Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HENRY R. WILHOLT, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees and Expert Expenses [Docket No. 30]. Defendants seek $47,147.50 in fees and expenses incurred in their defense of this case, from January 7, 2014 until July 31, 2014. For the reasons set forth below, the Cou

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ZIMMER BIOMET ) HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-2966 (ABJ) ) INTERNAL REVENU

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1269 ALEJANDRO YEATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dis

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1269 ALEJANDRO YEATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dis

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIMOTHY H. MEYERS, Securityholder ) Representative, solely in his capacity as ) representative of the former Embody, ) Inc. Securityholders, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-0732-BWD ) ZIMMER BI

501 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2007) INVERNESS HOLDINGS, LTD., Plaintiff, v. Fred J. SCHAAFSMA, Joseph L. Zimmers, Z & Z Enterprises of Traverse City, Inc., Legacy Pines, LLC, Ron Williamson, Randy Williamson, Mission Bay Construction, and Morgan Farms Development, LLC, Defendants. No. 1:06-CV-824. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 14, 2007.

ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: *478Currently pending before the Court are the parties' motions for summary judgment (D.I. 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 316, 356, 411) and Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony and opinions. (D.I. 317, 321, 322, 327). The parties have fully briefed the issues (D.I. 314, 318, 320, 323, 324, 328, 351, 353,

MEMORANDUM GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge. I.INTRODUCTION In this correction of inventorship action, plaintiffs W. Norman Scott, M.D., (“Dr. Scott”) and Giles R. Scuderi, M.D., (“Dr. Scuderi” or collectively, “the plaintiffs”) seek to add themselves as inventors of U.S. Patent No. 6,123,729, U.S. Patent No. 6,402,786, and U.S. Patent No. 6,319,283 (“the patents”) presently assig

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT TANYA RENE JOHNSON, f/k/a Tanya  Rene Zimmer, Debtor-Appellant, v. WILLIAM H. ZIMMER,  No. 11-2034 Creditor-Appellee, ROBERT R. BROWNING, Trustee-Intervenor.  Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

NO. 12-07-00139-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PALESTINE HERALD-PRESS CO., NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS, INC., AND § APPEAL FROM THE 2ND SCOTT TYLER, APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MARK ZIMMER, APPELLEE § CHEROKEE COUNTY,

WATT, J.; { 1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Tenth Circuit) certified a single question of first impression to this Court under the Revised Uniform Certifica- *465§ tion of Questions of Law Act, 20 0.S8.2011 1601, et seq. We are not asked whether the negligence claim is preempted by federal law as the Tenth Cireuit has resolved that preempti

NO. 12-07-00139-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PALESTINE HERALD-PRESS CO., NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS, I

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT TRAGUS SURGICAL, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY AND MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on three motions: defendant Tragus Surgical, Inc.’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint (Doc. No. 29); plaintiff Stryker Sales Cor*612

WATT, C.J. T1 A single dispositive issue is presented on appeal: whether the affidavit of merit1 requirement of 63 O.S. Supp2008 § 1-1708.1E2 * is constitutional. We determine *863that the statute is an unconstitutional special law prohibited by the Oklahoma Constitution art. 5, § 46.3

766 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2011) Sara MONROE, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER U.S. INC., Zimmer, Inc., and Does 1 through 25, Defendants. No. CIV. S-08-2944 FCD/EFB. United States District Court, E.D. California. February 14, 2011. *1015 Stewart C. Altemus, Altemus & Wagner, Redding, CA, Paul J. Schachter, PHV, Penny Hendy, PHV, Ronald E. John

474 F.Supp.2d 737 (2007) Marguerite J. SOUFFLAS, Plaintiff, v. ZIMMER, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-4753. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 21, 2007. *738 *739 *740 John P. Kopesky, Sheller Ludwig & Badey, Philadelphia, P

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions: 1) Douglas Spencer’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Spencer”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 17); and 2) Annett Holdings, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Annett”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 18). Annett filed a resistance to Spencer’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Clerks’ No. 23) and Spencer replied (Clerk’s No. 28). Spe

484 F.Supp.2d 715 (2007) Mildred BOTNICK, et al., Plaintiffs v. ZIMMER, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:03 CV 01794. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 27, 2007. *716 *717 Jeffrey A. Leikin, Nurenberg, Paris, Heller & McCarthy, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs

M. J. KELLY, P.J. In this suit for mandamus, defendants, the Executive Director of the Michigan Administrative Hearing System (the Hearing System), Michael Zimmer, and the Director of the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), Steven Hilfinger, appeal by right the trial court’s writ of mandamus compelling them to cause their agencies to hold hearings on workers’ compensation claims arising out of injuries

[Cite as Zimmer Power Co., L.L.C. v. Vogel, 2023-Ohio-1953.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Zimmer Power Company, LLC, : Appellant-Appellant, : No. 22AP-451 (ERAC No. 21-7104) v. :