Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jon E Collins”
State v. Collinspublic domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of June 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017." The following order has been entered on the motion filed on
Legregory Collins v. Statepublic domain
Ray, Judge. Larry Daymond “Mon” Gillespie and Legregory Collins, along with other co-defendants, were indicted for armed robbery, aggravated assault, and aggravated battery. Following a jury trial, Gillespie was convicted on August 9, 2011, of armed robbery and aggravated assault. He was acquitted of aggravated battery. Collins was con
In re Jon Porter, M.D.public domain
Reiber, C.J. ¶ 1. This case asks us to determine whether a physician can be held answerable as a matter of professional discipline solely on the basis of a physicians assistant’s (PA) unprofessional acts. The Board of Medical Practice concluded that it was not required to find Dr. Jon Porter guilty of unprofessional conduct based .solely on the acts of a PA whom he supervised. We aff
Collins v. Compass Group, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. RALLON, District Judge. This case involves claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Alabama Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 18). On June 14, 2013, the magistrate judge assigned this case entered a Report and Rec
People v. Collinspublic domain
815 N.E.2d 860 (2004) 351 Ill. App.3d 959 287 Ill.Dec. 216 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger COLLINS and William Bracy, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 1-03-0685, 1-03-0686. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. August 25, 2004. *861
in Re Jon Michael Pollockpublic domain
NUMBER 13-21-00130-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE JON MICHAEL POLLOCK On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ben
Collins v. Kiewit Construction Co.public domain
Jacobs, J. The plaintiff, Collins, an employee of N.B. Jon-Son Steel Erectors, Inc. (Jon-Son), a subcontractor, was injured at a work site where the defendant, Kiewit Construction Co. (Kiewit), was the general contractor. Temporary stairs providing access to a building were removed by Kiewit, and, failing to notice their absence, Collins fell when leaving the building. After Collins sued Kiewit for negligence, Kiewit filed a thi
Jon Matthew Woodland v. Statepublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed April 14, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00174-CR JON MATTHEW WOODLAND, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Collins v. Collins.730public domain
DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge I , Joni and Mitchell Collins’were divorced by decree entered on October 28, 2011. As part of the divorce, they executed a property-settlement agreement that was incorporated into the decree. Critical to this appeal, the agreement provided that Mitchell’s obligation to pay Joni alimony would terminate immediately upon Joni’s remarriag
Stepherson, Jon Paulpublic domain
PD-1628-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/4/2015 4:16:01 PM Accepted 2/6/2015 2:43:38 PM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00810-CV Jon Maniccia and Southwest Intelecom, Inc., Appellants v.
Jon Paul Stepherson v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed December 4, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-13-00128-CR __________ JON PAUL STEPHERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th District Court
State of Iowa v. Tanner Jon Kingpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-0158 Filed July 21, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TANNER JON KING, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt J. Stoebe, Judge. A defendant challenges his two convictions for first-degree murder. AFFIRMED. Jack Bjorn
Ruston, Lester Jonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-49,101-11 <
Jon Luer v. County of St. Louis, Missouripublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3512 ___________________________ Jon Luer; Andrea Steinebach lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellees v. Michael Clinton; Benjamin Selz l
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ARANZI RAE JON WILLIS, Petitioner, v. HON. DEBORAH BERNINI, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, Respondent Judge, STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest.
People v. Collinspublic domain
2021 IL App (1st) 170597 FIRST DISTRICT THIRD DIVISION March 31, 2021 No. 1-17-0597 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the
People v. Collinspublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Ohio Democratic Party v. Jon Hustedpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0204p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY; DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF ┐ CUYAHOGA COUNTY; MONTGOMERY COUNTY │ DEMOCRATIC PARTY; J
Stage Stores, Inc. v. Jon Gunnersonpublic domain
Harvey Brown, Justice, concurring. This case presents an issue of contract interpretation: What did the parties mean when they agreed to a “reasoned award”? The Court holds that the “award’s failure to provide any reasoning regarding Stage’s third contention prevents a determination that the award is reasoned.” It concludes that, under an exception to the functus officio doctr