Cases

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. This appeal is from the denial of the appellants’ motion for summary judgment in an action seeking damages for injuries sustained by the appellee, Cindy Berwick, when she tripped over a television cable that lay across her driveway. We reverse. Charter Communications ran a television cable across Berwick’s driveway in order to prov

Case: 24-50121 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 14, 2025 No. 24-50121

561 S.E.2d 793 (2002) 211 W.Va. 71 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, PLLC, Plaintiff, v. COMMUNITY ANTENNA SERVICE, INC., a corporation, Defendant. No. 30021. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 15, 2002. Decided February 22, 2002. *795 Ancil G Ramey, James D. Gray, Hanna

Filed 8/4/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BRADLEY HIRDMAN, D084304 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1931034) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superi

FILED Jul 28, 2022 03:43 PM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE ROBERT SAUBER, ) Docket No. 2022-03-0480 Employee, ) V. ) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, ) LLC aka CHARTER SPECTRUM, ) State File No. 22808-2022 Employer, ) And ) NATIONAL UNION FIRE ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) PITTSBURG, PA, ) Carrier. ) Judge Pamela B. Johnson EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER The Court held an Expedited H

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. Charter Communications is a provider of video, internet, and voice communications services. This case arose when Charter underwent a corporate reorganization in order to segregate its Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") services from its regulated wholesale telecommunications services. As part of the reorganization, Charter moved its VoIP accounts from "Charter Fiberlink" to a newly created af

269 S.W.3d 520 (2008) John GUIDRY, Simul-Vision Cable Systems, Ltd., and Guidry Cable Vision Management Company, Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Charter Communications Ent. 1, LLC, Baumann Property Co., U.B.S. Realty Investors, LLC, Defendants, and Seven Trails West, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. No. ED 88538. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division T

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. Penny Davenport and three other named Plaintiffs brought this action on their own behalf and on behalf of similarly situated call center employees who worked on an hourly basis at Defendant Charter Communications, LLC (“Charter”). Plaintiffs claim that Charter violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207; the state wa

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. This putative class and collective action is before the Court on several related motions. Defendant Charter Communications, LLC (“Charter”) moves (Doc. No. 183) for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ request for class relief in their claim for unpaid overtime wages under the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act (“Kentucky Act”), Ky.Re

MURPHY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Because the court focuses too narrowly in its reading of the DMCA, overlooks certain plain language used by Congress, and fails to give effect to the statute as a whole, I respectfully dissent. The subpoena power created by Congress in § 512(h) does not limit the type of service provider for whom subpoenas may be issued in the fight against internet piracy. Section 512(h) autho

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1023 Doc: 128 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1001 Doc: 134 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.

BLOCK, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs, five minors and their parents, bring this disability discrimination and retaliation action against Success Academy *359Charter Schools, Success Academy Fort Greene (collectively, "Success Academy"), Success Academy Fort Greene's former principal Candido Brown ("Brown"), and six Doe defendants under § 50

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Pamela K. Chen, United States District Judge *195Plaintiffs Kim Patrick and her son, AG, bring this action against Defendants, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (" § 1983" or " Section 1983"),

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1008 BROADCAST INNOVATION, L.L.C. and IO RESEARCH PTY LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

Joe Johnson v. Spireon, Inc., No. 317, Sept. Term 2024. Opinion by Tang, J.; concurrence by Friedman, J. COURTS—CONCURRENT AND CONFLICTING JURISDICTION—COURTS OF SAME STATE—TRANSFER OF CAUSES—EFFECT OF TRANSFER AND PROCEEDINGS HAD THEREAFTER—IMPROPER TRANSFER Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article § 4-402(e)(1) provides that “In a civil action in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $25,000, exclusive of attorney’s fees if attorney’s fees are recoverable by law or contract, a party may

AMENDED ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE comes before the Court as a disability discrimination action brought pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3603, et seq., and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq. Plaintiffs are thirty-two deaf pers

412 F.Supp.2d 588 (2006) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC, d/b/a Charter Communications, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Melvin ELEAZER, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A.5:04 1204. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division. January 25, 2006. *589 Adam S. Caldwell, Maria C. Moran, Cole Raywid & Braverman, Washington,

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Maple BPA, Inc, appeals as of right the circuit court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant, Bloomfield Charter Township (Bloomfield Township). After the Michigan Liquor Control Commission (the Commission) denied Maple BPA’s application for a liquor license on the basis that it did not comply with Bloomfield Township’s zoning ordinance (the ordinance), Maple BPA sought a declaratory ju

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCSC-163 No. 16PA20 Filed 17 December 2021 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. JOSHUA H. STEIN, Attorney General v. KINSTON CHARTER ACADEMY, a North Carolina non-profit corporation; OZIE L. HALL, JR., individually and as Chief Executive Officer of Kinston Charter Academy; and DEMYRA MCDONALD HALL, individually and as Boar