⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Johnson v. Washburn”

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 1× · 2010 WI App 50; 781 N.W.2d 706; 324 Wis. 2d 366; 2010 Wisc. App. LEXIS 128
781 N.W.2d 706 (2010) 2010 WI App 50 Keith J. JOHNSON, Alf R. Johnson and Dolores R. Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WASHBURN COUNTY and Town of Spooner, Defendants-Respondents, Washburn County Board of Supervisors and Spooner Town Board, Defendants. No. 2009AP371. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on Briefs September 22, 2009.
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011-12-15 · Published · cited 12× · 2011 ND 240; 809 N.W.2d 288; 2011 N.D. LEXIS 239; 2011 WL 6223035
CROTHERS, Justice. [¶1] Leah Richard appeals from a judgment dismissing her claims for negligent hiring, supervision and retention, and assault and battery against Washburn Public Schools ("the District"). We affirm the district court's dismissal of Richard's claims for negligent hiring and assault and battery, which she does not challenge on appeal. We reverse dismissal of Rich
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2016-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 237 W. Va. 347; 787 S.E.2d 618; 2016 W. Va. LEXIS 440
Davis, Justice: The petitioners herein and defendants below, Sugar Rock, Inc., et al. (collectively, “Sugar Rock”), 1 . appeal from an order entered January 16, 2015, by the Circuit Court of Ritchie County. By that order, the circuit court granted partial summary judgment to the respondents herein and
Johnson v. Washburnpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945-07-06 · Published · cited 0× · 146 Neb. 335; 19 N.W.2d 563; 167 A.L.R. 1238; 1945 Neb. LEXIS 94
Simmons, C. J. In county court the amount claimed by the plaintiff in an action for rents was $1,000. Judgment was rendered for that amount, together with interest from the date of the filing of the petition and costs. Defendant contends that such judgment is void, as exceeding the jurisdiction of the court. He also contends that the garnishment proceeding was void. The trial court held against defendant. We affirm the judgme
Washburn v. Thomaspublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001-06-07 · Published · cited 2× · 37 P.3d 465; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2823; 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 909; 2001 WL 618562
37 P.3d 465 (2002) James L. WASHBURN and Kay A. Washburn, d/b/a Washburn Brothers, a Colorado partnership; and Roy V. Dyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The Ronald W. THOMAS and Raymond Wayne Thomas Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust, a trust; Sharon I. Bennett; Kent Allen; Thomas L. Williams and Dean C. Williams, d/b/a Williams & Williams Realtors; Williams & Williams Marketing Services, Inc.; Heartland Community Foundation; Ronald W. Thoma
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-12-12 · Published · cited 2× · 204 N.E.3d 45; 2022 Ohio 4453
[Cite as Washburn v. OhioHealth Corp., 2022-Ohio-4453.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY RYAN WASHBURN, CASE NO. 9-22-08 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. OHIOHEALTH CORPORATION, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Court
Washington Supreme Court · 2013-10-17 · Published · cited 107× · 178 Wash. 2d 732; 310 P.3d 1275
Fairhurst, J. ¶1 This case presents questions about the tort liability of a municipal corporation. Paul Chan Kim murdered his partner, Baerbel K. Roznowski, after officer Andrew Hensing of the Federal Way Police Department (Department) served Kim with an antiharassment order forbidding him to contact or remain near Roznowski. Roznowski’s two daughters filed suit against the city of Federal Way (City), alleging that Hensing’s negl
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989-05-16 · Published · cited 4× · 379 S.E.2d 65; 93 N.C. App. 657; 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 380
379 S.E.2d 65 (1989) David Grant WASHBURN and Nancy Little Washburn v. James VANDIVER, d/b/a Vandiver Auto Sales. No. 8826DC680. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 16, 1989. *66 Michael David Bland, Matthews, for plaintiff-appellees. James J. Caldwell, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant. JOHNSON, Judge.
