Cases

DENIED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Aff. Cir. Ct. (Jackson)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM. Trametrich D. Johnson petitions the court for habeas corpus relief, arguing that he is imprisoned pursuant to a sentence imposed in a case in which he was incompetent to stand trial, and that the trial court erred in failing to order a competency hearing. We rejected a similar claim made by his appellate counsel on direct appeal. Johnson then sought postconviction relief, arguing among other things that h

HASELTON, C. J. Defendant appeals a judgment in an action for battery and negligence arising from an incident in which defendant engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse with plaintiff without disclosing that he carries the herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2), commonly known as genital herpes. Plaintiff consequently became infected with genital herpes and brought this action. Defendant argues, inter alia, that the trial cou

Phipps, Chief Judge. Husband and wife DeRienzia and Vernice Johnson appeal the dismissal of their lawsuit against Michael Jones, M.D. Because the trial court correctly concluded that their claims were time-barred, we affirm. On December 20, 2012, the Johnsons sued Jones for damages, delineating four counts in their complaint. Count 1 alleged that Vernice Johnson and Jones had entered into a patient-physic

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge, dissenting. Although the majority would affirm the chancellor’s decision declaring a prescriptive easement across a driveway owned by the appellants’ (deacons of Unity Baptist Church), I believe that appellees failed to prove adverse use of the property as required by our case law. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. Danny and Connie Jones purchased a tract

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Douglas Johnson, an architect, brought this suit alleging, inter alia, that his architectural drawings were altered and used without his permission in violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 102(a)(5) and (8), and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). Johnson brought his copyright infringement and false designation of origin claims against Defendants Theresa Jones, Daniel Tos

149 F.3d 494 1998 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,799 Douglas A. JOHNSON, doing business as Douglas Johnson &Associates, Inc.; Professional Management Co.,Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,v.Theresa C. JONES; John C. Uznis; Uznis Deneweth Co., Defendants,Daniel A. Tosch; Progressive Associates, Inc.,Individually, Jointly and Severally,Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 3-A, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered May 15, 1996, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition with prejudice. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The burden of proof in a paternity proceeding rests upon the petitioner, who must “establish paternity by

OPINION AND ORDER SETTING FORTH THE COURT’S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ROSEN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This copyright infringement/breach of contract action was tried by the Court without a jury May 15-22, 1995. In his Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Douglas Johnson, an architect, alleges that Theresa Jones, the owner of a home located at 1100 Orch

515 U.S. 304 (1995) JOHNSON et al. v. JONES No. 94-455. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 18, 1995. Decided June 12, 1995. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT *305 Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Charles A. Rothfeld argued the cause for

885 F.Supp. 1008 (1995) Douglas A. JOHNSON, d/b/a Douglas A. Johnson & Associates, and Professional Management Co., Plaintiffs, v. Theresa C. JONES, Daniel A. Tosch, Progressive Associates, Inc., John C. Uznis and Uznis Deneweth Co., Individually, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. No. 94-CV-70497-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 20,