Cases

SUMMARY OPINION SMITH, Judge. I 1 Angela Michelle Wolf pled guilty to five counts of Unlawful Purchase of Pseu-doephedrine While Subject to Oklahoma Methamphetamine Offender Registry Act in violation of 63 0.S8.Supp.2010, § 2-701(B), after one former felony conviction, in the District Court of Garfield County, Case No. CF-2011-405.1 In accordance with a negotiated plea the Hon

BROWN, C.J. ¶ 1. For what proved to be a limited time, the legislature put the "Truth in Auto Law" into effect. It was the law from November 1, 2009, until the legislature replaced it, effective November 1, 2011. During its brief lifespan, the law prohibited reducing clauses and created broader protections for underinsured motorist coverage. The law explicitly stated that it applied prospectively — only affecting insurance polici

874 N.E.2d 582 (2007) Gina M. WOLFE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ilene WOLF, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-06-0161. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. August 17, 2007. Rehearing Denied September 28, 2007. *583 Law Offices of Donald L. Johnson, Chicago (Donald L. Johnson & Julie A. Boynton, o

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Timothy Eric Wolf Child, a Native American, appeals a special condition of supervised release imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse. The special condition, condition 9, prohibited Wolf Child from residing with or being in the company of any child under the age of 18, including

787 N.W.2d 575 (2010) Pamela A. WOLF, Respondent, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Companies, Relators. No. A10-809. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 26, 2010. Gary L. Manka, Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves & Sobol, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent. Mary E. Kohl, Stacey A. Molde, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis,

8 Cal.Rptr.3d 649 (2004) 114 Cal.App.4th 1343 Gary K. WOLF et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Walt Disney Pictures and Television, Real Party in Interest. No. B169265. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. January 21, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing February 19, 2004.

21 P.3d 428 (2000) Ivory CHRYAR and Elaine Bailey, Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Duane WOLF, a/k/a Dawn Duane Wolf, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 99CA1360. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. September 14, 2000. Certiorari Denied March 19, 2001. *429 Alpern, Myers, Stuart, Scheuerman

Gina Augustine v. Steven Wolf, No. 2322, September Term 2023. Opinion by Ripken, J. COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL – EFFECT OF DENIAL OF FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CUSTODY PROCEEDING A court’s denial of a final protective order does not later preclude evidence, argument, or judicial findings of abuse in subsequent custody proceedings. COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL – EFFECT OF DENIAL OF FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CUSTODY PROCEEDING Just as courts in custody modification proceedings are not precluded from considering ev

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) ESTHER OVIOSU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2186 (RBW) )

WOLF, J. Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the State had proven appellant’s violation and in revoking appellant’s probation. However, the record does not reflect a written order of revocation. Pursuant to this court’s holding in Fowler v. State, 79 So.3d 868, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), “[a] formal, written order of revocation is requi

519 F.Supp.2d 674 (2007) John B. WOLF, Sr., and Margaret A. Wolf, Plaintiffs, v. BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Shannon Nelson, and Two Unidentified Michigan Residents John Doe and Jane Doe, Defendants. No. 1:07-cv-622. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 25, 2007. *675 Philip R. Rosi, Ro

PER CURIAM. The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgments and sentences rendered on July 2, 2014, in Duval County Circuit Court ease numbers 2012-CF-006828 and 2012-CF-006828, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as notices of appeal in each of the foregoing cases. If petitioner qualifies for the appointment of counsel at pub

231 F.Supp.2d 58 (2002) Geoffrey & Mary Lou MANIFOLD, Plaintiffs, v. WOLF COACH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 01-1114(RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 30, 2002. *59 William Parker Lightfoot, Jr., Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, Depaolis & Lightfoot, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASYLUMWORKS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-cv-3815 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 7, 2022, this Court held that two rules co

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. WOLF, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. Trametrich D. Johnson petitions the court for habeas corpus relief, arguing that he is imprisoned pursuant to a sentence imposed in a case in which he was incompetent to stand trial, and that the trial court erred in failing to order a competency hearing. We rejected a similar claim made by his appellate counsel on direct appeal. Johnson then sought postconviction relief, arguing among other things that h

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., concur.

955 S.W.2d 626 (1997) Janet L. WOLF and Gerald S. Bowker, individually and as representatives of all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Don SUNDQUIST, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee; John Knox Walkup, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee; Victor S. Johnson, III, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for the 20th Judicial District for the State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) TAMMY HARTZLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3802 (GMH) ) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ) Secretary of