Cases

HARRIS, J. The Estate of Jon Lopez (the "Estate") timely appeals the trial court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of Wilsonart, LLC and Samuel Rosario (collectively, "Appellees"). Under Florida's current summary judgment standard, we are compelled to conclude that conflicting evidence remained as to whether Rosario negligently operated his vehicle, which could allow a jury to apportion fault between the drivers. We therefo

HARRIS, J. The Estate of Jon Lopez (the "Estate") timely appeals the trial court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of Wilsonart, LLC and Samuel Rosario (collectively, "Appellees"). Under Florida's current summary judgment standard, we are compelled to conclude that conflicting evidence remained as to whether Rosario negligently operated his vehicle, which could allow a jury to apportion fault between the drivers. We therefo

February 15, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 287 341 Conn. 793 FEBRUARY, 2022 793 State v. Lopez STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RAMON LOPEZ (SC 20601) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js.

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs challenge statewide, at-large elections of all justices to the Supreme Court of Texas and judges to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 52 U.S.C. § 10301. They allege that at-large voting has diluted the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Benito Aguilera Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Motion for Sentence Adjustment and Downward Departure Under Extraordinary Circumstances of Serious Consequences Under Non-Citizen Status.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

356 S.W.3d 599 (2011) Randolph A. LOPEZ, M.D., Appellant, v. Johanna BROWN, Appellee. No. 14-10-01144-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 11, 2011. *600 Angela Marie Nolan, Richard M. Law, Stephanie Anne Sanders, Houston, for appellant. Scot Graves Doyen, Shelton Jon McDonald, Houston, for appellee.

743 N.W.2d 351 (2008) 274 Neb. 756 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee v. Norma E. LOPEZ, Appellant. No. S-06-1251. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 4, 2008. *353 James R. Mowbray and Robert W. Kortus, of Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy, for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Erin E. Leu

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs in this action worked for varying periods' of time as live-in superintendents at a low-income housing complex managed by defendant Poko-St. Ann L.P. (Poko). In their Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 10), plaintiffs allege that throughout their employment Poko violated the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and th

FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAY 15 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COU RT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SAMUEL VILLEGAS LOPEZ, No. 12-16084 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-0024

Opinion HALLER, Acting P. J. — Jose Lopez sued the national Jehovah’s Witnesses organization, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. (Watchtower), alleging his Bible instructor sexually abused him in 1986 when he was a child. Lopez asserted several legal theories, including failure to warn, negligent supervision, and negligent hiring/retenti

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JON GILBY, Appellant, v. KIMBERLEI ZANIOL, Appellee. No. 2D22-640 September 30, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Caroline Tesche Arkin, Judge.

Filed 7/20/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CYNTHIA LOPEZ, B315959 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC669038) v. KENNETH LOPEZ, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superi

698 F.Supp.2d 633 (2010) UNITED STATES of America ex rel Magdalis LOPEZ, Plaintiff/Relator, v. STRAYER EDUCATION, INC., Strayer University, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-589. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. March 18, 2010. *634 Shiva Sharifahmadian, Finkelstein Thompson LLP, Washingt

168 F.Supp.2d 1046 (2001) Kathleen LOPEZ-BURIC, Plaintiff, v. Officer David NOTCH; Officer Bradley Thelen; City of Waite Park; and Stearns County, Defendants. No. 00-CV-928 ADM/RLE. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 17, 2001. As Amended April 25, 2001. *1047 John G. Shulman, and David M. Sullivan,

03/04/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 9, 2020 JON VAZEEN v. MARTIN SIR Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 16C2388 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge ___________________________________

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed April 14, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00174-CR JON MATTHEW WOODLAND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

PD-1628-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/4/2015 4:16:01 PM Accepted 2/6/2015 2:43:38 PM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 888 KA 14-02278 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JON T. MAGLIOCCO, ALSO KNOWN AS JON MAGLIOCCO, ALSO KNOWN AS JON J. MAGLIOCCO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: Defendants Michael Skillern and Jon Craig Nelson appeal their convictions for mail fraud, wire fraud, and associated conspiracies, all of which arose out of their efforts to peddle non-existent gold to the public through their company, Own Gold LLC. Although Skillern and Nelson have raised a number of issues on appeal, our focus in this opinion is on Skillern's c

RULING DORSEY, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs renew their motion for class certification with respect to Counts I and III. Plaintiffs also move for summary judgment as to liability on Counts I and III. For the reasons below, both motions are granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs purchased a used car from defendant on March 23,1995. In conjunction with the credit purchase of this vehicle