Motl; Reynolds, M

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 41 The People &c., Respondent, v. Jonathan Batticks, Appellant. Jonathan R. McCoy, for appellant. Rebecca Hausner, for respondent. DiFIORE, Chief Judge:

129 P.3d 133 (2006) 2006 MT 20 331 Mont. 28 Lee WISER; R. Brent Kandarian; Cliff Christenot; Dave Comer; Douglas Crumb; Everett Vandeneeden; Allen Casteel; Frank Brisendine; Rob Carnahan; Ken Macpehrson; Chas Conlan; Aaron Hansemann; Grant Olson; John Mateskon; Mark Rittenhouse; and John Doe Plaintiffs 1-24, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE of Montana; DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Department of Labor

CONERY, Judge. _JjThis case was initially before this court on an appeal filed on behalf of Aspect Resources, LLC (Aspect Resources) and the intervenor, Aspect Energy, LLC (Aspect Energy), seeking to reverse the ruling of the district court in favor of Olympia Minerals, LLC and Olympia Minerals Leasing, LLC (collectively, Olympia)1 for breach of the August 1, 2000 contract designated as the North S

CONERY, Judge. |! This case involves a dispute over a seismic contract with an option/requirement to lease and develop minerals in Beauregard and Calcasieu Parishes. Plaintiffs, Olympia Minerals, LLC and Olympia Minerals Leasing, LLC, are referred to as Olympia in the opinion. The Olympia entities are successors in interest to El Paso Minerals, Inc. and El Paso Leasing, Inc. referred to as EPMI. Both El P

Order Brian Morris, United States District Court Judge Defendant Motl moves this Court to dismiss Plaintiff Tschida’s second, third, and fourth claims, and all claims for damages. (Doc. 26.) Motl argues that federal common law entitles him to qualified immunity for Tschida’s second claim, and that Montana law provides qualified immunity for Tschida’s third and fourth claims. Motl argues that damages are n

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 8, 2008 Session DOUG SATTERFIELD v. BREEDING INSULATION COMPANY ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-14000 W. Dale Young, Judge No. E2006-00903-SC-R11-CV - Filed September 9, 2008 JANI

572 F.2d 13 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 149, 16 Empl. Prac.Dec. P 8175Margaret M. BLIZARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jonathan E. FIELDING, M.D., as he is Commissioner of theDepartment of Public Health, Commonwealth ofMassachusetts, Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-1339. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. March 20, 1978.

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. *432 To safeguard investors in public companies and restore trust in the financial markets following the collapse of Enron Corporation, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

OPINION OF THE COURT SCHENCK, Senior Judge: A military judge sitting as a special court-martial found appellant guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of absence without leave (AWOL) (two specifications), wrongful use of marijuana (three specifications), and wrongful use of cocaine and methylenedioxymethampheta*546mine (MDMA)1

HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in Part VI: I write separately to express my view that the aftermath of Slatten’s mandamus petition did not, and could not, give rise to a realistic likelihood of prosecutorial vindictiveness. United States v. Meyer, 810 F.2d 1242, 1246 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Although the majority notes that “the extraordinary mandamus grant here, followed by a rather sharply-worde

*501SIMS, J., Dissenting. I respectfully dissent. In Government Code section 31000.61 (section 31000.6), the Legislature has provided an efficient and economical procedure for having counsel appointed for an assessor who has a conflict of interest with a board of supervisors. Unfortunately, the majority adopts an unnecessarily

419 F.Supp.2d 437 (2005) Jonathan SMITH, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. POSITIVE PRODUCTIONS, Respondent-Cross-Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. No. 05 Civ. 3748(MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 28, 2005. *438 *439 *440

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Lewis T. CARTER, Jr., Captain U.S. Army, Appellant No. 00-0314 Crim. App. No. 9701744 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued October 12, 2000 Decided March 28, 2001 GIERKE, J., delivered the opinio

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On February 12, 2009, while on final approach to the Buffalo Niagara International Airport, Continental Connection Flight 3407 crashed into a house in Clarence Center, N.Y., killing all 45 passengers, the four-person crew, and one person in the house. By order entered October 6, 2009, the United States Judicial Panel o

650 N.W.2d 220 (2002) 264 Neb. 505 Jonathan LUETHKE, Appellee, v. Ronald SUHR et al., Appellants. No. S-00-396. Supreme Court of Nebraska. August 9, 2002. *221 Stephanie Frazier Stacy, of Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt, Lincoln, for appellants. *222 Mi

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge: This action involves a long-running dispute between telecommunications carriers over access charges. Plaintiffs All American Telephone Company, Inc., Chase Com, and e-Pinnacle Communications, Inc. are competitive local exchange carriers-in lay terms, local telephone companies-operating in Utah and Nevada. Over a decade ago, Plaintiffs initiated an action against AT & T

520 F.Supp.2d 1175 (2007) John TRUE, etc., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Defendant. No. EDCV 07-287-YAP (OPx). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 22, 2007. *1176 *1177 Denise Davis Schwartzman, Michael D. Gottsch, Nicholas E. Chimicles, Chimicles & Tikellis

JANICE M. HOLDER, J., concurring and dissenting. I fully concur in the majority’s conclusion that Alcoa owed a duty to Ms. Satter-field to take reasonable steps to prevent her from suffering harm as a result of the risks created by the operation of Alcoa’s facility. I write separately to express my belief that any discussion of foreseeability in the context of duty encroaches up