Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In this action, Plaintiff Karen Johnson seeks reversal of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Before the Court are Plaintiffs motion for judgment of reversal and Defendant’s motion for judgment of aff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BRIJOHNEA JOHNSON , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-cv-0603 (KBJ)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kenneth Johnson I applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) *1266Benefits and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act in December of 2008 and July of 2009, respectively. The Commissioner of So

ORDER HAYES, District Judge. The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) issued by United States Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick, recommending that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) be denied and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) be granted. BACKGROUND I. Plaintiffs Previous Féd

RILEY, Chief Judge. Katherine Johnson appeals after the district court 1 affirmed the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) denial of Johnson’s application for supplemental security income (SSI). See 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Because there is substantial evidence supporting the admi

GORTON, J. Pamela Jane Drew ("Drew" or "petitioner") filed this action to appeal the denial of her application for disability benefits against Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("the Commissioner" or "respondent"). Petitioner claims she was wrongfully denied disability insurance benefits because the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") improperly discounted the medical opinion of her attending physici

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge Plaintiff Marie Derbes (“Derbes” or “plaintiff’) seeks judicial review of the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits by defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin (“the Commissioner”), in her- official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”). Pending before the Court are plaintiffs motion for jud

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Chestine Gajos’s motion seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny her application for disability benefits [1, 27]. Plaintiff asks the Court to reverse the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denying her benefits and remand the case to the So

OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Bonnie Fields seeks review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2). Plaintiff asks the Court to reverse the Commissioner’s decision and award benefits,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Tonya Malone, who has a history of pain and mental health issues, seeks review of the denial of her claim for Social Security disability benefits, arguing that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erroneously failed to consider the opinion of an examining consultative orthopedist and disregarded the findings of state agency ps

GORTON, J. Lyle Yearling ("Yearling" or "plaintiff") filed this action appealing the denial of his application for disability benefits against Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("the Commissioner" or "defendant"). He claims he was improperly denied Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") because the presiding Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") failed to consider valid medical evidence and substi

OPINION AND ORDER RUDY LOZANO, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court for review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income to Plaintiff Michael H. Potysman. For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for furt

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (DOCKET ENTRY # 13) BOWLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Pending before this court is a motion to dismiss this social security disability action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(

OPINION AND ORDER William C. Lee, Judge, United States District Court This matter is before the court for judicial review of a final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration denying Plaintiffs application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), *737as provided for in the Social

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This is an action by Pamela J. Woodie (‘Woodie”) appealing the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) determining that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to Social Security .disability benefits. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). '

OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Plaintiff, Frenche Salaiz, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In September 2012, the Plaintiff protectively filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits, alleging disability beginning on January 1, 2010. The

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Marisol Vega (Vega), on behalf of her child, K.I.V., seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying her application for child Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSI) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (Act). Vega

OPINION AND ORDER PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ricky Mansfield appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The ALJ assessed Mansfield as having five “severe impairments,” but found that he was still physically capable of “medium work,” including his previous relevant *685

ORDER On consideration of the petition for rehearing filed by the plaintiff-appellant in the above case on June 20, 2016, the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition. The petition is therefore DENIED.