Miller v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012-10-05 · Published · cited 136× · 295 Kan. 636; 289 P.3d 1098; 2012 WL 4773559; 2012 Kan. LEXIS 480
Beier, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority’s resolution of the nonconstitutional issues in this case. I also agree with the majority’s determination that the statutoiy cap on noneconomic damages does not violate the doctrine of separation of powers. I would, however, reverse and remand to the district court because K.S.A. 60-19a02, as applied to plaintiff Amy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020-01-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 ME 18
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 18 Docket: And-19-47 Argued: November 4, 2019 Decided: January 30, 2020 Revised: June 23, 2020 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, and HUMPHREY, JJ.* ESTATE OF DAVID H. WASHBURN JABAR, J. [¶1] Laurie Kennedy appeals from an order of the Androscoggin County Probate Court (Dubois, J.) denying her p
Johnson v. Washburnpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 98 Ala. 258
STONE, C. J. The judgment of the City Court, from which the present appeal was prosecuted, was rendered March 30, 1892. The bill of exceptions was signed May 30, 1892, precisely two months after the judgment was ren-*260clered. A motion is made by appellee to strike tbe bill of exceptions from tbe transcript because tbe same was signed and bears date at a time when tbe co
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020-01-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 ME 18
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 18 Docket: And-19-47 Argued: November 4, 2019 Decided: January 30, 2020 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, and HUMPHREY, JJ.* ESTATE OF DAVID H. WASHBURN JABAR, J. [¶1] Laurie Kennedy appeals from an order of the Androscoggin County Probate Court (Dubois, J.) denying her petition for formal adjud
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
02/05/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 18, 2018 Session STEVEN ANDERSON v. RUSSELL WASHBURN, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Trousdale County No. 2018-CV-4687 John D. Wootten, Jr., Judge No. M2018-00661-CCA-R3-HC
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 862 F. Supp. 2d 871; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70396; 2012 WL 1847446
ORDER LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 874 *874II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND................................874 III. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND.....................................875 A. Schemes
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993-03-16 · Published · cited 4× · 610 N.E.2d 293; 1993 Ind. App. LEXIS 210; 1993 WL 69174
RUCKER, Judge, dissenting. I concur with the majority's decision upholding the Commission's cease and desist order against Washburn Realtors for its unlawful discrimination against Sharon Johnson. However, I must respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority's decision reversing the Commission's award of emotional distress damages and punitive damages. The majority correctly cites
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015-08-07 · Published · cited 38× · 121 A.3d 1008; 2015 Pa. Super. 168; 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 454; 2015 WL 4712600
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: Northern Health Facilities, Inc., d/b/a Tremont Health & Rehabilitation, an Ex-tendicare entity (collectively “Tremont”), appeals from the June 9, 2014 order overruling preliminary objections in the nature of a petition to compel arbitration. After careful review, we affirm. On March 4, 2011, Donald Wash
District Court, W.D. New York · 2009-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 615 F. Supp. 2d 126; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42297; 2009 WL 1423370
615 F.Supp.2d 126 (2009) Robert WESOLOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen A. WASHBURN, M. Hemenway, Valerie R. Grover, Lawrence Weingartner, Paul J. Titus, Michael McGinnis, Defendants. No. 03-CV-6424L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 18, 2009. *127 Robert Wesolowski, Fallsburg, NY, pro se. Benjamin A. Bruce, New
Harmon v. Washburnpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008-06-04 · Published · cited 9× · 2008 SD 42; 751 N.W.2d 297; 2008 S.D. LEXIS 40; 2008 WL 2303499
*299ROEHR, Circuit Judge. [¶ 1.] Edith G. Harmon (Edith) and Joseph Harmon (Joseph) (collectively Har-mons) brought a negligence action for personal injuries against Anita M. Washburn (Washburn). The trial court denied Har-mons’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Washburn’s negligence and on the issue of Edith’s contributory negligence. The jury retu
Washington Supreme Court · 2013-10-17 · Published · cited 0×
FILE"' IN CLERKS OFFICI ' IUPREMEOOURT, STATE OF"tM . . . . ~~02t~13~ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CAROLA WASHBURN and ) JANET LOR, individually, and on ) behalf of the ESTATE OF BAERBEL) K. ROZNOWSKI, a deceased person,) ) Respondents, ) No. 87906-1 ) v. ) ENBANC
Navajo Nation Supreme Court · 1977-01-17 · Published · cited 0× · 1 Navajo Rptr. 114
KIRK, Chief Justice This is an appeal from contempt order issued by the Trial Court of the Judicial District of Shiprock, finding the appellant Ned McKensley in Contempt of an order issued by the same Trial Court on October 15, 1974. Having heard oral arguments on behalf of both parties on December 17, 1976, this court has determined that the facts are as follows: 1. A subleas