Cases

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

404 P.2d 159 (1965) Howard JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary, Respondent. No. 21738. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. July 12, 1965. Rehearing Denied August 3, 1965. Howard Johnson, pro se. Donald N. Pacheco, Denver, for respondent. FRANTZ, Justice. This is an original proceed

CHILSON, District Judge. This matter came on for hearing before the Court on January 11, 1965, the petitioner appearing by Mr. Isaac Mell-man, his retained counsel, and the respondent appearing by Mr. James W. Creamer, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of the State of Colorado. From the hearing it appears that the petitioner was charged in the State court with the unlawful and premeditated murder of one Ray

Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice McWilliams. In a direct information it was alleged that Albert Johnson and one Charles Wesley Ray “did make an assault upon Frank W. Smith and . . . feloniously and violently and by force and intimidation did rob, seize, steal, take and carry away a Smith and Wesson revolver from the person and against the will of said Frank W. Smith; and that said defendants . . . when they so ro

Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice McWilliams. In a direct information it was alleged that Albert Johnson and one Charles Wesley Ray “did make an assault upon Frank W. Smith and . . . feloniously and violently and by force and intimidation did rob, seize, steal, take and carry away a Smith and Wesson revolver from the person and against the will of said Frank W. Smith; and that said defendants . . . when they so ro

234 F.Supp. 866 (1964) James Albert JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Respondent. Civ. A. No. 8431. United States District Court D. Colorado. April 14, 1964. John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, Colo., for respondent. Larry M. Baker, Denver, Colo., for petitioner. *867

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the trial court, denying the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed for the reasons so ably expressed by the opinion of that court reported in 234 F.Supp. 866.

Appellate Case: 15-6190 Document: 259 Date Filed: 08/17/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 17, 2026

Appellate Case: 15-6190 Document: 256 Date Filed: 08/14/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 14, 2026

532 F.2d 754 Tinsleyv.Johnson No. 75-1660 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 3/1/76 1 E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 78 EAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Unpublished v. : Memorandum and

MEMORANDUM OPINION GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge. In this action, which was removed from the Circuit Court of the City of Charlottes-ville, plaintiffs Daisy Tinsley, on behalf of herself and as guardian of her daughter, Kaylee Twyman (“Kaylee”), and Jermaine Twyman assert claims against defendants Heather Streich, M.D. (“Dr. Streich”), Gary Fang, M.D. (“Dr. Fang”), University of Virginia Physicia

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12826 MARK S. TINSLEY vs. TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM & others.1 Middlesex. A

In Division TERRENCE TYRELL TINSLEY, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) No. SD38095 ) v. ) Filed: March 4, 2024 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, )

325 N.W.2d 177 (1982) STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. William Ridings TINSLEY, aka William Reynolds, Defendant and Appellant. Cr. No. 834. Supreme Court of North Dakota. October 20, 1982. *178 Teevens, Johnson & Montgomery, Minot, for defendant and appellant; argued by Bruce Montgomery, Minot. Michael

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 95 Appellant was indicted and convicted for lying about her employment status to receive Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) from the Texas Department of Human Resources. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 32.46 (Vernon Supp. 1985). Trial was to the court, and punishment was

FILED DEC ~ 2 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cC|erk. U.S. D|strlct& Bankruptcy Fabian Tinsley, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v ) civil Acci@n No. /3- /f ) ) United States of America, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a District of Columbia prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fairton, New Jersey, has submitted pro se a document captioned Petition for Commitment While Serving Pursuant to D.C. Code § 24-502, and 18 U.S.C. § 4241, and an application to proceed in f

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED MAY, 1997 SESSION September 9, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) No. 03C01-9608-CC-00305 Appellee, )

258 S.W.3d 920 (2008) Eldon T. TINSLEY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent. No. 28574. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. August 8, 2008. *921 Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney Gener

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ABBIE CRITES-LEONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72) and Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability and Liquidated Damages (Doc. 116). I. Background Plaintiffs comprise a group of current and former employees who worked for Defendant Cov