Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASTEL, United States District Judge. This is an action to enjoin the enforcement of a provision of New York Election Law. According to the parties, the provision bars the taking of “ballot selfies,” the act of photographing one’s image together with one’s marked ballot for the purpose of posting the photograph on a social media site. Celebrities, politicians and government leaders, even Po

' MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASTEL, Senior District Judge: These are the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law after a bench trial of an action to permanently enjoin a provision of New York Election Law that prohibits the showing of a marked ballot to another person as applied to the taking of a photograph depicting an individual along with that individual’s marked

186 F.Supp.2d 157 (2002) Eric SILBERBERG, Plaintiff, v. Richard LYNBERG, Jill Defelice, Paul Locicero, Town of Derby, Town of Ansonia, Town of Shelton, Town of Seymour, Town of Woodbridge, and Town of Monroe, Defendants. No. Civ. 3:99CV02249AWT. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 20, 2002. *158

124 Cal.Rptr.2d 650 (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 869 Diane L. JOHNSON et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; California Cryobank, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. B155896. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two. August 30, 2002. Rehearing Denied September 25, 2002.

ACKER, Presiding Judge. Silas Pearson brought this suit for himself and as next friend for his and his deceased wife’s minor children against George Silberberg, Leopold Silberberg, and J. C. Brewer, to cancel a deed made by Silas Pearson and wife to George and Leopold Silberberg, to remove clouds from their title, and to be quieted in their possession of the land described in the petition, and to recover rent for about fifty acre

This cause is before us upon certified questions from the Tenth District. The following portion of the certificate will disclose everything necessary to answers to the questions propounded: "This suit was instituted in the Justice Court of Hill County by J. D. Johnson, defendant in error herein, against Amos Durham, S.D. Durham, the First National Bank of Waco, and plaintiffs in error D. B. Clonts and J. B. Holder. The parties will be designated as in the trial court. The justic

Gaines, Associate Justice. On the thirteenth day of March, 1884, E. N. Stone & Co., by E. N. Stone, a member of the firm, executed to J. M. Robinson Sc Co., an instrument conveying to them a stock of goods and authorizing them to sell the property *400and to apply the proceeds first to the payment of the expenses of the trust and then to the discharge of a debt due b

766 F.Supp.2d 504 (2011) Ryan LESSEM and Douglas Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. Jayceon Terrell TAYLOR p/k/a the Game, UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music Group, Inc., Interscope Records, Inc., Universal Music Corp., Warner Chappell Music, Inc., Music of Windswept, Black Wall Street Records, LLC, and Black Wall Street Publishing, LLC, Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 10601(LLS). United States District Court, S.D. Ne

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 248 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 249 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 532 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 533 A documentary letter of credit is a method of payment whereby the promise of a stable financial source, usually a bank, i

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are several motions relating to the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and choice of venue. The defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 38) and an Alternative Motion to Strike Request for Injunctive Relief and Class Allegations (Docket No. 45), to which the plaintiffs filed a consolidated Respons

750 F.Supp.2d 1061 (2007) Victoria GONZALEZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DREW INDUSTRIES INC., a Delaware corporation; Kinro, Inc., an Ohio corporation; Kinro Texas Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, d/b/a Better Bath Components; and Skyline Corporation, an Indiana corporation, Defendants. Case No. CV 06-08233 DDP (JWJx). United States District C

MEMORANDUM * Michael Alan Eddy (Eddy) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his state law claims for breach of contract, fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud against Radar Pictures, Inc. (Radar), Interscope Communications, Inc. (Interscope), and Warner Bros., Pictures (Warner Bros.),1 as well as its grant of summary judgment on his action under § 301(a) of the Labor M

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CLEARCORRECT OPERATING, LLC, CLEARCORRECT PAKISTAN (PRIVATE), LTD., Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Intervenor ______________________ 2014-1527 ______________________ Appeal from the U

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 705 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 706 Appellant Andrew Sanchez, a pitcher, was seriously injured when struck by a line drive hit by an aluminum bat. He filed suit

60 Cal.App.4th 324 (1997) RAFFI PANDAZOS, an Incompetent Person, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; DAVID THOMPSON et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. B115414. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. December 22, 1997. *325 COUNSEL Richard R. Sanderso

Sometimes, because of congested court dockets and scheduling difficulties, the "direct calendar" judge who is assigned a case for all purposes is not the judge who conducts the trial. Such a reassignment can lead, as happened in the present case, to trouble. Certain pairs of proceedings must be heard by the same judge if he or she is able to do so: for example, *Page 678 trials and new trial motions. (See Code Civ. Proc., §

645 N.W.2d 355 (2002) Dale "J.R." HEIDBREDER, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Kathleen Jean CARTON, a/k/a Katie Carton, a/k/a Kate Carton, Respondent, M.J.P., et al., Respondents. No. C0-01-739. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 13, 2002. *360 Mark A. Olson, Olson Law Office, Burnsville, for appellant. Jill Alise Adkins, Rink

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II., IV. and V. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1820 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PR

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 606 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 607 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAY