Cases

Owens, J. ¶1 — Appellant Kimme Putman sued respondents for negligently failing to diagnose her ovarian cancer. The trial judge dismissed her lawsuit because she failed to file a certificate of merit from a medical expert, as required for medical malpractice lawsuits under RCW 7.70.150. Putman challenges the constitutionality of the certificate of merit requirement on a number of grounds. We hold that RCW 7.70.150 is unconstitut

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 81621-7-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID M. PUTMAN, ) PUBLISHED OPINION ) (IN P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS JASON D. WOODARD, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court for hearing on July 16, 2014, on the Motion to Dismiss Adversary Proceeding (the “Motion”) (A.P. Dkt. # 5)1 filed by AM Solutions, LLC (the “Defendant”) and the Response filed by plaintiffs Rickie D. Putman and Lorraine A. Putman (the “Debtors”)(A.P. Dkt. # 12). A

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00358-CV __________________ IN RE THEODORE PUTMAN AND LITCHFIELD CAVO, LLP __________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 60th Distri

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michelle M. Putman, appeals the division of marital property by the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, following her divorce from plaintiff-appellee, J. Lee Putman. {¶ 2} Lee and Michelle were married from September 21, 1996 until June 30, 2006. Lee filed his divorce complaint on April 14, 2006. The parties had one ch

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00409-CV __________________ GOOD DEAL TRUCKING, INC. AND THEODORE PUTMAN, Appellants V. MARY GERAC, Appellee _________________________________________________

PER CURIAM: Edwin Putman, a white male, appeals following the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“the VA”) in his employment discrimination and retaliation suit under Title VII. Putman argues that the district court erred in various respects by rejecting his claims. I. We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment

216 P.3d 374 (2009) Kimme PUTMAN, Appellant, v. WENATCHEE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, P.S., a Washington professional service corporation; Patrick J. Wendt, M.D.; David B. Levitsky, M.D., Respondents, and Shawn C. Kelley, M.D.; John Doe No. 1; John Doe No. 2; Jane Doe No. 1; and Jane Doe No. 2, Defendants. No. 80888-1. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued February 24, 20

BUTTLER, J. Petitioner appeals from a determination of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) denying him unemployment compensation on the grounds that he "voluntarily left work without good cause,” ORS 657.176(2)(c). The Board adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the referee, which we set forth here: "(1) Claimant worked for employer for approximately six weeks and until he voluntar

ZAGER, Justice. Ricky Lee Putman was charged with one count of first-degree sexual abuse for allegedly performing a sex act on L.R., a two-year-old girl. Putman filed a motion in limine that sought to exclude evidence of child pornography found on his computer and other electronic devices. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied the motion in limine, with limitations. The district court allowed the State’s expe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 12–0022 Filed June 13, 2014 Amended August 26, 2014 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. RICKY LEE PUTMAN, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Fayette County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. A criminal defendant seeks further review of a court of appeals decision affirming a distri

668 F.Supp.2d 1122 (2009) Maurice JOHNSON-BEY, Plaintiff, v. Indiana DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Aurelius Allen-Bey, Plaintiff, v. Indiana Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. Nelson Harris-El, Plaintiff, v. Indiana Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. Antonio Putman-Bey, Plaintiff, v. Indiana Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. Nos. 3:09-C

The appellant, Harold Dilton Putman, was convicted of burglary in the third degree, theft of property in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and sexual abuse in the *Page 1329 first degree. He was sentenced as a habitual felony offender to life imprisonment on each conviction, with the sentences to run concurrently. He was also convicted of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole. He raises

01/23/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 15, 2017 Session JULIA PUTNAM ET AL. v. JOHN W. LEACH ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF BRYANE R. LITSINBERGER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000415-16 Mary L. Wagner, Judge

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Appellant William Howard Putman was convicted of two counts of murder and sentenced to death for each count on September 17, 1982, in Cook County, Georgia.' On April 22, 1997, Appellant filed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging his Cook County convictions and sentences as constitutionally infirm. The district court denied the petition. See Put

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of St. Clair County, in Equity, Ashville Division, overruling the demurrer of appellant Putman to the cross-bill of appellee Davis. The dispute concerns title to the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 2, Township 14, Range 4, in St. Clair County, a forty acre tract of land known as the John Jester place. The proceedings in this case were instituted by Davis in an action of ejectment filed on the law side of the circuit co

146 Ind. App. 55 (1969) 252 N.E.2d 601 ST. JOSEPH BANK AND TRUST CO. v. PUTMAN AND CRIPE D/B/A C. & P. OIL CO. No. 369A44. Court of Appeals of Indiana. Filed December 3, 1969. Rehearing denied January 7, 1970. Transfer denied April 6, 1970. *56 Milton A. Johnson, Jo

This opinion addresses two appeals from criminal convictions arising in the New Philadelphia Municipal Court. Defendants-appellants, Richard Johnson and Gerald Snyder ("appellants"), both appeal from their convictions for public indecency, under R.C. 2907.09(A)(2). Appellant Johnson argues the following two assignments of error: "Assignment of Error No. I "The trial court erred in failing to grant the mot

The defendant-appellant was convicted of rape, R.C. 2907.02, by a Stark County common pleas court jury. The court sentenced appellant to ten to twenty-five years in the state penitentiary at Lucasville. The appellant assigns two errors: "Assignment of Error No. I "The trial judge erred in admitting the testimony of an incompetent witness in violation of Wade Terrell Johnson's Sixth and

LAY, Chief Judge. Andrew Putman and Donald Favors appeal from a judgment denying plaintiffs damages for alleged deprivation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The authorities sued were Elmer Gerloff, Gasconade County Sheriff, and James Crowe, who was Gerloff’s deputy in 1976. The district court directed a verdict for the deputy, Crowe, and thereafter submitted plaintiffs’ case against t