⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Johnson v. Bisignano”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2259 Doc: 45 Filed: 12/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 40 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2259 CRYSTAL HULTZ, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1972-03-28 · Published · cited 2× · 343 F. Supp. 263; 173 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 344; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14455
343 F.Supp. 263 (1972) The COCA-COLA COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. Catherine C. (Mrs. Alphonso) BISIGNANO, and Alphonso Bisignano, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 6-1611-C. United States District Court, S. D. Iowa, C. D. March 28, 1972. Frank W. Davis, of Davis, Huebner, Johnson & Burt, Des Moines, Iowa, and Julius R. Lunsford, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaint
District Court, S.D. New York · 2000-09-11 · Published · cited 16× · 113 F. Supp. 2d 591; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13119; 2000 WL 1370445
113 F.Supp.2d 591 (2000) Victoria BISIGNANO and Anthony Bisignano, as the parents and best friends of Amanda Bisignano, an infant under the age of eighteen years of age, Plaintiffs, v. HARRISON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT and Vincent Nicita, individually, Defendants. No. 99 Civ. 1644(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 11, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998-04-13 · Published · cited 6× · 249 A.D.2d 370; 671 N.Y.S.2d 112; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3949
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated January 31, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and (2) a judgment of the same court dated March 27, 1997, which dismissed the complaint (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further
Thompson v. Johnsonpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976-04-08 · Published · cited 29× · 410 F. Supp. 633; 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15667
410 F.Supp. 633 (1976) Leroy THOMPSON v. Robert L. JOHNSON, (Supt.), et al. Civ. A. No. 74-1489. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 8, 1976. *634 *635 *636 Professor Ralph S. Spritzer, Mark Wilcox, Student Atty., Indigent Prisoner Litig
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971-03-12 · Published · cited 5× · 438 F.2d 1343; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11374
438 F.2d 1343 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Anthony RUSSO, Appellant,v.The STATE OF NEW JERSEY and the Principal Keeper of the State Prison at Trenton, New Jersey.UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Frank BISIGNANO, Appellant,v.The STATE OF NEW JERSEY and the Principal Keeper of the State Prison at Trenton, New Jersey. No. 18410. No. 18498. United State
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965-10-13 · Published · cited 61× · 351 F.2d 429
351 F.2d 429 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Anthony RUSSO, Appellant,v.The STATE OF NEW JERSEY and the Principal Keeper of theState Prison atTrenton, New Jersey.UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Frank BISIGNANO, Appellant,v.The STATE OF NEW JERSEY and the Principal Keeper of theState Prison atTrenton, New Jersey. Nos. 14833, 14869. United States Court of Appeals Third C
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DEMETRIA C., 1 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-02975 (GMH) ) FRANK BISIGNANO, Acting ) Commissioner o
Dunlap v. O'Malleypublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TERESA D., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-02864 (GMH) FRANK BISIGNANO, 2 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Teresa D. brought this action seek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006-03-14 · Published · cited 5× · 27 A.D.3d 536; 813 N.Y.S.2d 143
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated April 5, 2005, as granted the cross motion of the defendants the City of New York and the New York City Board of Education for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appeale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001-04-02 · Published · cited 3× · 282 A.D.2d 430; 722 N.Y.S.2d 589; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3327
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Nassau-BOCES appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), dated August 17, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and any cross claims insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and cross claims are dismissed insofar as as
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0522 Submitted February 21, 2024—Filed June 28, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. DEREK MICHAEL WHITE, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Osceola County, Shayne L. Mayer, Judge. Derek White contends that his right of confrontation under the Iowa Constitution was violated. DECISION OF COURT O
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 1 A.D.2d 436; 767 N.Y.S.2d 31
*437In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of claims for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated December 19, 2002, as denied that branch of the petition which was for a permanent stay of the arbitration of Leroy Langhorne and, in effect, dismis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 25-807 ARIZONA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE D.C. No. OF OREGON; DELMY FRANCO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000-11-06 · Published · cited 4× · 277 A.D.2d 199; 715 N.Y.S.2d 441; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11173
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated November 10, 1999, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the defendants’ answer and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme Court p
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025-10-03 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1169 O. DOE; BRAZILIAN WORKER CENTER; LA COLABORATIVA, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; US DEPARTMENT OF STATE; MARCO RUBIO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in his official capacity as
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-11-09 · Published · cited 18× · 904 F. Supp. 2d 249; 55 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2820; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161237; 2012 WL 5467519
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiffs commenced this action on January 27, 2011, seeking to recover from *254the Defendants, jointly and severally, unpaid contributions owed to the Plaintiff Funds, pursuant to Sections 502(a)(3) and 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-09-04 · Published · cited 0× · 343 F. App'x 841
*843OPINION PER CURIAM. Ronald K. Miles, Gordon C. Miles, Kenneth Miles, Ernest L. Miles, Jr., and Joyce Cauley (collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”) appeal pro se from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing their § 1983 complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to sta
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2026-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–1254 Submitted December 16, 2025—Filed March 27, 2026 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Andrew Jay Porter, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott J. Beattie, judg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-09-04 · Published · cited 0× · 343 F. App'x 841
*843OPINION PER CURIAM. Ronald K. Miles, Gordon C. Miles, Kenneth Miles, Ernest L. Miles, Jr., and Joyce Cauley (collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”) appeal pro se from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing their § 1983 complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to sta